[c-nsp] Bridging over PPP

Ross Halliday ross.halliday at wtccommunications.ca
Sun Sep 1 08:55:03 EDT 2013


Just throwing this out here, but why are you bridging PPPoE customers which supposedly 'terminate' on the 7201? Why not L2TP LAC/LNS? With your 7201 acting as a LAC you can push the tunnels anywhere IP will go. Bridging IMHO is a nasty thing that should only be used where strictly necessary.


Ross

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Mike
> Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2013 5:21 PM
> To: 'Cisco-nsp'
> Subject: [c-nsp] Bridging over PPP
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 	I have a location that has several PPPoE customers, which are
> terminating on my 7201 router. I have a somewhat unreliable ethernet
> link connecting these users to the router which I have decided to
> replace with a link formed of bonded T1's. The question is can I somehow
> create an ethernet bridge over bonded T1's (ppp multilink) or must I use
> a VPN to tunnel the ethernet traffic thru? I am happy with and have an
> ethernet bridging over vpn solution, it's just peformance and the fact
> of needing another box at the far end site close to the users which is
> ugly and undesirable. Any suggestions appreciated.
> 
> Mike-
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list