[c-nsp] Combining v4 and v6 Route-Maps for BGP Peers

[Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)]

> Any caveats with using the same route-map for v4 and v6 BGP peering
> sessions? What about statements with match statements that match
either
> v4 and v6?
> 
> e.g.
> 
> route-map foo permit 10
>  match ip next-hop foo
>  match ipv6 next-hop bar
> 
> Would that match v4 or v6, depending on the address type?
> 

haven't checked in the lab, but strictly speaking, the above map would
require both conditions to be met, which is not possible for any given
prefix ;-) so I doubt this works.

However below should work:

route-map foo permit 10
 match ip next-hop foo
route-map foo permit 20
 match ipv6 next-hop bar

However this could become cumbersome, so maybe better use distinct
route-maps?

	oli