[cisco-voip] 4506 switchport config for 7936

[Jonathan Charles]

Not a problem if you do the following:

int fa0/47
 switchport access vlan 400
 switchport voice vlan 400


Keep em the same, marking will work fine.



Jonathan

On 10/26/06, Casanova, Chase <ccasanova at rti.org> wrote:
>
>  The reason I am asking is because we are having some intermittent issues
> with a few of our 7936's and I am trying to correlate some similarities in
> setups.
>
>
>
> Would not having the voice vlan on a port cause any auto qos problems?
> The switchport should still be able to tell that the device is a cisco-phone
> even though it is not using the voice vlan, correct?
>
>
>
> -C
>   ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca]
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 26, 2006 11:24 AM
> *To:* Jonathan Charles
> *Cc:* Casanova, Chase; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] 4506 switchport config for 7936
>
>
>
> I've heard this from a few places, for us, we haven't had any problems.
> Wierd.
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> "I can eat fifty eggs." "Nobody can eat fifty eggs."
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
>
> *From:* Jonathan Charles <jonvoip at gmail.com>
>
> *To:* Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
>
> *Cc:* Casanova, Chase <ccasanova at rti.org> ; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 26, 2006 11:18 AM
>
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] 4506 switchport config for 7936
>
>
>
> I have found that with the 7935 and 7936s that they do not particularly
> like an access and voice vlan together on a port... just configure the port
> for access on the voice vlan...
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On 10/24/06, *Lelio Fulgenzi* <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
>
> It all depends on your security model. Why configure a port differently
> than all your other ports? I don't think there is any added value and quite
> honestly, I think there's more harm than anything. Port management is a big
> deal around here, so the easier the config the better. By sticking with a
> standard, you can move your device to any port and it works and you can move
> any device, laptop or phone, to that port and it works.
>
>
>
> My (much more than) two cents...
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> "I can eat fifty eggs." "Nobody can eat fifty eggs."
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
>
> *From:* Casanova, Chase <ccasanova at rti.org>
>
> *To:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 24, 2006 3:33 PM
>
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] 4506 switchport config for 7936
>
>
>
> Since the 7936's don't have PC ports, is there a reason to setup a voice
> vlan on the switchport or is just setting the switchport up as access vlan
> with the access vlan being the voice vlan enough?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -C
>   ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20061026/620805d2/attachment-0001.html