[c-nsp] Sup2T - poor netflow performance

[Mark Tinka]

On Wednesday, March 27, 2013 08:15:17 AM Mattias Gyllenvarg 
wrote:

> Also, not only is there no redundant RSP it is not
> replaceable either.

The same can be said of the MX80, a competitor the ASR9001 
is squarely aimed at (albeit, the ASR9001 will have 40Gbps 
Ethernet ports, unlike the MX80).

That said, the MX104 looks pretty sweet - aimed at the 
ASR1004/1006.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20130721/bc5affe0/attachment.sig>