[c-nsp] smaller PI

[Ziv Leyes]

That's weird,  "PI" stands for "provider independent". How can one be independent with a non-routable IP range???
Where did the "try to aggregate as much as possible" concept go to?
Ziv


-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Sascha Pollok
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 3:28 PM
To: Arie Vayner (avayner)
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] smaller PI

It is like it is. RIPE NCC allocates PI according to the demand
within 12 months. If it is a /26, you'll get a /26. RIPE NCC does
not guarantee that the block they allocate is routable.

Tricky eh? There is a policy proposal to make PI blocks at
least /24 in case it is planned to announce them to the DFZ.

-Sascha

On Wed, 30 Jun 2010, Arie Vayner (avayner) wrote:

> That's an interesting development... I know that some providers run
> filters to filter anything longer than /24, so this may be an
> interesting experience...
>
> Arie
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jan Gregor
> Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 14:54
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] smaller PI
>
> Hi guys,
>
> one of our customers requested PI adresses from RIPE (for whatever
> reason) and got back /26.
> Opinions?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

 
 
************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses.
************************************************************************************




 
 
************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses.
************************************************************************************