[c-nsp] ASR100x route tables sanity check

[Blake Dunlap]

You should note that lit is incorrect in regards to the FIB as was pointed
out on the list a few days ago. Look lower in the document for the accurate
numbers based on the included ESP. I believe it is only 500k ipv4.

-Blake

On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 14:08, Christopher J. Pilkington <cjp at 0x1.net> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I'm looking at the new ASR100x series boxes.
>
> We'll have 6 routers, each with a eBGP upstream and full iBGP
> mesh.  So, worst case, 6 full tables.
>
> ASR1001 literature claims 1M IPv4 routes in the ESP
> documentation, which I'm assuming refers to the FIB.  The FIB at
> any given time should have one full table, correct?
>
> The ASR1001 integrated RP will accept 16 GiB of RAM.  Now,
> memory sizes are much different on this platform than before,
> but even that given, this suggests that I can have many copies
> of the DFZ table in the RIB.  (No, we won't run "software
> redundancy".)
>
> Am I reading this correctly?
>
> I requested a demo box from our SE, he told me it would be
> months.  We can't wait that long.  Worst case, I may just have
> to stick with what we know (72xx).
>
> - -cjp
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (Darwin)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk8q7ScACgkQEbYCi28Z3+4pcQCfeRH1nohjP6U6mWCqRC95xWHL
> Kd8Anjc4Rn1Iv1kK8S+Nhd/0cQdjg29w
> =V3N7
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>