[c-nsp] EIGRP Variance

[Randy]

>Hi Randy
>I know what the variance command does and know how to manipulate 
>I was challenged to do what I asked without using any filtering or touch the variance command configured
>
>
>> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 14:35:22 -0800
>> From: randy_94108 at yahoo.com
>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] EIGRP Variance
>> To: gunner_200 at live.com; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> 
>> > From: M K <gunner_200 at live.com>
>> > To: "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
>> > Cc: 
>> > Sent: Friday, November 29, 2013 1:55 PM
>> > Subject: [c-nsp] EIGRP Variance
>> > 
>> > Hi I have two unequal cost paths to reach a specific destinationI configured 
>> > variance and the two routes are installed in the routing tableHow can I use the 
>> > low cost always with keeping the other one installed in the routing table ?
>> 
>> 
>> If I understand you correctly:
>> You have enabled unequal-cost load sharing via variance but *don't wish* to load share.
>> 
>> Does that make any sense to you?
>> 
>> Disable variance, lowest cost path will be in rib and EIGRP topology db will have both - tweak delay if needed so the *other* exists as a feasibel successor.
>> ./Randy


...an exam eh!
consider metric-weights.
(load/reliability) - don't do this in production.
./Randy