[cisco-voip] Cisco Untiy 4.0.5 installation
cisco.voip
cisco.voip at verizon.net
Mon Dec 10 23:37:50 EST 2007
Can someone get me started with installation of Cisco Unity 4.0.5.
I have download the cd from CCO, but it seems to want active diretory
installed and exchange 2003.
Could someone give me quick steps to get the unity going, I am trying to get
some experience with the
product in short time.
Thanks,
----- Original Message -----
From: <cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net>
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 9:22 PM
Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 58, Issue 57
> Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> cisco-voip-owner at puck.nether.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Unity 4.x to 5.x (Pat Hayes)
> 2. Re: FXO goes to dial tone. (Nikola Stojsin)
> 3. Re: Unity 4.x to 5.x (Jonathan Charles)
> 4. Re: Unity 4.x to 5.x (Jonathan Charles)
> 5. Re: CUCM6 - Click to Dial (Matt Slaga (US))
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 20:05:51 -0500
> From: Pat Hayes <pat-cv at wcyv.com>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity 4.x to 5.x
> To: Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> Cc: ciscovoip <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Message-ID: <475DE26F.8040501 at wcyv.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Are you sure you had everything installed on the right partitions? The
> 4.x install docs say the C: partition should really only have the OS and
> the page file. All applications, including SQL and Exchange, get
> installed on the other partition(s). I've been able to squeeze it in
> there, not to say it isn't getting a little tight. Looks like the new
> PCDs and the 5.x install docs do a 12 gig partition :-)
>
> For problems accessing SA web and IIS locking up, there were a bunch of
> bugs in 4.2, and not all of the fixes made it into the base 5.0 install,
> you'll need to request the 5.0 ES from TAC.
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> From: "Scott Voll" <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> To: ciscovoip <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Unity 4.x to 5.x
> Date: 12/10/2007 7:17 PM
>
>> OK--
>>
>> just a follow up to my unity 4 to 5 upgrade on friday:
>>
>> Good news --> its done!
>>
>> not so good news --> if you did things like cisco said to with partition
>> size with unity 4 with a 8 gig C: partition ........... your screwed ;-o
>>
>> I had to DiRT backup. reload from scratch (I made a large c: partion so
>> I don't deal with this again) and bring it up to where I was previously
>> and do a DiRT restore then processed to upgrade to Unity 5.x.
>>
>> Some other not so good news --> it looks like in my upgrade my Call
>> handlers lost there transfer to numbers. Ie --> transfer to my cell
>> call handler did not have my cell number.
>>
>> Couple other things I'm working on. WEB/SA is failing with too many
>> active sessions. I will open a TAC case unless someone else knows how
>> to fix it. resetting WWW / IIS is not going to work. I seen bug
>> CSCae07805 but that looks to be an old bug.
>>
>> After I get this stuff fixed maybe I can play with the new features ;-)
>>
>> Scott
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 18:44:49 -0500
> From: "Nikola Stojsin" <nikola at worldnet.att.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FXO goes to dial tone.
> To: "'Scott Voll'" <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> Cc: 'ciscovoip' <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Message-ID: <005801c83b86$a74b5e50$4c4d2cd0 at T42p>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> If you are using MGCP, there should be "Attendant DN" option in CM.
>
>
>
> Nikola
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Nikola Stojsin
> PhD CCIE #12888
> Nikola at att.net
> (917) 558-1423
>
> (917) 591-9382 (fax)
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Voll
> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 6:42 PM
> To: Paul Choi
> Cc: ciscovoip
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FXO goes to dial tone.
>
>
>
> is that for H323? I'm using MGCP.
>
>
>
> Scott
>
> On Dec 10, 2007 3:21 PM, Paul Choi <asobihoudai at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> I think the command which you're searching for is
> plar.
>
> You likely want the FXO to connect to an internal
> phone number as soon as there's a connection to the
> FXO port.
>
>
> --- Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Sorry for the dumb question but for the life of me I
>> can't remember the
>> answer.
>>
>> I have a FXO on a 2800 vgw that when the call comes
>> in rather then go to the
>> DN it just gives me Dial tone. I think there must
>> be a command I'm
>> forgetting. the VGW is registered but doesn't
>> transfer to the incoming DN.
>>
>> TIA
>>
>> Scott
>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________
> ________
> Be a better friend, newshound, and
> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
> <http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ>
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20071210/eb4cb2dd/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 19:12:36 -0600
> From: "Jonathan Charles" <jonvoip at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity 4.x to 5.x
> To: "Scott Voll" <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> Cc: ciscovoip <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Message-ID:
> <5d093f9a0712101712g38d483ffj4f6466681e82386c at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> I did a Unity 4 to 5 upgrade this weekend too... not too bad...
>
> Upgraded Unity 4.0.4 to Unity 4.2.1, ran DRT, used the platform discs
> for the new box, installed 4.2.1, restored and upgraded to 5...
>
> I didn't used to upgrade to 4.2.1, but I do now, after numerous
> nightmares..
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Dec 10, 2007 6:17 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com> wrote:
>> OK--
>>
>> just a follow up to my unity 4 to 5 upgrade on friday:
>>
>> Good news --> its done!
>>
>> not so good news --> if you did things like cisco said to with partition
>> size with unity 4 with a 8 gig C: partition ........... your screwed ;-o
>>
>> I had to DiRT backup. reload from scratch (I made a large c: partion so
>> I
>> don't deal with this again) and bring it up to where I was previously and
>> do
>> a DiRT restore then processed to upgrade to Unity 5.x.
>>
>> Some other not so good news --> it looks like in my upgrade my Call
>> handlers lost there transfer to numbers. Ie --> transfer to my cell call
>> handler did not have my cell number.
>>
>> Couple other things I'm working on. WEB/SA is failing with too many
>> active
>> sessions. I will open a TAC case unless someone else knows how to fix
>> it.
>> resetting WWW / IIS is not going to work. I seen bug CSCae07805 but that
>> looks to be an old bug.
>>
>> After I get this stuff fixed maybe I can play with the new features ;-)
>>
>> Scott
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 19:13:31 -0600
> From: "Jonathan Charles" <jonvoip at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity 4.x to 5.x
> To: "Pat Hayes" <pat-cv at wcyv.com>
> Cc: ciscovoip <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Message-ID:
> <5d093f9a0712101713w2241e71fw7d07a305a8b9f12c at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> There is an ES for 5.0 that fixes the Win2K3 bug (also one for 4.0,
> but it gives a warning that it is for testing only...)
>
>
>
> J
>
> On Dec 10, 2007 7:05 PM, Pat Hayes <pat-cv at wcyv.com> wrote:
>> Are you sure you had everything installed on the right partitions? The
>> 4.x install docs say the C: partition should really only have the OS and
>> the page file. All applications, including SQL and Exchange, get
>> installed on the other partition(s). I've been able to squeeze it in
>> there, not to say it isn't getting a little tight. Looks like the new
>> PCDs and the 5.x install docs do a 12 gig partition :-)
>>
>> For problems accessing SA web and IIS locking up, there were a bunch of
>> bugs in 4.2, and not all of the fixes made it into the base 5.0 install,
>> you'll need to request the 5.0 ES from TAC.
>>
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> From: "Scott Voll" <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
>> To: ciscovoip <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
>> Subject: [cisco-voip] Unity 4.x to 5.x
>> Date: 12/10/2007 7:17 PM
>>
>> > OK--
>> >
>> > just a follow up to my unity 4 to 5 upgrade on friday:
>> >
>> > Good news --> its done!
>> >
>> > not so good news --> if you did things like cisco said to with
>> > partition
>> > size with unity 4 with a 8 gig C: partition ........... your screwed
>> > ;-o
>> >
>> > I had to DiRT backup. reload from scratch (I made a large c: partion
>> > so
>> > I don't deal with this again) and bring it up to where I was previously
>> > and do a DiRT restore then processed to upgrade to Unity 5.x.
>> >
>> > Some other not so good news --> it looks like in my upgrade my Call
>> > handlers lost there transfer to numbers. Ie --> transfer to my cell
>> > call handler did not have my cell number.
>> >
>> > Couple other things I'm working on. WEB/SA is failing with too many
>> > active sessions. I will open a TAC case unless someone else knows how
>> > to fix it. resetting WWW / IIS is not going to work. I seen bug
>> > CSCae07805 but that looks to be an old bug.
>> >
>> > After I get this stuff fixed maybe I can play with the new features ;-)
>> >
>> > Scott
>> >
>> >
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > cisco-voip mailing list
>> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:21:09 -0500
> From: "Matt Slaga \(US\)" <Matt.Slaga at us.didata.com>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM6 - Click to Dial
> To: "Voice Noob" <voicenoob at gmail.com>, "Justin Steinberg"
> <jsteinberg at gmail.com>
> Cc: "Wolfe, Robert" <rwolfe at burwood.com>, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Message-ID:
> <C1FE15183DA37645BC0633BC604E44F007BDB19D at USNAEXCH.na.didata.local>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> To use CUPC, you must have CUPS.
>
>
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Voice Noob
> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 5:59 PM
> To: Justin Steinberg
> Cc: Wolfe, Robert; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM6 - Click to Dial
>
>
>
> Do you have to use Presense server for CUPC or can you use just CCM 6.0?
>
> On Dec 10, 2007 4:54 PM, Justin Steinberg <jsteinberg at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Cisco Unified Personal Communicator has a nice hook into Outlook for
> click to dial. CUPC can operate in Deskphone/CTI or Softphone mode.
>
>
> On Dec 10, 2007 5:22 PM, Wolfe, Robert <rwolfe at burwood.com> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Does anyone know of an application other than LiteScape that offers
> Click-to-Dial functionality in Communications Manager 6.0? We queried
> Citrix on their Application Gateway, but it seems that they are six
> months out in terms of a final release.
>>
>> The functionality that we are looking for is primarily click to dial
> from Outlook and IE. We have demoed the TSP solution for the client,
> but that is obviously not the most elegant way to do things.
>>
>> Any info greatly appreciated!
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> -rob
>>
>> Rob Wolfe|Consultant | burwood group, inc.
>
>> rwolfe@<nospam> burwood.com <http://burwood.com/> | Work: 312 327
> 4634| Cell: 312 5930605| Fax: 312 327 4601
>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> <mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net> ] On Behalf Of
> cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
>> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 4:02 PM
>> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 58, Issue 51
>>
>> Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> cisco-voip-owner at puck.nether.net
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Re: CallManager LAN QOS Question (steve.siltman at assurant.com)
>> 2. Re: CallManager LAN QOS Question [bcc][faked-from][html-rem]
>> (steve.siltman at assurant.com)
>> 3. Re: CallManager LAN QOS Question [bcc][faked-from][html-rem]
>> (TianLun Song)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:24:42 -0600
>> From: steve.siltman at assurant.com
>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CallManager LAN QOS Question
>> To: "Linsemier, Matthew" <MLinsemier at apcapital.com>
>> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> Message-ID:
>>
> <OF81C4696B.7664E968-ON852573AD.0073B06E-862573AD.0075B457 at assurant.com>
>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>
>> Ahh good catch. I'm seeing different results between sniffer
> products. An
>> older version of Ethereal is showing me the DiffServ field and the
> bits
>> are correct and in both directions. I'm guessing that my distributed
>> sniffer either needs an option enabled or a module paid for.
>>
>> I have one more question so that I better understand.
>>
>> <auto qos voip trust> adds <mls qos trust cos> to the interface.
> Should I
>> change this to <mls qos trust dscp> on all Call Manager interfaces,
> router
>> interfaces and trunks?
>> Would I ever configure dscp on a cisco or avaya ip phone interface?
>>
>> Thanks for the help. I've been sniffing this almost all afternoon.
>>
>> Steve Siltman
>> Assurant Corporate Technology
>> Work: 651-361-4752
>> Cell: 651-336-5563
>> steve.siltman at assurant.com
>>
>>
>>
>> "Linsemier, Matthew" <MLinsemier at apcapital.com>
>> 12/10/2007 01:55 PM
>>
>> To
>> < steve.siltman at assurant.com <mailto:steve.siltman at assurant.com> >,
> <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
>> cc
>>
>> Subject
>> RE: [cisco-voip] CallManager LAN QOS Question
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Are you just sniffing COS? Are the DSCP values correct that
> CallManager
>> is sending out? RTP should be marked as DSCP EF and all SCCP,H.323,
> and
>> SIP should be marked as DSCP C3. What are your DSCP -> COS mappings
> on
>> your switch?
>>
>> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
>> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net ] On Behalf Of
>> steve.siltman at assurant.com
>> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 2:20 PM
>> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: [cisco-voip] CallManager LAN QOS Question
>>
>>
>> Hi All.
>>
>> I implemented QOS on the LAN this weekend in our shop. I configured 6
>> closets running a slew of 3750's and four 6500 CAT switches (with a
> few
>> 6x48 blades). I have one issue so far. I'm sniffing one of the Call
>> Manager interfaces on the switch and all packets coming into the
>> CallManager seem to have the correct COS assigned. All of the packets
>
>> sourced by CallManager are COS = 0. This makes it look like
> CallManager
>> is changing these packets to 0. Did I miss something on CallManager
> that
>> I need to enable? The clusterwide parameters (System - QOS) under
>> Service Parameters is set to Normal Priority, EF, AF41 and CS3.
>>
>> Running CallManager 4.1.3sr5d
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Steve Siltman
>> Assurant Corporate Technology
>> Work: 651-361-4752
>> Cell: 651-336-5563
>> steve.siltman at assurant.com
>>
>>
>>
> ************************************************************************
> **************
>> This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may
> contain legally privileged and/or confidential information intended
> solely for the use of the addressee(s). If the reader of this message is
> not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading,
> dissemination, distribution, copying, forwarding or other use of this
> message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received
> this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete
> this message and all copies and backups thereof.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
> ************************************************************************
> **************
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20071210/d38b65
> 2d/attachment-0001.html
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:29:46 -0600
>> From: steve.siltman at assurant.com
>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CallManager LAN QOS Question
>> [bcc][faked-from][html-rem]
>> To: "Avner Izhar" <aizhar at ccbootcamp.com>
>> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> Message-ID:
>>
> <OF219F0FC7.E68C51D5-ON852573AD.0075A24E-862573AD.00762B14 at assurant.com>
>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>
>> Doesn't the COS bits make up the first 3 bits of the DSCP? I should
> see
>> both if the sniffer lets me. :(
>> It is setup as an access port.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Steve Siltman
>> Assurant Corporate Technology
>> Work: 651-361-4752
>> Cell: 651-336-5563
>> steve.siltman at assurant.com
>>
>>
>>
>> "Avner Izhar" <aizhar at ccbootcamp.com>
>> 12/10/2007 03:17 PM
>>
>> To
>> "Linsemier, Matthew" < MLinsemier at apcapital.com>,
>> <steve.siltman at assurant.com>, <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net >
>> cc
>>
>> Subject
>> RE: [cisco-voip] CallManager LAN QOS Question
> [bcc][faked-from][html-rem]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Call Manager is doing DSCP based marking and not COS based, unless we
> talk
>> about different things and mean the same, it is acting as it should.
>>
>> Have you configured trunk toward the Call Manager? It should be an
> access
>> port.
>>
>> HTH,
>> -------------------------------------------
>> thanks,
>> Avner Izhar
>> CCIE#15999 (Voice), CCVP, CCSI# 31623
>> Technical Instructor
>> CCBOOTCAMP - A Cisco Sponsored Organization (SO)
>> Email: aizhar at ccbootcamp.com
>> Toll Free: 877-654-2243
>> Direct: +1-702-968-5100 = Outside the USA
>> FAX: +1-702-446-8012
>> YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits!
>> Training And Remote Racks: http://www.ccbootcamp.com
> <http://www.ccbootcamp.com/>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
>> [mailto: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> <mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net> ] On Behalf Of Linsemier,
>> Matthew
>> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 11:56
>> To: steve.siltman at assurant.com; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CallManager LAN QOS Question
>> [bcc][faked-from][html-rem]
>>
>> Are you just sniffing COS? Are the DSCP values correct that
> CallManager
>> is sending out? RTP should be marked as DSCP EF and all SCCP,H.323,
> and
>> SIP should be marked as DSCP C3. What are your DSCP -> COS mappings
> on
>> your switch?
>>
>>
>>
>> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
>> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
>> steve.siltman at assurant.com
>> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 2:20 PM
>> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: [cisco-voip] CallManager LAN QOS Question
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi All.
>>
>> I implemented QOS on the LAN this weekend in our shop. I configured 6
>> closets running a slew of 3750's and four 6500 CAT switches (with a
> few
>> 6x48 blades). I have one issue so far. I'm sniffing one of the Call
>
>> Manager interfaces on the switch and all packets coming into the
>> CallManager seem to have the correct COS assigned. All of the packets
>> sourced by CallManager are COS = 0. This makes it look like
> CallManager
>> is changing these packets to 0. Did I miss something on CallManager
>> that I need to enable? The clusterwide parameters (System - QOS)
> under
>> Service Parameters is set to Normal Priority, EF, AF41 and CS3.
>>
>> Running CallManager 4.1.3sr5d
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Steve Siltman
>> Assurant Corporate Technology
>> Work: 651-361-4752
>> Cell: 651-336-5563
>> steve.siltman at assurant.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> ************************************************************************
> **************
>> This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may
> contain legally privileged and/or confidential information intended
> solely for the use of the addressee(s). If the reader of this message is
> not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading,
> dissemination, distribution, copying, forwarding or other use of this
> message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received
> this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete
> this message and all copies and backups thereof.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
> ************************************************************************
> **************
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20071210/abc899
> 78/attachment-0001.html
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:02:04 -0500
>> From: "TianLun Song" <stl911 at gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CallManager LAN QOS Question
>> [bcc][faked-from][html-rem]
>> To: steve.siltman at assurant.com
>> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> Message-ID:
>> <22adde7f0712101402n2f11dc95r8896d1c6f6a93f4a at mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> I think you mean TOS bit instead of COS
>>
>> On Dec 10, 2007 4:29 PM, <steve.siltman at assurant.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Doesn't the COS bits make up the first 3 bits of the DSCP? I should
> see
>> > both if the sniffer lets me. :(
>> > It is setup as an access port.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Steve Siltman
>> > Assurant Corporate Technology
>> > Work: 651-361-4752
>> > Cell: 651-336-5563
>> > steve.siltman at assurant.com
>> >
>> >
>> > *"Avner Izhar" < aizhar at ccbootcamp.com
> <mailto:aizhar at ccbootcamp.com> >*
>> >
>> > 12/10/2007 03:17 PM
>> > To
>> > "Linsemier, Matthew" <MLinsemier at apcapital.com>, <
>> > steve.siltman at assurant.com>, <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> cc
>> > Subject
>> > RE: [cisco-voip] CallManager LAN QOS Question
> [bcc][faked-from][html-rem]
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Call Manager is doing DSCP based marking and not COS based, unless
> we talk
>> > about different things and mean the same, it is acting as it should.
>
>> >
>> > Have you configured trunk toward the Call Manager? It should be an
> access
>> > port.
>> >
>> > HTH,
>> > -------------------------------------------
>> > thanks,
>> > Avner Izhar
>> > CCIE#15999 (Voice), CCVP, CCSI# 31623
>> > Technical Instructor
>> > CCBOOTCAMP - A Cisco Sponsored Organization (SO)
>> > Email: aizhar at ccbootcamp.com
>> > Toll Free: 877-654-2243
>> > Direct: +1-702-968-5100 = Outside the USA
>> > FAX: +1-702-446-8012
>> > YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits!
>> > Training And Remote Racks: http://www.ccbootcamp.com
> <http://www.ccbootcamp.com/>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
>> > cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Linsemier, Matthew
>> > Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 11:56
>> > To: steve.siltman at assurant.com; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CallManager LAN QOS Question
>> > [bcc][faked-from][html-rem]
>> >
>> > Are you just sniffing COS? Are the DSCP values correct that
> CallManager
>> > is sending out? RTP should be marked as DSCP EF and all SCCP,H.323
> , and
>> > SIP should be marked as DSCP C3. What are your DSCP -> COS mappings
> on
>> > your switch?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
>> > [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
>> > steve.siltman at assurant.com
>> > Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 2:20 PM
>> > To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> > Subject: [cisco-voip] CallManager LAN QOS Question
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Hi All.
>> >
>> > I implemented QOS on the LAN this weekend in our shop. I configured
> 6
>> > closets running a slew of 3750's and four 6500 CAT switches (with a
> few
>> > 6x48 blades). I have one issue so far. I'm sniffing one of the
> Call
>> > Manager interfaces on the switch and all packets coming into the
>> > CallManager seem to have the correct COS assigned. All of the
> packets
>> > sourced by CallManager are COS = 0. This makes it look like
> CallManager
>> > is changing these packets to 0. Did I miss something on CallManager
>> > that I need to enable? The clusterwide parameters (System - QOS)
> under
>> > Service Parameters is set to Normal Priority, EF, AF41 and CS3.
>> >
>> > Running CallManager 4.1.3sr5d
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Steve Siltman
>> > Assurant Corporate Technology
>> > Work: 651-361-4752
>> > Cell: 651-336-5563
>> > steve.siltman at assurant.com
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ------------------------------
>> > This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may
> contain
>> > legally privileged and/or confidential information intended solely
> for the
>> > use of the addressee(s). If the reader of this message is not the
> intended
>> > recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination,
>> > distribution, copying, forwarding or other use of this message or
> its
>> > attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> message in
>> > error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message
> and all
>> > copies and backups thereof.
>> >
>> > Thank you.
>> > ------------------------------
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > cisco-voip mailing list
>> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> TianLun Song
>> CCVP, CCNP, M.Eng
>> Cell:1-416-829-3630
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20071210/c41841
> c7/attachment.html
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>> End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 58, Issue 51
>> ******************************************
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------
> Disclaimer:
>
> This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
> confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
> designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
> intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
> this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
> this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
> unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
> notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
> from your computer. Thank you.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20071210/26ab5c94/attachment.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 58, Issue 57
> ******************************************
>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list