[cisco-voip] Auto Attendant
Wes Sisk
wsisk at cisco.com
Wed Feb 2 19:22:08 EST 2005
Yes, i was hoping to get off with just dummy users with extensions, but
no go. You could use ldif files to populate just the primary extension
for dummy users in DCDirectory. Not sure that would really be TAC
supported though. And, not sure about your LDIF adeptness, but I could
have it done with BAT before I got the first LDIF written, let alone
past the parser interface.
/Wes
Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
> Ah - fake devices would be needed for dial by name. I see now.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Wes Sisk <mailto:wsisk at cisco.com>
> *To:* Voll, Scott <mailto:Scott.Voll at wesd.org>
> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 02, 2005 7:12 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Auto Attendant
>
> Hi Scott,
>
> For the CRS route, no $ for users on CM AFAIK, though a bit of
> admin work.
> create dummy phones (or CTI ports) with DN's that match the PBX
> user's DN
> configure CallFwdAll (CFA) with a route pattern & css so when that
> number is called, the call traverses trunks to your PBX correctly.
> now create users with appropriate first/last names and associate
> to the
> respective phone. Make sure to select the dummy phone's extension as
> the primary extension for that user. This is what the CRS AA script
> uses when you do option #2 spell by name.
>
> If you prefer to use Unity's AA, then Lelio's post is spot on with
> using
> internet subscribers. Just remember to setup your transfer
> destination,
> CSS and route patterns so when unity attempts transfer, it does reach
> the PBX :
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/2005-February/002898.html
>
> /Wes
>
> Voll, Scott wrote:
>
> > can you describe the dummy users needed to make this work?
> >
> > can you describe the email only subscribers? is this licensing
> > ($$$$$$$$)?
> >
> > scott
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > *From:* Wes Sisk [mailto:wsisk at cisco.com]
> > *Sent:* Wed 2/2/2005 2:13 PM
> > *To:* Voll, Scott
> > *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> > *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Auto Attendant
> >
> > Hi Scott,
> >
> > The CRS AA and a bunch of dummy users
> > or Unity with Email only subscribers
> >
> > /Wes
> >
> > Voll, Scott wrote:
> >
> > >I need help finding a solution.
> > >
> > >I have CM 3.3.4sr2, Unity 4.0.4 and CRS 3.1.3sr3 and will be
> upgrading
> > >to CM 4.1.2 and CRS 3.5.2. I currently am integrated with AD
> 2003. I
> > >also have a legacy PBX connected to my VoIP network. I have
> ~150 users
> > >on CM and Unity and ~400 users on a PBX and it's Vmail system.
> > >
> > >What can I use to give me a fully functional Auto Attendant? I
> can't
> > >use the old Vmail system as ~150 users are not on it. I can't
> use Unity
> > >because ~400 users are not on it. I opened a TAC case to get
> the AA
> > >script in CRS to work and now it works but only works if the
> user has a
> > >device (ip Phone) associated with them.
> > >
> > >I don't understand why I can't get something to work. That's how
> > >Attendant console works. It looks at the Active Directory
> Phone number
> > >and transfers whether its on CM or PBX.
> > >
> > >Anyone have any ideas?
> > >
> > >TIA
> > >
> > >Scott
> > >
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >cisco-voip mailing list
> > >cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> > >
> > >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list