[c-nsp] need good recommendation for isp gateway nat bgp pbr

[Mark Tinka]

On Friday, May 27, 2011 10:49:25 PM Phil Mayers wrote:

> Also, if you're feeling optimistic/rosy - a successful
> IPv6 day experience and reduced "brokenness" rate could
> result in a near-term reduction of the load on your
> NAT64 box, if Google/Facebook/Akamai decide they are
> going to insert production AAAAs. In that scenario, your
> NAT chokepoint gets *less* loaded and everyone is all
> smiles.

Indeed, and that's the general reason we like NAT64, because 
as v6 keeps getting rolled out more and more, theoretically, 
the load on your NAT64 routers will reduce, and you don't 
need to renumber your v6-only customers as v6 goes 
mainstream.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20110527/14e635ef/attachment.pgp>