[c-nsp] ASR9K limitations

[Mikael Abrahamsson]

On Sun, 12 Aug 2012, Mark Tinka wrote:

> Last I heard from Cisco is that it is likely expected
> behaviour because the RFC implies the same, i.e., DAD
> conflicts are not cleared automatically (I'll be honest, I
> haven't verified this claim in the RFC itself).

Best way is to just disable DAD on core point to point interfaces.

This issue has been there for a long time, and I'm not sure exactly what 
behaviour Cisco should go for, but disabling DAD on core interfaces is 
definitely a sure way to go.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se