[cisco-voip] Communicator G.729 vs G.711

[Carter, Bill]

I always use G.729.  G.711 may work most of the time, but I worry about
scalability etc. with the Internet connection.
 
To force all IP Communicator calls to use G.729, Create a Device Pool
"IP Communicator" and a Region of "IP Communicator" and have that region
use G.729 with everyone else.
 
If your issues are transcoding resources, I have also seen customers
convert all internal phone-2-phone and GW-2-phone to G.729.  I/They
can't tell a difference in voice quality between 711 and 729.  The only
drawback with 729 is audio quality with MoH.

________________________________

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons
(US)
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 7:57 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Communicator G.729 vs G.711



Question: Is it possible to have all the calls that are coming though
VPN using the IP communicator use G.729?

 

Can anyone argue a point of picking one codec over another for IP
Communicator with Cisco VPN Client?  I've used both with success.

 

Issues with G.729 are Transcoding Resources

 

 

 

 

 

________________________________

Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee,
you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in
error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20061025/1e339c11/attachment.html