[cisco-voip] Outgoing Caller ID, My Router, Telco's PRI

Wed Aug 12 12:08:11 EDT 2009

Yes, sorry, it's MGCP.  So it's as simple as changing the dropdowns,
then?  Good news!

Thanks
jeff

________________________________

From: Wes Sisk [mailto:wsisk at cisco.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 11:04 AM
To: Jeff Ruttman
Cc: Fuermann, Jason; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Outgoing Caller ID, My Router, Telco's PRI

If MGCP gw then CM's parameters make all the difference.  With
"CallManager" value CM inspects the number and attempts to guess proper
plan/type.  Some switches accept 1 plan/type for all calls.  Other
switches require differentiated plan/type per call
(international/national/...).

If h.323 gateway the config on the gateway controls the values.

/Wes

On Wednesday, August 12, 2009 11:30:03 AM , Jeff Ruttman
<ruttmanj at carewisc.org> <mailto:ruttmanj at carewisc.org>  wrote:

	Well I had great success with AT&T looking at this with me, and
indeed we have to send ISDN for plan and National Number for type.
We're currently sending "unknown" for type and plan.  Unknown is fine
for our other 2 AT&T PRIs, but not the one in question.  Has to do with
the switch type said the tech.

	I see in CM 6.1 where to change these on the PRI port on the GW:
Calling party IE number type unknown and Calling Numbering Plan.  Can I
just change these and restart the GW without any other repercussions?
Right now they're set to "Cisco CallManager" and the help page says
basically to leave it alone unless you know about national dialing plans
and such--which I don't really.

	So will this change be as simple as changing the drop down and
restarting the GW?  And should I also change the Called party IE number
type unknown and Called Numbering Plan?

	Thanks
	jeff

________________________________

	From: Fuermann, Jason [mailto:JBF005 at shsu.edu] 
	Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 4:35 PM
	To: 'Wes Sisk'
	Cc: Jeff Ruttman; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
	Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Outgoing Caller ID, My Router, Telco's
PRI

	We were ok sending them "unknown", but 911 didn't work. We have
to override with national ISDN

	From: Wes Sisk [mailto:wsisk at cisco.com] 
	Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 3:16 PM
	To: Fuermann, Jason
	Cc: 'Jeff Ruttman'; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
	Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Outgoing Caller ID, My Router, Telco's
PRI

	only other CPE variable is the calling party number plan and
type.  you may try overriding those. 

	On Tuesday, August 11, 2009 10:53:41 AM , Fuermann, Jason
<JBF005 at shsu.edu> <mailto:JBF005 at shsu.edu>  wrote:

	Definitely an ATT problem if you see it in q391. I know ATT
charges us extra to let us present our DID's. On a side note, good luck
getting ATT to believe you. We deal with them all the time and it's
constantly "you need to check the programming on your side" as if we
hadn't already done that and told them.

	From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeff Ruttman
	Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 9:45 AM
	To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
	Subject: [cisco-voip] Outgoing Caller ID, My Router, Telco's PRI

	Greetings,

	If, when doing a "debug isdn q391" on my voice router, I see the
Calling Party presenting 10 digits to the PRI, then what else on my side
of the Caller ID equation might I alter to have those 10 digits show up
on the Called Party's phone?

	As it stands now, the Called Party sees the number assigned to
the PRI itself and not the external mask configured on the phone, not
the 10 digits I see being presented to the PRI via the debug.

	Other points of interest:

	We have 2 other PRIs from AT&T, and I see the same 10 digits
presented to those 2 other PRIs, and those numbers DO show up on the
Called Party's phone.

	When I send a call out through the problem PRI and call an AT&T
cell phone, I DO SEE the proper caller id on the Called Party phone, but
I do NOT when I call, say a Sprint phone or a Verizon phone.  

	AT&T's response to my questions on the problem PRI:

	We would pass the T16OX number for caller id. It is up to the
customer to program their equipment with the DID number they want to
display. I would have him check with his vendor on his programming. I
don't know what else to suggest to him.

	So anything I can try?  Push back on AT&T?

	Thanks, jeff

	CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this email
including attachments is intended for the specific delivery to and use
by the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and includes information
which should be considered as private and confidential. Any review,
retransmission, dissemination, or taking of any action in reliance upon
this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is
prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please reply to
the sender immediately and delete the original message and any copy of
it from your computer system. Thank you.

________________________________

	_______________________________________________
	cisco-voip mailing list
	cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
	https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

	CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this email
including attachments is intended for the specific delivery to and use
by the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and includes information
which should be considered as private and confidential. Any review,
retransmission, dissemination, or taking of any action in reliance upon
this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is
prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please reply to
the sender immediately and delete the original message and any copy of
it from your computer system. Thank you.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090812/96cd75e6/attachment.html>