[c-nsp] ASR100x route tables sanity check

[Christopher J. Pilkington]

On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 03:01:35PM -0600, Blake Dunlap wrote:
> You should note that lit is incorrect in regards to the FIB as was pointed
> out on the list a few days ago. Look lower in the document for the accurate
> numbers based on the included ESP. I believe it is only 500k ipv4.

I have seen this statement also on multiple occasions, but I
have not found the document showing this 500k number, nor has
anyone ever referenced a link with it.

-cjp