[cisco-voip] Phone Registration Rejected after adding BLFs on 7914

Thu May 3 01:54:52 EDT 2007

Thanks Ryan,
so there is no way overcoming the problem by editing a parameter or 
something like this?
I have a cluster of 2 CCMs each running 5.0.4.2000-1

Cheers,
Anthony

Ryan Ratliff wrote:
> Sounds like CSCsg12278 - BLF,StationMaxButtonTemplateSize is reached, 
> user gets registration rej.
>
> Looks like the limit is determined by the number of CMs in your CM group.
>
> Fixed in 5.1(1b) and a 5.0(4)ES but you should be running 5.1.1 anyway.
>
> -Ryan
>
> On May 2, 2007, at 11:35 AM, Anthony Kouloglou wrote:
>
> Busy Lamp Fields,
> they monitor a line state of another extension and they are also speed 
> dials.
> I have noticed that i can use only 21 BLFs!!
> When i configure the 22nd, i get registration rejected!
> When i erase one of the 22 BLFS (on the device, 1st 7914 or 2nd 7914) 
> it gets registered again!!
> Here is what i got from debugging:
>
> 05/02/2007 16:59:10.975 CCM|Processing StationReg. regCount: 1 
> DeviceName=SEP001B0CDB3376, TCPPid = [1.100.7.13678], 
> IPAddr=192.168.101.150, Port=50293, Device 
> Controller=[1,60,5904]|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::192.168.101.5><CT::1,100,59,1.1905171><IP::192.168.101.150><DEV::SEP001B0CDB3376><LVL::State 
> Transition><MASK::0020>
> 05/02/2007 16:59:10.975 CCM|StationD:    (0005904) 
> wait_register_StationRegister - Check MAC address & protocolVer (mac=, 
> protocolVer=-2056257527)|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::192.168.101.5><CT::1,100,59,1.1905171><IP::192.168.101.150><DEV::SEP001B0CDB3376><LVL::Detailed><MASK::0800> 
>
> 05/02/2007 16:59:11.035 CCM|ProcessDb - ERROR 
> readStationRegistrationProfileByDeviceName - 
> readStationTspByDeviceName 
> failed|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::192.168.101.5><CT::1,100,59,1.1905171><IP::192.168.101.150><DEV::SEP001B0CDB3376><LVL::Error><MASK::0800> 
>
> 05/02/2007 16:59:11.035 CCM|TspError - Error in TSP. Port IsoEthPort:0 
> Port DSL:0 Name of Device:SEP001B0CDB3376 App ID:Cisco CallManager 
> Cluster ID:StandAloneCluster Node 
> ID:ufbccm|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::192.168.101.5><CT::AlarmSEP001B0CDB3376><DEV::SEP001B0CDB3376><LVL::All><MASK::ffff> 
>
> 05/02/2007 16:59:11.035 CCM|StationD:    (0005904) Error, 
> registrationProfile_discovery_DbStationRegistrationProfileErr|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::192.168.101.5><CT::1,100,59,1.1905171><IP::192.168.101.150><DEV::SEP001B0CDB3376><LVL::Error><MASK::0800> 
>
> 05/02/2007 16:59:11.035 CCM|StationD:    (0005904) RegisterReject 
> text='Error: DB 
> Config'.|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::192.168.101.5><CT::1,100,59,1.1905171><IP::192.168.101.150><DEV::SEP001B0CDB3376><LVL::State 
> Transition><MASK::0020>
> 05/02/2007 16:59:11.076 CCM|StationInit: (0005904) alarmSeverity=2 
> text="24: Name=SEP001B0CDB3376 Load= SCCP41.8-2-2SR1S 
> Last=Phone-Reg-Rej" parm1=0(0) 
> parm2=0(0).|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::192.168.101.5><CT::1,100,59,1.1905172><IP::192.168.101.150><DEV::SEP001B0CDB3376><LVL::State 
> Transition><MASK::0020>
> 05/02/2007 16:59:11.173 CCM|StationInit:   TCPPid = 
> [1.100.7.13678]Socket Broken. 
> DeviceName=SEP001B0CDB3376,IPAddr=192.168.101.150, Port=0xc475, Device 
> Controller=[1,60,5904]|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::192.168.101.5><CT::1,100,59,1.1905171><IP::192.168.101.150><DEV::SEP001B0CDB3376><LVL::Error><MASK::0800> 
>
> 05/02/2007 16:59:11.173 CCM|Closing Station connection 
> DeviceName=SEP001B0CDB3376, TCPPid = [1.100.7.13678], 
> IPAddr=192.168.101.150, Port=50293, Device 
> Controller=[1,60,5904]|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::192.168.101.5><CT::1,100,59,1.1905171><IP::192.168.101.150><DEV::SEP001B0CDB3376><LVL::State 
> Transition><MASK::0020>
> 05/02/2007 16:59:11.174 CCM|DeviceManager:star_DeviceStop 
> Name=SEP001B0CDB3376 Key= 
> RegisterDevice=81|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::192.168.101.5><CT::1,100,59,1.1905171><IP::192.168.101.150><DEV::SEP001B0CDB3376><LVL::Detailed><MASK::ffffff> 
>
> 05/02/2007 16:59:11.174 CCM|DeviceManager:star_DeviceStop Device = 
> SEP001B0CDB3376 not found in the table. 
> RegisterDevice=81|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::192.168.101.5><CT::1,100,59,1.1905171><IP::192.168.101.150><DEV::SEP001B0CDB3376><LVL::Error><MASK::ffffff> 
>
> 05/02/2007 16:59:13.039 CCM|StationInit:   TCPPid = [1.100.7.13678] 
> StationCloseReq received: 
> output|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::192.168.101.5><CT::1,100,59,1.1905171><IP::192.168.101.150><DEV::SEP001B0CDB3376><LVL::State 
> Transition><MASK::0800>
>
>
>
> Paul Choi wrote:
>> Sorry for my density...what are BLFs? Paul --- Anthony Kouloglou 
>> <akoul at dataways.gr> wrote: --------------------------------- Hi, i 
>> have a 7961G running SCCP41.8-2-2SR1S on a ccm 5.0(4) The phone has 
>> also 2 expansion modules 7914 (5.0.2) The phone has only one line and 
>> all the rest are BLF SD (5 from thephone + 2x14 from modules) I have 
>> used 5 first BLFs from the phone, 14 BLFs from the first 7914and 2 
>> from the second. When i try to add more extensions on the rest BLFs 
>> of the second7914 the phones gets unregistered and displays 
>> "Registration Rejected..." Is it some kind of cisco bug?
>>> _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing 
>>> list cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>> __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? 
>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
>> http://mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>