[c-nsp] ASR920 is a ticking timebomb (CSCvk35460)
David White, Jr. (dwhitejr)
dwhitejr at cisco.com
Thu Jan 24 11:15:44 EST 2019
Hi Reuben,
Unfortunately, 'Terminated' in this case has double meanings. It in
fact does mean exactly what you have stated, 'a conscious decision was
made not to fix this bug'. However, it /also/ means 'Unreproducible -
we are unable to reproduce the issue, and need additional information
before we can proceed further'.
In the case of CSCvk35460, it's the Unreproducible meaning which
applies. So, opening a TAC case is not a waste of time.
Sincerely,
David.
On 1/23/2019 5:42 PM, Reuben Farrelly via cisco-nsp wrote:
> To:
> <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
>
>
> On 24/01/2019 6:23 am, Giles Coochey wrote:
>> I think the tack the OP was meant to imply that Cisco Bughunt for
>> issues leaves a lot to be desired, with terse messages attached to
>> bugs, incomplete versions affected, etc...
>
> The thing that sends me off the deep end with bugs like this is when
> they are marked with a status of "Terminated" especially if they have
> a high severity.
>
> Perhaps it is just a case of a bad choice of words, but that reads to
> me the effect of "we have made a conscious decision to not fix this
> bug" and implies that it's most likely a waste of time opening a TAC
> case about it.
>
> Reuben
> Subject:
> Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 is a ticking timebomb (CSCvk35460)
> From:
> Reuben Farrelly <reuben-cisco-nsp at reub.net>
> Date:
> 1/23/2019, 5:42 PM
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list