[c-nsp] Cisco N540-ACC-SYS ipv4 routes

[Jason Lixfeld]

I’m not as familiar with the ASR1002-HX, but what I’m pretty sure of is if you’re considering the ASR1002-HX for IGW, you may want to review Juniper’s MX204.  It’s probably going to be slightly more expensive than a NCS540, but far less expensive than the ASR1002-HX, but overall it will be a much better bang for your buck as an IGW.

> On Jul 8, 2020, at 8:48 PM, Vikas Sharma <vikassharmas at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Many thanks Jason for your quick response.
> 
> If possible please also confirm the rib/fib limits of ASR1002-HX.
> 
> I have two choices to be used as IGW, ASR1002-HX or C 540 X and I want to choose the best of the two options.
> 
> Regards,
> Vikas
> 
> On Thu, 9 Jul, 2020, 12:52 am Jason Lixfeld, <jason at lixfeld.ca <mailto:jason at lixfeld.ca>> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I don’t know the exact RIB scale, if there is one, short of what available memory will hold.  That said, it’s got 8GB of memory, and I’ve seen 1.7M+ BGP prefixes with the BGP process consuming about 1.9GB of memory.
> 
> It won’t hold a full table in FIB. 350K max, protocol independent, depending on the prefix size.
> 
> SRD is implemented using table-policy.
> 
> > On Jul 8, 2020, at 3:02 PM, Vikas Sharma <vikassharmas at gmail.com <mailto:vikassharmas at gmail.com>> wrote:
> > 
> > Dear,
> > 
> > Can someone please confirm how many routes are supported in above model in
> > both rib and fib?
> > 
> > Also, I am not able to find table-map command for this router.
> > 
> > Any suggestions?
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> >     Vikas
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp <https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp>
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ <http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/>
>