[c-nsp] VPDN-aware VRF

[Oliver Eyre]

Definitely possible.

Create the VRF and interface like normal and then supply your VPDN group
with the following line:

vpn vrf ProvXYZ

Any resultant sessions will assume default routing table unless explicitly
specified in your Virtual-Template or via RADIUS.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2t/12_2t15/feature/guide/ftvpdnmh.htm
l


Oliver

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Stephen Fulton
Sent: Saturday, 10 March 2012 2:35 AM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] VPDN-aware VRF

Hi all,

I want to terminate a VPDN tunnel within a VRF, but have the actual 
sessions exist within the global routing table.  For example, provider 
XYZ has provided RFC1918 addresses for their LAC's, which I do not want 
to expose in my global table, but my customer's PPPoE sessions which 
would be delivered by provider XYZ must be within my global table with 
public IP addresses.  From my understanding of the documentation, it 
seems possible but I want to confirm with my learned brethren.

Thanks,

-- Stephen

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/