[c-nsp] Correct syntax for Boot system

Scott Voll svoll.voip at gmail.com
Thu Feb 28 13:05:54 EST 2019


my question is the extra flash in the command:

boot system *flash* bootflash:filename.bin

is that something new?

Scott




On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 9:53 AM Tyler Applebaum <applebaumt at ochin.org>
wrote:

> On the 4k series I use bootflash:<filename>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Scott Voll
> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 9:40 AM
> To: cisco-nsp <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: [c-nsp] Correct syntax for Boot system
>
> I have always used
>
> boot system flash:xxxxxx.bin or boot system bootflash:xxxx.bin
>
> did the syntax change to boot system flash flash0:xxxxx.bin???
>
> I have a new 4331 that without the extra flash it failed to boot.   Is this
> new?  did I miss the memo?
>
> does this carry over to ASRs and the older 29xx/39xx platforms?
>
> I'm booting a bunch of remote routers and don't want to be driving to
> recover them from a simple mistake I missed.
>
> TIA
>
> Scott
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> Attention: Information contained in this message and or attachments is
> intended only for the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential
> and or privileged material that is protected under State or Federal law. If
> you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
> or action taken on it is prohibited. If you believe you have received this
> email in error, please contact the sender with a copy to
> compliance at ochin.org, delete this email and destroy all copies.
>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list