[c-nsp] Access layer replacement for 6500/Sup720

[Mark Tinka]

On Monday, March 24, 2014 06:23:02 PM Rolf Hanßen wrote:

> Are there any other recommendations in that or lower
> price region? Does not need to be Cisco. What do other
> ISPs use for such szenarios?

If you want reasonably functional QoS ingress and egress, 
the ME3600X/3800X is your friend.

If you don't care about that (or other fancy features), and 
if your application is purely closet/LAN and not Metro, then 
there are lots of options between Cisco and other vendors in 
this space.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20140324/4bd45315/attachment.sig>