[c-nsp] Combining v4 and v6 Route-Maps for BGP Peers

[Devon True]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

All:

Any caveats with using the same route-map for v4 and v6 BGP peering
sessions? What about statements with match statements that match either
v4 and v6?

e.g.

route-map foo permit 10
 match ip next-hop foo
 match ipv6 next-hop bar

Would that match v4 or v6, depending on the address type?

- -- 
Devon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk1MJMkACgkQWP2WrBTHBS8nJgCbBw2HrM7PVDYrqcOALdWi+cnb
K54Aniwtnl1jTfTpGXLvY8Yeidhv1osH
=f1Zw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----