[cisco-voip] Enable Caller ID UNblock

[David Zhars]

Ryan, here's the response on the 2801:

Macro Exp.: 8*825551212
No match, result=1


Methinks the asterisk may be sort of a "reserved keyword".  (Maybe used as a
wildcard or something)

Thanks for any help!



On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:

> Do the dial-peers on the gateway allow it to route that called party number
> correctly?
> Take your number (ie 8*825555555) and use 'show dialplan number' to verify
> what dial-peer it will match.
>
> -Ryan
>
> On Dec 9, 2008, at 5:27 PM, David Zhars wrote:
>
> The 2801 is in H.323
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:
>
>> Is the 2801 MGCP or H.323?  With discard digits none you are sending
>> 8*82.... to the gateway.  If the telco can't route this it will send back
>> unknown/unallocated number and CUCM will play that tone via Annunciator.
>>
>> -Ryan
>>
>> On Dec 9, 2008, at 4:14 PM, David Zhars wrote:
>>
>> Yes, I have some lines where we block caller ID plugged into my 2801
>> router.
>> When we tried to call a #, that # would not accept calls from people who
>> block their Caller ID.
>> So we tried the *82 suffix, and it did not go through.
>>
>> I have created a route pattern that looks like this:
>> 8.*82[2-9]XXXXXX
>> (users in this building press an 8 for an outside line)
>>
>> My Discard Digits is set to <none>
>>
>> The calls are still not completed (I get the Cisco "call cannot be
>> completed as dialed")
>> Calls should go out the POTS lines on the 2801, so is it that I should be
>> doing something on the 2801 and not in CCM 4.1(3)
>>
>> Thanks anyone!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20081210/217b4562/attachment.html>