[c-nsp] ASR9001 Vs ASR1006

Tom Hill tom at ninjabadger.net
Sat May 14 15:48:55 EDT 2016


On 14/05/16 20:30, James Ventre wrote:
> ​I've been down this road with other boxes (3750E/2811/6500), it's just
> too much of a headache.​
> 
> Depending on the rack and it's elevation in the rack, they often sit
> right on the threshold.  The system temp of a 2811, mid rack, is 40C
> (fan speed is high) - which is right on the threshold.  A 3750E
> ​,​
> mid-rack, is only 1C away from the Yellow threshold.
> ​  The 6500 is at the bottom of the rack, and it's OK for now, but the
> inlet temperature is 39C.
>

These are all wildly dissimilar products to a 9001.

 - The 3750E/2811 are 1U, with tiny fans as a result
 - The 6500 is a gigantic lump of power consumption

For the avoidance of doubt, I have three 9001s, all of which are
installed without baffles, and in a variety of UK data centres.

The temperatures are all fine, there aren't any alarms (historical or
otherwise). Some data centres have their cold aisle setpoints lower than
others, and some racks are less useful than others (eg. quarter racks)
but all are fine.

Use the v2 tray to be on the safe side, but 2/3 of mine are all on v1
still and I don't worry. :)

Regards,

-- 
Tom


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list