[c-nsp] 802.1Q-in-Q VLAN Tag Termination on 7600/6500 OSN modules

[Davide Ambrosi]

Mmmmm interesting..... It could be something like this:

interface gigabitethernet0/2 			> Trunk vs DLSAM/MSAN/FTTH Aggregator
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk allowed vlan none
service instance 1 Ethernet			          > Customer 1
 encapsulation dot1q 10 second-dot1q 20
 rewrite ingress tag pop 2 symmetric
 bridge-domain 101
service instance 2 Ethernet 			> Customer 2
 encapsulation dot1q 10 second-dot1q 21
 rewrite ingress tag pop 2 symmetric
 bridge-domain 102

interface vlan 101
description L3 SVI Customer 1
ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0

interface vlan 102
description L3 SVI Customer 2
ip address 10.0.1.1 255.255.255.0


But the ME3600X support all features of an MPLS Edge node (MBGP, VPLS,
MPLSVPN, QoS etc.) ?
I can't found in Cisco documentation how many SVI an ME3600X can support

Davide


2013/2/28 Mattias Gyllenvarg <Mattias.Gyllenvarg at bredband2.se>:
> Yes and No
>
> You can do better.
>
> But you need to learn about EVC and EFP.
>
> They can basically do whatever you can think of with tags and the attach
> that too a "SVI" (evc in nextgeneration gear).
>
> So, say you want too do a ip unnumbered setup. you just point individual
> tags on individial interfaces too a common EVC. Your gonna love it when you
> get your head around it.
>
>
> On 28 February 2013 10:41, Davide Ambrosi <davide.ambrosi at trivenet.it>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Mattias,
>> but in the ME3600X (or ME3800X) is it possible to apply a
>> configuration like this ?
>>
>> interface gigabitethernet0/1.10100
>> no switchport
>> encapsulation dot1q 10 second-dotq 100
>> ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
>>
>>
>> with the ES+ (and I think also with 7600-SIP-400 + SPA-5X1GE-V2) is
>> possible.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Davide
>>
>> 2013/2/28 Mattias Gyllenvarg <Mattias.Gyllenvarg at bredband2.se>:
>> > Do it in the 3600X, thats what there good at.
>> >
>> >
>> > On 28 February 2013 09:55, Davide Ambrosi <davide.ambrosi at trivenet.it>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Thanks Mack,
>> >> so I have to change all the 7603 boxes and move to 7603-S to support
>> >> the ES+ cards and upgrade all the supervisors to SUP720-3B minimum.
>> >> Moving to ASR's series (like the ASR1002) could be a good alternative
>> >> choice because of the limited GE ports I need on the small POP's (5
>> >> GE) ?
>> >>
>> >> Davide
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2013/2/27 Mack McBride <mack.mcbride at viawest.com>:
>> >> > The ES+ cards are the way to go.
>> >> > The OSM modules aren't going to do what you want.
>> >> > In addition they aren't properly supported in newer code.
>> >> >
>> >> > LR Mack McBride
>> >> > Network Architect
>> >> >
>> >> > -----Original Message-----
>> >> > From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
>> >> > [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Davide
>> >> > Ambrosi
>> >> > Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 9:32 AM
>> >> > To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> >> > Subject: [c-nsp] 802.1Q-in-Q VLAN Tag Termination on 7600/6500 OSN
>> >> > modules
>> >> >
>> >> > Hello,
>> >> >
>> >> > We have some 7603 boxes with SUP720/SUP2 installed as main supervisor
>> >> > in
>> >> > our MPLS Edge sites.
>> >> >
>> >> > Now we need to terminate QinQ VLAN directly on one or more GE
>> >> > interfaces
>> >> > of the 7603 routers because we are planning to introduce metro
>> >> > ethernet
>> >> > tecnologies (ME3400E/ME3600X) in our fiber and microwave access
>> >> > network for
>> >> > reducing the VLAN configured between the switches located in the
>> >> > access
>> >> > network (now we have 1 VLAN = 1 Customer).
>> >> >
>> >> > I see that 7600 catalyst modules doesn't support QinQ VLAN
>> >> > termination
>> >> > (the command "encapsulation dot1q outer-vlan second-dot1q inner-vlan)
>> >> > because they are "LAN" modules.
>> >> >
>> >> > Is there anyone who tested QinQ termination on old 7600 OSN GE
>> >> > modules
>> >> > like the OSM-2+4GE-WAN+ ? If not supported the only way to support
>> >> > QinQ is
>> >> > to buy new (expensive) 7600-S chassis + ES cards or SIP-400 and SPAs
>> >> > V2 ?
>> >> >
>> >> > In out network environment we have also some 7609-S(RSP720) with ES+
>> >> > card located into the core an large aggregation sites and with this
>> >> > equipment we don't have problems because the QinQ Termination is
>> >> > supported
>> >> > on ES+ card.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Davide
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> >> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> >> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > *Med Vänliga Hälsningar - Best Regards*
>> >
>> > *Mattias Gyllenvarg*
>> > *Nätutveckling*
>> > Bredband2
>> >
>> > Tel: +46 406219712
>> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> *Med Vänliga Hälsningar - Best Regards*
>
> *Mattias Gyllenvarg*
> *Nätutveckling*
> Bredband2
>
> Tel: +46 406219712
>