[c-nsp] Two HUBS-Location Specific Spokes-Redundant to each other

Pete Lumbis alumbis at gmail.com
Tue Jul 23 11:02:50 EDT 2013

If by "closest" you mean "lowest latency" you probably want to look at
something like PfR to do this dynamically for you.

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:48 AM, vasu varma <ypkcar at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Team,
> I have a requirement in such a way that there are two HUB's, one in Newyork
> and other in LOS Angeles. The spoke locations will access the HUB location
> whichever is closer geographically and the other acts as the backup for
> that particular site.
> If both the HUB's injects default route into the cloud, how can I configure
> the iBGP attributes to select the best path based on the closest physical
> location.
> Our's is a MPLS cloud with multiple customers sharing the same Infra.
> Can someone assist me with the solution approach and most importantly the
> changes that I need to do in my network.
> Regards
> Yaswanth
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list