[c-nsp] Considerations for future IPv6 with vrf-lite on ME3400E

[Mark Tinka]

On Wednesday, January 11, 2012 07:01:47 AM Christopher J. 
Pilkington wrote:

> Are there any particular pitfalls we should watch for
> with this configuration w.r.t. rolling out IPv6 in the
> future?

For this one, certainly best to check with your SE.

Since the ME3400 has VRF-Lite for v4 today, it stands to 
reason that it will be supported for v6 in the future. 
However, don't take anyone's word for it.

Your SE (and better yet, the PM for this platform) would be 
the best folks to advise.

Unless, of course, someone on this list already has a 
roadmap for VRF-Lite for v6 on this particular box.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20120111/a63a71d1/attachment.sig>