[cisco-voip] FXO Port for overhead paging

[Ted Nugent]

I've personally had zero issues with fxs (I typically push for the valcom
V9970, cheap easy) and only had one pain in the ass with fxo and that was
probably a disconnect between the customer and I and not an issue with the
adapter (I typically push for the valcom V2000 or better for FXO). I've done
a bunch of both fxs and fxo and not had any notable issues with either once
you determine what they have or even better if I had the luxury of a
recommendation. Once you determine what you're interfacing with (fxo,fxs,
loop ground etc…) the configuration is pretty much self explanatory or has
been for me.





On 9/26/07, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
>
> is this with the use of an adapter? the adapter has all these dials and
> knobs that protect agains that sort of stuff.
>
> although a 130db screech would be interesting to see in our animal barns.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jason Aarons (US)" <jason.aarons at us.didata.com>
> To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>; "Countryman, Edward"
> <Edward.Countryman at provena.org>; <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 2:58 PM
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] FXO Port for overhead paging
>
>
> >I would disagree, FXS has limited supervision disconnect, stick with a
> > FXO as best practice. I've seen FXS interfaces get stuck offhook and the
> > paging units screech 130db noise....also ATA behaves differently between
> > CCM and CME, FXO doesn't.
> >
> > -jason
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> > [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 2:54 PM
> > To: Countryman, Edward; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FXO Port for overhead paging
> >
> > save yourself the trouble....get an adapter and use an FXS port. ;)
> >
> > we use the Bogen TAM-B.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Countryman, Edward" <Edward.Countryman at provena.org>
> > To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 2:41 PM
> > Subject: [cisco-voip] FXO Port for overhead paging
> >
> >
> >> Has anyone successfully configured and used an FXO port to access an
> >> overhead paging system?  All I can seem to find are E&M examples.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cisco-voip mailing list
> >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> > -----------------------------------------
> > Disclaimer:
> >
> > This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
> > confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
> > designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
> > intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
> > this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
> > this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
> > unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
> > notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
> > from your computer. Thank you.
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20070930/d68eb300/attachment.html