[c-nsp] Sup2T - poor netflow performance

Eugeniu Patrascu eugen at imacandi.net
Mon Jul 22 06:44:28 EDT 2013

On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu> wrote:

> On Wednesday, March 27, 2013 08:15:17 AM Mattias Gyllenvarg
> wrote:
> > Also, not only is there no redundant RSP it is not
> > replaceable either.
> The same can be said of the MX80, a competitor the ASR9001
> is squarely aimed at (albeit, the ASR9001 will have 40Gbps
> Ethernet ports, unlike the MX80).
> That said, the MX104 looks pretty sweet - aimed at the
> ASR1004/1006.
And then you look at the licensing options and find that you need to pay
the same sum again to have the box actually do anything interesting :)
Cisco/Juniper are copying Brocade with their licensing model for almost
every feature.


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list