[c-nsp] WARNING: Netflow & Hardware assisted NAT not supported on 65xx on the same interface even with Sup2T

[Phil Mayers]

On 11/10/13 14:11, Matthew Huff wrote:
> FYI,
>
> At least cisco went back end and added caveats to the documentation
> about this limitation. Since I had combed through all the
> documentation beforehand, had the caveat been there, it would have
> been likely we would have purchased a different set of hardware.

Have they pulled that great Cisco trick of updating the docs but not 
updating the "last edited" timestamp, fooling you into thinking it's 
always been there?