[cisco-voip] CMM 6 Pri's

Lelio Fulgenzi lelio at uoguelph.ca
Mon Jul 26 10:34:06 EDT 2004


That's essentially what you do, but I'm not sure about dial-peers. We just use a route pattern as a catchall that forwards any unknown calls to the PBX. It's very important to remember a few things:
  a.. The calling search space you assign to the trunks from the PBX to CCM should not include the partition which has the default route pattern back to itself. This could result in loops, which would be bad.
  b.. The PBX has to handle the 'unknown' extensions with either error tone or message. It can not send unknown extensions to the Call Manager. Well, it could, as long as you programmed things properly as mentioned above, but it would be dangerous.

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Voll, Scott 
  To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
  Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 10:23 AM
  Subject: [cisco-voip] CMM 6 Pri's


  Currently I have a configuration of 3 PRI's going into our PBX and one
  PRI from the PBX to My IPT network.  Due to the qsig signaling we have
  to run this PRI as a H323 Gateway.

  We have just purchased a CMM and PRI card for our 6509, and would like
  to put my IPT network in front of the PBX.  Looking like 3 PRI's coming
  in on the CMM (MGCP) then three PRI's going into the PBX (h323). 

  So the question; with this setup do I just make a Dial peer that says
  XXXX go to PBX?  CM will route any extensions it knows about (closest
  match routing) to the IPT network and route the rest to the PBX?  

  TIA

  Scott


  _______________________________________________
  cisco-voip mailing list
  cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20040726/cafb5c7d/attachment.html


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list