[cisco-voip] H323 and MGCP simultaneously on gateway?

[Scott Coner (US)]

H.323 and MGCP is supported.  I had a need to do that on a gateway last
year and opened a TAC case just to find out if it was supported and I
was told yes.  As long as there are separate interfaces MGCP can control
some and H.323 can control the others.

 

Scott

 

________________________________

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Wydra, Jason
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 11:30 AM
To: Jonathan Charles
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] H323 and MGCP simultaneously on gateway?

 

Do you know if it's a supported config? This is going to go on a
production gateway.

 

Jason Wydra

Berbee

Cisco Voice Engineer

8725 West Higgins Road, Suite 700

Chicago, Il. 60631

IP phone 773.867.6084

Cell 630-209-9792

Jason.Wydra at berbee.com

www.berbee.com

________________________________

From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonvoip at gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 10:27 AM
To: Wydra, Jason
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] H323 and MGCP simultaneously on gateway?

 

That should work, as long as the interface isn't under MGCP control, you
should be okay to run H.323 on it.




Jonathan

On 12/15/06, Wydra, Jason <jason.wydra at berbee.com> wrote:

I'm going to try it and I will post the results.

 

Jason Wydra

Berbee

Cisco Voice Engineer

8725 West Higgins Road, Suite 700

Chicago , Il. 60631

IP phone 773.867.6084

Cell 630-209-9792

Jason.Wydra at berbee.com 

www.berbee.com 

________________________________

From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonvoip at gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 9:48 AM
To: Wydra, Jason
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] H323 and MGCP simultaneously on gateway?

 

However,

Theoretically, if you had H.323 dial-peers (without the service mgcp),
they should match any H.323 calls that hit the gateway.

So, if you created two different route-lists one for MGCP and one for
H.323 and sent calls to the same gateway, they both should work.


HOWEVER,

If the controller T1 says service mgcp after the timeslots command,
there is a high probability that H.323 will NOT work (as the circuit is
being controlled by CCM). 

What could work is if you had a PRI and a T1 CAS and controlled the PRI
via MGCP and the T1 CAS via H.323...

But I would need to see it actually doing stuff before believing it
would work... 


Jonathan 

On 12/15/06, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip at gmail.com> wrote:

So, I guess that wouldn't be 'simultaneously...'



Jonathan

 

On 12/15/06, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip at gmail.com > wrote:

I have done it.

Configured both and set the H.323 as a second choice on the route list,
and then killed MGCP, calls still worked fine. 




Jonathan

On 12/15/06, Wydra, Jason <jason.wydra at berbee.com> wrote:

	Can you? I guess the better question is if it's supported.

	 

	Jason Wydra

	Berbee

	Cisco Voice Engineer

	8725 West Higgins Road, Suite 700

	Chicago, Il . 60631

	IP phone 773.867.6084

	Cell 630-209-9792

	Jason.Wydra at berbee.com 

	www.berbee.com

	 

	
	_______________________________________________
	cisco-voip mailing list
	cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
	https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

 

 

 

 




-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20061215/b6eb8f9f/attachment-0001.html