[c-nsp] How to tell what routes are not in CEF and follow DEFAULT path?
Blake Dunlap
ikiris at gmail.com
Tue Jul 2 17:15:25 EDT 2013
The router doesn't store routing information in that way, or think in that
way.
The math involved in doing so is actually pretty expensive.
-Blake
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Jeffrey G. Fitzwater <jfitz at princeton.edu>wrote:
> I have 0.0.0.0 pointing to one of our ISP so that any prefix < /24 ( which
> we don't permit in from any ISP) would get pushed to that ISP which might
> have route.
>
> I am just trying to figure out how may are being pushed to default.
>
>
>
> Jeff F.
> On Jul 2, 2013, at 4:53 PM, Saku Ytti <saku at ytti.fi>
> wrote:
>
> > On (2013-07-02 20:19 +0000), Jeffrey G. Fitzwater wrote:
> >
> >> I would like to find out what routes are NOT in my route table and
> therefore follow the DEFAULT path to 0.0.0.0.
> >>
> >> Would "show ip cef unresolved" work ? I get nothing back when I run
> it but maybe there is nothing to see.
> >
> > What you imagine is FIB covering all possibilities and then next-hop or
> > null, it would not scale and makes no sense. 0.0.0.0 is branch when there
> > is no matching top-level branch.
> >
> > You could produce such data offline and aggregate it to maximally.
> >
> > --
> > ++ytti
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list