[c-nsp] policy based routing & CPU / MEM

[Sharef Mustafa]

Venny, Alll

I want to route a range of IPs (pppoe customers) to certain upstream and the
other to another upstream

I have BGP with both upstreams, links to upstraems are not equal in
bandwidth and I could not
figure out a way to achieve load sharing/fail-over in BGP to control ingress
traffic


so to answer your question: YES i'm trying to change the next hop based on
the source ip



Sharef

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Abello, Vinny <Vinny_Abello at dell.com>wrote:

> Are you talking about using a policy map or simply a route-map on a BGP
> neighbor? What exactly are you trying to accomplish? Are you trying to
> change the next-hop based on the source address?
>
> Vinny Abello
> Network Engineer
> Dell | Physician Services
> office +1 973 940 6125
> mobile +1 973 868 0610
> vinny_abello at dell.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Sharef Mustafa
> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 10:28 AM
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] policy based routing & CPU / MEM
>
> I want to use route-maps and BGP to route traffic based on source IP, but
> I'm not sure of it's impact on the performance of the box
> I use cisco 7206 VXR NPE-G2 serving 2000 pppoe customers.
>
> Did anyone try policy based routing (route maps with BGP) on such
> environment?
>
> if so what was it's impact on the CPU, memory and performance?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Sharef
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>