[cisco-voip] Cisco Untiy 4.0.5 installation
TianLun Song
stl911 at gmail.com
Mon Dec 10 23:48:16 EST 2007
Here is the link of Unity Installation Guide
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/unity/404/installation/guide/ex/ex.html
On Dec 10, 2007 11:37 PM, cisco.voip <cisco.voip at verizon.net> wrote:
> Can someone get me started with installation of Cisco Unity 4.0.5.
> I have download the cd from CCO, but it seems to want active diretory
> installed and exchange 2003.
> Could someone give me quick steps to get the unity going, I am trying to
> get
> some experience with the
> product in short time.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net>
> To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 9:22 PM
> Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 58, Issue 57
>
>
> > Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > cisco-voip-owner at puck.nether.net
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> > 1. Re: Unity 4.x to 5.x (Pat Hayes)
> > 2. Re: FXO goes to dial tone. (Nikola Stojsin)
> > 3. Re: Unity 4.x to 5.x (Jonathan Charles)
> > 4. Re: Unity 4.x to 5.x (Jonathan Charles)
> > 5. Re: CUCM6 - Click to Dial (Matt Slaga (US))
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 20:05:51 -0500
> > From: Pat Hayes <pat-cv at wcyv.com>
> > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity 4.x to 5.x
> > To: Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> > Cc: ciscovoip <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> > Message-ID: <475DE26F.8040501 at wcyv.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> >
> > Are you sure you had everything installed on the right partitions? The
> > 4.x install docs say the C: partition should really only have the OS and
> > the page file. All applications, including SQL and Exchange, get
> > installed on the other partition(s). I've been able to squeeze it in
> > there, not to say it isn't getting a little tight. Looks like the new
> > PCDs and the 5.x install docs do a 12 gig partition :-)
> >
> > For problems accessing SA web and IIS locking up, there were a bunch of
> > bugs in 4.2, and not all of the fixes made it into the base 5.0 install,
> > you'll need to request the 5.0 ES from TAC.
> >
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > From: "Scott Voll" <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> > To: ciscovoip <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> > Subject: [cisco-voip] Unity 4.x to 5.x
> > Date: 12/10/2007 7:17 PM
> >
> >> OK--
> >>
> >> just a follow up to my unity 4 to 5 upgrade on friday:
> >>
> >> Good news --> its done!
> >>
> >> not so good news --> if you did things like cisco said to with
> partition
> >> size with unity 4 with a 8 gig C: partition ........... your screwed
> ;-o
> >>
> >> I had to DiRT backup. reload from scratch (I made a large c: partion
> so
> >> I don't deal with this again) and bring it up to where I was previously
> >> and do a DiRT restore then processed to upgrade to Unity 5.x.
> >>
> >> Some other not so good news --> it looks like in my upgrade my Call
> >> handlers lost there transfer to numbers. Ie --> transfer to my cell
> >> call handler did not have my cell number.
> >>
> >> Couple other things I'm working on. WEB/SA is failing with too many
> >> active sessions. I will open a TAC case unless someone else knows how
> >> to fix it. resetting WWW / IIS is not going to work. I seen bug
> >> CSCae07805 but that looks to be an old bug.
> >>
> >> After I get this stuff fixed maybe I can play with the new features ;-)
> >>
> >> Scott
> >>
> >>
> >>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cisco-voip mailing list
> >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 18:44:49 -0500
> > From: "Nikola Stojsin" <nikola at worldnet.att.net>
> > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FXO goes to dial tone.
> > To: "'Scott Voll'" <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> > Cc: 'ciscovoip' <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> > Message-ID: <005801c83b86$a74b5e50$4c4d2cd0 at T42p>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >
> > If you are using MGCP, there should be "Attendant DN" option in CM.
> >
> >
> >
> > Nikola
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> > Nikola Stojsin
> > PhD CCIE #12888
> > Nikola at att.net
> > (917) 558-1423
> >
> > (917) 591-9382 (fax)
> > ------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _____
> >
> > From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> > [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Voll
> > Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 6:42 PM
> > To: Paul Choi
> > Cc: ciscovoip
> > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FXO goes to dial tone.
> >
> >
> >
> > is that for H323? I'm using MGCP.
> >
> >
> >
> > Scott
> >
> > On Dec 10, 2007 3:21 PM, Paul Choi <asobihoudai at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > I think the command which you're searching for is
> > plar.
> >
> > You likely want the FXO to connect to an internal
> > phone number as soon as there's a connection to the
> > FXO port.
> >
> >
> > --- Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Sorry for the dumb question but for the life of me I
> >> can't remember the
> >> answer.
> >>
> >> I have a FXO on a 2800 vgw that when the call comes
> >> in rather then go to the
> >> DN it just gives me Dial tone. I think there must
> >> be a command I'm
> >> forgetting. the VGW is registered but doesn't
> >> transfer to the incoming DN.
> >>
> >> TIA
> >>
> >> Scott
> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> cisco-voip mailing list
> >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ____________________________________________________________________________
> > ________
> > Be a better friend, newshound, and
> > know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
> > http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
> > <http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ>
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL:
> >
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20071210/eb4cb2dd/attachment-0001.html
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 19:12:36 -0600
> > From: "Jonathan Charles" <jonvoip at gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity 4.x to 5.x
> > To: "Scott Voll" <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> > Cc: ciscovoip <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> > Message-ID:
> > <5d093f9a0712101712g38d483ffj4f6466681e82386c at mail.gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >
> > I did a Unity 4 to 5 upgrade this weekend too... not too bad...
> >
> > Upgraded Unity 4.0.4 to Unity 4.2.1, ran DRT, used the platform discs
> > for the new box, installed 4.2.1, restored and upgraded to 5...
> >
> > I didn't used to upgrade to 4.2.1, but I do now, after numerous
> > nightmares..
> >
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > On Dec 10, 2007 6:17 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> OK--
> >>
> >> just a follow up to my unity 4 to 5 upgrade on friday:
> >>
> >> Good news --> its done!
> >>
> >> not so good news --> if you did things like cisco said to with
> partition
> >> size with unity 4 with a 8 gig C: partition ........... your screwed
> ;-o
> >>
> >> I had to DiRT backup. reload from scratch (I made a large c: partion
> so
> >> I
> >> don't deal with this again) and bring it up to where I was previously
> and
> >> do
> >> a DiRT restore then processed to upgrade to Unity 5.x.
> >>
> >> Some other not so good news --> it looks like in my upgrade my Call
> >> handlers lost there transfer to numbers. Ie --> transfer to my cell
> call
> >> handler did not have my cell number.
> >>
> >> Couple other things I'm working on. WEB/SA is failing with too many
> >> active
> >> sessions. I will open a TAC case unless someone else knows how to fix
> >> it.
> >> resetting WWW / IIS is not going to work. I seen bug CSCae07805 but
> that
> >> looks to be an old bug.
> >>
> >> After I get this stuff fixed maybe I can play with the new features ;-)
> >>
> >> Scott
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cisco-voip mailing list
> >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >>
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 4
> > Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 19:13:31 -0600
> > From: "Jonathan Charles" <jonvoip at gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity 4.x to 5.x
> > To: "Pat Hayes" <pat-cv at wcyv.com>
> > Cc: ciscovoip <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> > Message-ID:
> > <5d093f9a0712101713w2241e71fw7d07a305a8b9f12c at mail.gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >
> > There is an ES for 5.0 that fixes the Win2K3 bug (also one for 4.0,
> > but it gives a warning that it is for testing only...)
> >
> >
> >
> > J
> >
> > On Dec 10, 2007 7:05 PM, Pat Hayes <pat-cv at wcyv.com> wrote:
> >> Are you sure you had everything installed on the right partitions? The
> >> 4.x install docs say the C: partition should really only have the OS
> and
> >> the page file. All applications, including SQL and Exchange, get
> >> installed on the other partition(s). I've been able to squeeze it in
> >> there, not to say it isn't getting a little tight. Looks like the new
> >> PCDs and the 5.x install docs do a 12 gig partition :-)
> >>
> >> For problems accessing SA web and IIS locking up, there were a bunch of
> >> bugs in 4.2, and not all of the fixes made it into the base 5.0install,
> >> you'll need to request the 5.0 ES from TAC.
> >>
> >>
> >> -------- Original Message --------
> >> From: "Scott Voll" <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> >> To: ciscovoip <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> >> Subject: [cisco-voip] Unity 4.x to 5.x
> >> Date: 12/10/2007 7:17 PM
> >>
> >> > OK--
> >> >
> >> > just a follow up to my unity 4 to 5 upgrade on friday:
> >> >
> >> > Good news --> its done!
> >> >
> >> > not so good news --> if you did things like cisco said to with
> >> > partition
> >> > size with unity 4 with a 8 gig C: partition ........... your screwed
> >> > ;-o
> >> >
> >> > I had to DiRT backup. reload from scratch (I made a large c: partion
> >> > so
> >> > I don't deal with this again) and bring it up to where I was
> previously
> >> > and do a DiRT restore then processed to upgrade to Unity 5.x.
> >> >
> >> > Some other not so good news --> it looks like in my upgrade my Call
> >> > handlers lost there transfer to numbers. Ie --> transfer to my cell
> >> > call handler did not have my cell number.
> >> >
> >> > Couple other things I'm working on. WEB/SA is failing with too many
> >> > active sessions. I will open a TAC case unless someone else knows
> how
> >> > to fix it. resetting WWW / IIS is not going to work. I seen bug
> >> > CSCae07805 but that looks to be an old bug.
> >> >
> >> > After I get this stuff fixed maybe I can play with the new features
> ;-)
> >> >
> >> > Scott
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > cisco-voip mailing list
> >> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cisco-voip mailing list
> >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >>
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 5
> > Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:21:09 -0500
> > From: "Matt Slaga \(US\)" <Matt.Slaga at us.didata.com>
> > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM6 - Click to Dial
> > To: "Voice Noob" <voicenoob at gmail.com>, "Justin Steinberg"
> > <jsteinberg at gmail.com>
> > Cc: "Wolfe, Robert" <rwolfe at burwood.com>, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > Message-ID:
> > <C1FE15183DA37645BC0633BC604E44F007BDB19D at USNAEXCH.na.didata.local>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >
> > To use CUPC, you must have CUPS.
> >
> >
> >
> > From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> > [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Voice Noob
> > Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 5:59 PM
> > To: Justin Steinberg
> > Cc: Wolfe, Robert; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM6 - Click to Dial
> >
> >
> >
> > Do you have to use Presense server for CUPC or can you use just CCM 6.0?
> >
> > On Dec 10, 2007 4:54 PM, Justin Steinberg <jsteinberg at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Cisco Unified Personal Communicator has a nice hook into Outlook for
> > click to dial. CUPC can operate in Deskphone/CTI or Softphone mode.
> >
> >
> > On Dec 10, 2007 5:22 PM, Wolfe, Robert <rwolfe at burwood.com> wrote:
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> Does anyone know of an application other than LiteScape that offers
> > Click-to-Dial functionality in Communications Manager 6.0? We queried
> > Citrix on their Application Gateway, but it seems that they are six
> > months out in terms of a final release.
> >>
> >> The functionality that we are looking for is primarily click to dial
> > from Outlook and IE. We have demoed the TSP solution for the client,
> > but that is obviously not the most elegant way to do things.
> >>
> >> Any info greatly appreciated!
> >>
> >> Best,
> >>
> >> -rob
> >>
> >> Rob Wolfe|Consultant | burwood group, inc.
> >
> >> rwolfe@<nospam> burwood.com <http://burwood.com/> | Work: 312 327
> > 4634| Cell: 312 5930605| Fax: 312 327 4601
> >
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> > cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> > <mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net> ] On Behalf Of
> > cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
> >> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 4:02 PM
> >> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 58, Issue 51
> >>
> >> Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
> >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >>
> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >> cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
> >>
> >> You can reach the person managing the list at
> >> cisco-voip-owner at puck.nether.net
> >>
> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> >> than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
> >>
> >>
> >> Today's Topics:
> >>
> >> 1. Re: CallManager LAN QOS Question (steve.siltman at assurant.com)
> >> 2. Re: CallManager LAN QOS Question [bcc][faked-from][html-rem]
> >> (steve.siltman at assurant.com)
> >> 3. Re: CallManager LAN QOS Question [bcc][faked-from][html-rem]
> >> (TianLun Song)
> >>
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >>
> >> Message: 1
> >> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:24:42 -0600
> >> From: steve.siltman at assurant.com
> >> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CallManager LAN QOS Question
> >> To: "Linsemier, Matthew" <MLinsemier at apcapital.com>
> >> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> Message-ID:
> >>
> > <OF81C4696B.7664E968-ON852573AD.0073B06E-862573AD.0075B457 at assurant.com>
> >>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >>
> >> Ahh good catch. I'm seeing different results between sniffer
> > products. An
> >> older version of Ethereal is showing me the DiffServ field and the
> > bits
> >> are correct and in both directions. I'm guessing that my distributed
> >> sniffer either needs an option enabled or a module paid for.
> >>
> >> I have one more question so that I better understand.
> >>
> >> <auto qos voip trust> adds <mls qos trust cos> to the interface.
> > Should I
> >> change this to <mls qos trust dscp> on all Call Manager interfaces,
> > router
> >> interfaces and trunks?
> >> Would I ever configure dscp on a cisco or avaya ip phone interface?
> >>
> >> Thanks for the help. I've been sniffing this almost all afternoon.
> >>
> >> Steve Siltman
> >> Assurant Corporate Technology
> >> Work: 651-361-4752
> >> Cell: 651-336-5563
> >> steve.siltman at assurant.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> "Linsemier, Matthew" <MLinsemier at apcapital.com>
> >> 12/10/2007 01:55 PM
> >>
> >> To
> >> < steve.siltman at assurant.com <mailto:steve.siltman at assurant.com> >,
> > <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> >> cc
> >>
> >> Subject
> >> RE: [cisco-voip] CallManager LAN QOS Question
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Are you just sniffing COS? Are the DSCP values correct that
> > CallManager
> >> is sending out? RTP should be marked as DSCP EF and all SCCP,H.323,
> > and
> >> SIP should be marked as DSCP C3. What are your DSCP -> COS mappings
> > on
> >> your switch?
> >>
> >> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> >> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net ] On Behalf Of
> >> steve.siltman at assurant.com
> >> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 2:20 PM
> >> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> Subject: [cisco-voip] CallManager LAN QOS Question
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi All.
> >>
> >> I implemented QOS on the LAN this weekend in our shop. I configured 6
> >> closets running a slew of 3750's and four 6500 CAT switches (with a
> > few
> >> 6x48 blades). I have one issue so far. I'm sniffing one of the Call
> >> Manager interfaces on the switch and all packets coming into the
> >> CallManager seem to have the correct COS assigned. All of the packets
> >
> >> sourced by CallManager are COS = 0. This makes it look like
> > CallManager
> >> is changing these packets to 0. Did I miss something on CallManager
> > that
> >> I need to enable? The clusterwide parameters (System - QOS) under
> >> Service Parameters is set to Normal Priority, EF, AF41 and CS3.
> >>
> >> Running CallManager 4.1.3sr5d
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Steve Siltman
> >> Assurant Corporate Technology
> >> Work: 651-361-4752
> >> Cell: 651-336-5563
> >> steve.siltman at assurant.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > ************************************************************************
> > **************
> >> This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may
> > contain legally privileged and/or confidential information intended
> > solely for the use of the addressee(s). If the reader of this message is
> > not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading,
> > dissemination, distribution, copying, forwarding or other use of this
> > message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received
> > this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete
> > this message and all copies and backups thereof.
> >>
> >> Thank you.
> >>
> > ************************************************************************
> > **************
> >> -------------- next part --------------
> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >> URL:
> > https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20071210/d38b65
> > 2d/attachment-0001.html
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 2
> >> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:29:46 -0600
> >> From: steve.siltman at assurant.com
> >> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CallManager LAN QOS Question
> >> [bcc][faked-from][html-rem]
> >> To: "Avner Izhar" <aizhar at ccbootcamp.com>
> >> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> Message-ID:
> >>
> > <OF219F0FC7.E68C51D5-ON852573AD.0075A24E-862573AD.00762B14 at assurant.com>
> >>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >>
> >> Doesn't the COS bits make up the first 3 bits of the DSCP? I should
> > see
> >> both if the sniffer lets me. :(
> >> It is setup as an access port.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Steve Siltman
> >> Assurant Corporate Technology
> >> Work: 651-361-4752
> >> Cell: 651-336-5563
> >> steve.siltman at assurant.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> "Avner Izhar" <aizhar at ccbootcamp.com>
> >> 12/10/2007 03:17 PM
> >>
> >> To
> >> "Linsemier, Matthew" < MLinsemier at apcapital.com>,
> >> <steve.siltman at assurant.com>, <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net >
> >> cc
> >>
> >> Subject
> >> RE: [cisco-voip] CallManager LAN QOS Question
> > [bcc][faked-from][html-rem]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Call Manager is doing DSCP based marking and not COS based, unless we
> > talk
> >> about different things and mean the same, it is acting as it should.
> >>
> >> Have you configured trunk toward the Call Manager? It should be an
> > access
> >> port.
> >>
> >> HTH,
> >> -------------------------------------------
> >> thanks,
> >> Avner Izhar
> >> CCIE#15999 (Voice), CCVP, CCSI# 31623
> >> Technical Instructor
> >> CCBOOTCAMP - A Cisco Sponsored Organization (SO)
> >> Email: aizhar at ccbootcamp.com
> >> Toll Free: 877-654-2243
> >> Direct: +1-702-968-5100 = Outside the USA
> >> FAX: +1-702-446-8012
> >> YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits!
> >> Training And Remote Racks: http://www.ccbootcamp.com
> > <http://www.ccbootcamp.com/>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> >> [mailto: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> > <mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net> ] On Behalf Of Linsemier,
> >> Matthew
> >> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 11:56
> >> To: steve.siltman at assurant.com; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CallManager LAN QOS Question
> >> [bcc][faked-from][html-rem]
> >>
> >> Are you just sniffing COS? Are the DSCP values correct that
> > CallManager
> >> is sending out? RTP should be marked as DSCP EF and all SCCP,H.323,
> > and
> >> SIP should be marked as DSCP C3. What are your DSCP -> COS mappings
> > on
> >> your switch?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> >> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> >> steve.siltman at assurant.com
> >> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 2:20 PM
> >> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> Subject: [cisco-voip] CallManager LAN QOS Question
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi All.
> >>
> >> I implemented QOS on the LAN this weekend in our shop. I configured 6
> >> closets running a slew of 3750's and four 6500 CAT switches (with a
> > few
> >> 6x48 blades). I have one issue so far. I'm sniffing one of the Call
> >
> >> Manager interfaces on the switch and all packets coming into the
> >> CallManager seem to have the correct COS assigned. All of the packets
> >> sourced by CallManager are COS = 0. This makes it look like
> > CallManager
> >> is changing these packets to 0. Did I miss something on CallManager
> >> that I need to enable? The clusterwide parameters (System - QOS)
> > under
> >> Service Parameters is set to Normal Priority, EF, AF41 and CS3.
> >>
> >> Running CallManager 4.1.3sr5d
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Steve Siltman
> >> Assurant Corporate Technology
> >> Work: 651-361-4752
> >> Cell: 651-336-5563
> >> steve.siltman at assurant.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > ************************************************************************
> > **************
> >> This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may
> > contain legally privileged and/or confidential information intended
> > solely for the use of the addressee(s). If the reader of this message is
> > not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading,
> > dissemination, distribution, copying, forwarding or other use of this
> > message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received
> > this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete
> > this message and all copies and backups thereof.
> >>
> >> Thank you.
> >>
> > ************************************************************************
> > **************
> >> -------------- next part --------------
> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >> URL:
> > https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20071210/abc899
> > 78/attachment-0001.html
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 3
> >> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:02:04 -0500
> >> From: "TianLun Song" <stl911 at gmail.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CallManager LAN QOS Question
> >> [bcc][faked-from][html-rem]
> >> To: steve.siltman at assurant.com
> >> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> Message-ID:
> >> <22adde7f0712101402n2f11dc95r8896d1c6f6a93f4a at mail.gmail.com>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >>
> >> I think you mean TOS bit instead of COS
> >>
> >> On Dec 10, 2007 4:29 PM, <steve.siltman at assurant.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Doesn't the COS bits make up the first 3 bits of the DSCP? I should
> > see
> >> > both if the sniffer lets me. :(
> >> > It is setup as an access port.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> >
> >> > Steve Siltman
> >> > Assurant Corporate Technology
> >> > Work: 651-361-4752
> >> > Cell: 651-336-5563
> >> > steve.siltman at assurant.com
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > *"Avner Izhar" < aizhar at ccbootcamp.com
> > <mailto:aizhar at ccbootcamp.com> >*
> >> >
> >> > 12/10/2007 03:17 PM
> >> > To
> >> > "Linsemier, Matthew" <MLinsemier at apcapital.com>, <
> >> > steve.siltman at assurant.com>, <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> cc
> >> > Subject
> >> > RE: [cisco-voip] CallManager LAN QOS Question
> > [bcc][faked-from][html-rem]
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > Call Manager is doing DSCP based marking and not COS based, unless
> > we talk
> >> > about different things and mean the same, it is acting as it should.
> >
> >> >
> >> > Have you configured trunk toward the Call Manager? It should be an
> > access
> >> > port.
> >> >
> >> > HTH,
> >> > -------------------------------------------
> >> > thanks,
> >> > Avner Izhar
> >> > CCIE#15999 (Voice), CCVP, CCSI# 31623
> >> > Technical Instructor
> >> > CCBOOTCAMP - A Cisco Sponsored Organization (SO)
> >> > Email: aizhar at ccbootcamp.com
> >> > Toll Free: 877-654-2243
> >> > Direct: +1-702-968-5100 = Outside the USA
> >> > FAX: +1-702-446-8012
> >> > YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits!
> >> > Training And Remote Racks: http://www.ccbootcamp.com
> > <http://www.ccbootcamp.com/>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> >> > cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Linsemier, Matthew
> >> > Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 11:56
> >> > To: steve.siltman at assurant.com; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CallManager LAN QOS Question
> >> > [bcc][faked-from][html-rem]
> >> >
> >> > Are you just sniffing COS? Are the DSCP values correct that
> > CallManager
> >> > is sending out? RTP should be marked as DSCP EF and all SCCP,H.323
> > , and
> >> > SIP should be marked as DSCP C3. What are your DSCP -> COS mappings
> > on
> >> > your switch?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> >> > [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> >> > steve.siltman at assurant.com
> >> > Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 2:20 PM
> >> > To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> > Subject: [cisco-voip] CallManager LAN QOS Question
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Hi All.
> >> >
> >> > I implemented QOS on the LAN this weekend in our shop. I configured
> > 6
> >> > closets running a slew of 3750's and four 6500 CAT switches (with a
> > few
> >> > 6x48 blades). I have one issue so far. I'm sniffing one of the
> > Call
> >> > Manager interfaces on the switch and all packets coming into the
> >> > CallManager seem to have the correct COS assigned. All of the
> > packets
> >> > sourced by CallManager are COS = 0. This makes it look like
> > CallManager
> >> > is changing these packets to 0. Did I miss something on CallManager
> >> > that I need to enable? The clusterwide parameters (System - QOS)
> > under
> >> > Service Parameters is set to Normal Priority, EF, AF41 and CS3.
> >> >
> >> > Running CallManager 4.1.3sr5d
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> >
> >> > Steve Siltman
> >> > Assurant Corporate Technology
> >> > Work: 651-361-4752
> >> > Cell: 651-336-5563
> >> > steve.siltman at assurant.com
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ------------------------------
> >> > This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may
> > contain
> >> > legally privileged and/or confidential information intended solely
> > for the
> >> > use of the addressee(s). If the reader of this message is not the
> > intended
> >> > recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination,
> >> > distribution, copying, forwarding or other use of this message or
> > its
> >> > attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> > message in
> >> > error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message
> > and all
> >> > copies and backups thereof.
> >> >
> >> > Thank you.
> >> > ------------------------------
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > cisco-voip mailing list
> >> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> TianLun Song
> >> CCVP, CCNP, M.Eng
> >> Cell:1-416-829-3630
> >> -------------- next part --------------
> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >> URL:
> > https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20071210/c41841
> > c7/attachment.html
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cisco-voip mailing list
> >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >>
> >> End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 58, Issue 51
> >> ******************************************
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cisco-voip mailing list
> >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------
> > Disclaimer:
> >
> > This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
> > confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
> > designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
> > intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
> > this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
> > this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
> > unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
> > notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
> > from your computer. Thank you.
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL:
> >
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20071210/26ab5c94/attachment.html
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> > End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 58, Issue 57
> > ******************************************
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
--
TianLun Song
CCVP, CCNP, M.Eng
Cell:1-416-829-3630
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20071210/3a9a4fb7/attachment-0001.html
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list