[c-nsp] Router to push 622Mbps

[Mark Tinka]

On Monday, July 19, 2010 07:49:58 pm Phil Pierotti wrote:

> Aside from the MX line being devoted specifically to
> ethernet interfaces, in what way is an MX-80 not a good
> competitor to (for example) an ASR1002?

What would stand out the most, for me, is that the MX80 
won't do SONET/SDH or some other non-Ethernet services.

That said, one would suspect that Juniper could come out 
with non-Ethernet MIC's, particularly POS-based units. 
Whether they make cost-sense to operators or not, is another 
issue :-).

Of course, if your network is largely or solely Ethernet, 
the choice is obvious given the scaling requirements.

Cheers,

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20100720/3639c802/attachment-0001.bin>