[c-nsp] IOS XR
Mikael Abrahamsson
swmike at swm.pp.se
Tue Sep 6 01:42:47 EDT 2011
On Tue, 6 Sep 2011, Mark Tinka wrote:
> Personally, I don't mind the lack of ISSU. There is no way I'm going to
> trust that things will go well even when ISSU is supported, so we'll
> always be running upgrades during outage windows, and not using ISSU
> just to be sure.
There is also the question about what "ISSU" is. For me, it should be
hitless or at least sub 50ms traffic hit. As far as I know, none of the
router manufacturers come even close to this, even when they're talking
about the future.
Multiple seconds outage is not "in service".
> The worst thing issue I have with IOS XR upgrades is the amount of time
> it takes to run the patch. Even an SMU can take decades, especially if
> it needs to reload the line cards/fabric. It's really annoying - almost
> 1.5hrs upgrading a single box.
Yes, it's a nightmare.
> But, I hear there are plans to significantly reduce the
> upgrades times in upcoming code. Not sure if you need the
> new RP's or if the current ones will do.
Well, "significantly" in this case is not the "order of magnitude"
improvement that I feel is needed to make this good.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list