[cisco-voip] 7960 firmware load P00306000400
Candace Holman
Candace_Holman at harvard.edu
Tue Nov 23 16:27:12 EST 2004
You're half right. It's true that you can't go back to unsigned loads,
but both of these are signed loads. However, 6.0-3 was the first signed
load for both CM versions 3.x and 4.x
Candace
At 03:54 PM 11/23/2004, Hering, Marc wrote:
>I could be wrong,,(usually am) but isn't the 5.0 loads unsigned and the
>6.0 loads signed? IIRC once you put a signed load onto a phone you
>cannot go back to an unsigned load (Again, I could be wrong)
>
><M>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
>[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Candace Holman
>Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 3:44 PM
>To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>Subject: [cisco-voip] 7960 firmware load P00306000400
>
>I have a phone stuck with firmware load P00306000400 (6.0-3). I set the
>device record in CM (3.3.3) to force it to use P00305000400 (5.0-4) and
>it will not pick up the older load on a reset. There are no errors in
>the status messages on the phone, and no tftp errors on the server.
>Does anyone know a workaround?
>
>Thanks,
>
>=====================================================================
>Candace Holman
>
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-voip mailing list
>cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>The Gale Company is one of the largest real estate companies in the
>industry with a global portfolio exceeding 60 million square feet of
>office space. For more information contact 973-301-9500 or visit
>www.TheGaleCompany.com
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20041123/14e18450/attachment.html
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list