[c-nsp] m-vpn

[Arie Vayner (avayner)]

Usually, the starting point would be here:
http://www.cisco.com/cisco/web/psa/default.html?mode=prod

The specific page you are looking for is here:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/docs/routers/asr9000/software/asr9k_r
4.1/multicast/configuration/guide/mc41mcst.html#wp2631058
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/docs/routers/asr9000/software/asr9k_r
4.1/multicast/configuration/guide/mc41mcst.html#wp2631629
(This is for ASR9K...)

Arie

-----Original Message-----
From: Aaron [mailto:aaron1 at gvtc.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 08:19
To: Arie Vayner (avayner); cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] m-vpn

Thanks Arie, I'm trying to accomplish in ios xr 4.1.2 - got link for
that ?


-----Original Message-----
From: Arie Vayner (avayner) [mailto:avayner at cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 10:15 AM
To: Aaron; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] m-vpn

Aaron,

The MDT BGP address family syntax is relatively new, so might not have
been around when the book was released...

For a more recent source of information, I would suggest:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/docs/ios-xml/ios/ipmulti_mvpn/configu
ration/15-2mt/imc-mvpn-15-2mt-book.html

Arie

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 07:55
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] m-vpn

Hi all,

 

I've read through Chapter 7 of "MPLS and VPN Architectures Volume II"
regarding Multicast VPN.

 

I never saw any mention of enabling the ipv4 mdt address family under
bgp.
Is this ipv4 mdt af something altogether different than what is spoken
of in the book ?  .or did I totally miss something in that chapter about
the ipv4 mdt af being implicitly enable somehow.

 

I'm just trying to accomplish mcast over my mpls L3VPN.  This will be
for my high capacity mcast for catv for all my catv subscribers.  2-3
gbps sustained 24x7.  A couple different pe/ce will xmit and a couple
different pe/ce will rcv.  I'd prefer to use ssm cause I don't wanna
mess with rp's and sup-optimal routing to and from rp and single point
of failure on rp (so I don't wanna mess with redundant rp either if I
can simply do ssm)

 

Aaron

 

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/