[c-nsp] Re ASR9000 Multicast over P2MP TE tunnels

[Mark Tinka]

On Wednesday, July 02, 2014 10:47:14 AM Catalin Petrescu 
wrote:

> I think you are referring to this test
> http://www.eantc.de/fileadmin/eantc/downloads/events/2011
> -2015/MPLSEWC2013/EANTC-MPLSEWC2013-WhitePaper-5.1.pdf ,

No, not that test. The test I'm talking about is in a live 
operator.

But thanks for the link, anyway :-).

> The paper doesn't say what version they are running on
> asr as per cisco documentation only static configuration
> is available thus only S-PMSI is advertised at least in
> 4.3.2.

I ran a PoC in Raleigh at the end of last year with Cisco, 
and they supported both I- and S-PMSI on the ASR9000.

Par-for-par, I'm now satisfied with using an ASR9000 as a 
video-enabled edge router. The only reason we always stuck 
to Juniper, until now, is because they had a working NG-MVPN 
implementation.

Cisco have now come to the party, both in terms of p2mp 
RSVP-TE and mLDP. So they are certainly on my radar if we 
need to deploy edge routers.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20140702/eed50946/attachment.sig>