[c-nsp] need good recommendation for isp gateway nat bgp pbr

Brian Roche brian at bcctv.net
Fri May 27 12:15:49 EDT 2011


best news I've heard all week :-)  thanks again

On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Mark Tinka <mtinka at globaltransit.net> wrote:
> On Friday, May 27, 2011 10:49:25 PM Phil Mayers wrote:
>
>> Also, if you're feeling optimistic/rosy - a successful
>> IPv6 day experience and reduced "brokenness" rate could
>> result in a near-term reduction of the load on your
>> NAT64 box, if Google/Facebook/Akamai decide they are
>> going to insert production AAAAs. In that scenario, your
>> NAT chokepoint gets *less* loaded and everyone is all
>> smiles.
>
> Indeed, and that's the general reason we like NAT64, because
> as v6 keeps getting rolled out more and more, theoretically,
> the load on your NAT64 routers will reduce, and you don't
> need to renumber your v6-only customers as v6 goes
> mainstream.
>
> Mark.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list