[c-nsp] Sup2T - poor netflow performance

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Sun Jul 21 01:31:40 EDT 2013


On Wednesday, March 27, 2013 10:27:49 AM Gert Doering wrote:

> We're not really looking for a box that can do 500
> Gbit/s, but for a box that will have a more reasonable
> operating system than "classic IOS with the missing
> feature of the week", more mature IPv6 and netflow
> support - and having a faster CPU and larger FIB would
> not be frowned upon.

I wish I could have said that Juniper were an option, but 
the fact that you're mostly a Cisco house notwithstanding, 
Junos sucks these days (less these days than, say, 2 years 
ago, but...), unless you're stuck in Junos 8.5 land, where 
it's rock solid, but useless with current gear :-).

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20130721/164f1f9f/attachment.sig>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list