[cisco-voip] Caller ID from analog lines

[Mike Wydra]

Yes that is true. H.323 provides caller ID from FXO but MGCP does not.

On 4/5/07, Ed Leatherman <ealeatherman at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think you need to use H323 for callerID to work on the FXO ports. I'll
> go look thru my notes after lunch unless someone else can confirm that.
>
> On 4/5/07, Pennington, Craig <cpennington at ncaa.org> wrote:
>
> >  I remember this was discussed a few weeks ago.  I did not pay close
> > attention then since I had never had any requests relating to caller ID on
> > analog lines but of course now I have one.  Please remind me what the issue
> > is with not getting caller ID passed on when the call comes in an analog
> > line.  In our case our 2 remote offices have analog lines going into
> > a vic2-4fxo in a 2821 router.
> >
> >  Craig Pennington
> > Network Engineer
> > *N*ational *C*ollegiate *A*thletic *A*ssociation
> > cpennington at ncaa.org
> > www.ncaa.org
> >
> >
> > This email and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged
> > information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the
> > sender immediately by return email, delete this message and destroy any
> > copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other
> > than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Ed Leatherman
> Senior Voice Engineer
> West Virginia University
> Telecommunications and Network Operations
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20070405/cd8ced9a/attachment.html