[c-nsp] "ipv6 router ospf" vs "router ospfv3"

[Mark Tinka]

On Tuesday, March 25, 2014 02:32:13 PM Tim Durack wrote:

> RTR-1#sh run | sec router ospf
> router ospfv3 10

Oh, that's cool. 

I didn't know Cisco had implemented the Multi-AF support for 
OSPFv3 (Junos had it since Junos 9).

For those interested, this took some digging, but:

	http://tinyurl.com/psbjbyt

I'm definitely going to consider migrating to this for my 
Anycast servers. I just need to test whether this will when 
the Anycast servers support different OSPF versions for each 
address family.

> At this point we prefer to run OSPFv2 for IPv4 and OSPFv3
> for IPv6, so multi-af support is not critical.

I'll fall back to this if my Anycast servers (Quagga/Zebra) 
don't like it.

> I'm thinking "router ospf" and "router ospv3" might be
> the preferred cli.

That would be my thinking as well, yes.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20140325/f461fb74/attachment.sig>