[c-nsp] Handling Out of order packet
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Mon Apr 4 16:27:43 EDT 2011
On 04/04/2011 15:42, Jared Mauch wrote:
> Is there a reason you are not just doing per-flow? Have you looked at
> running LACP?
LACP is orthogonal to the hashing algorithm.
> I would leave per-packet as a last resort in almost any environment.
I have seen per-packet cause performance gain, but only in extremely
distressed circumstances. You're right that it should generally be
disabled, because it causes all sorts of trouble.
Nick
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list