[cisco-voip] 7936 voip phone

Mon Dec 7 23:05:44 EST 2009

As a fact the 7936 didn't work even with the latest firmware at the time. Don't have the phone to test to see if it works now.

________________________________
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 9:59 PM
To: Tim Reimers <treimers at ashevillenc.gov>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>; Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>; Fuermann, Jason <JBF005 at shsu.edu>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 7936 voip phone

maybe because documentation group is a different BU? ;)

*ouch*

sorry guys.

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Reimers" <treimers at ashevillenc.gov>
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>, "Jason Fuermann" <JBF005 at shsu.edu>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net, "Matthew Loraditch" <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>
Sent: Monday, December 7, 2009 10:04:46 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] 7936 voip phone

I wish Cisco (note to Wes and Ryan)
was as good as Microsoft is at listing which exact product and IOS versions that a particular document was meant for.

Too many pages on their site show things that only work on older hardware or IOS.
And yes, some pages do mention "lab tested with 12.2 code, factory defaults"

But that's not the same as listing out all the versions of code and types of hardware that would support a given set of commands or configuration.

Microsoft does it --- Cisco is ten times better than Microsoft.

Why does Cisco have to be the BellSouth dinosaur, years behind the mark on documentation relevance and accuracy
when even Microsoft can do better?

Tim Reimers
Systems Analyst II
Information Technology Services
City of Asheville
70 Court Plaza
Asheville, NC 28801
phone - 828-259-5512
treimers at ashevillenc.gov<mailto:timreimers at ashevillenc.gov>

________________________________
From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca]
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 8:49 PM
To: Jason Fuermann
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net; Matthew Loraditch; Tim Reimers
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 7936 voip phone

Thanks for following up Jason. I've seen on more than one occassion documentation saying one thing, then revised to say another. Personally, I know that documentation can be hard to keep up to date, but you'd think something as simple as whether or not a phone model is supported would be fairly easy. ;)

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Fuermann" <JBF005 at shsu.edu>
To: "Matthew Loraditch" <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>, "Tim Reimers" <treimers at ashevillenc.gov>, "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, December 7, 2009 5:19:42 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] 7936 voip phone

Well I found the case and the compatibility matrix I was given.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/compat/ccmcompmatr.html#wp1627480

However, it is looking supported, but the release notes say it was changed

5/29/09

Revised information about upgrading from Cisco Unified Communications Manager Release 5.1(3x) to 7.1(2) in Table 4<http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/compat/ccmcompmatr.html#wp108792>. Revised information on Cisco Unified IP Conference Station 7936G Firmware Version 3.3(10) - SCCP. Replaced Cisco Unified Personal Communicator<http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/compat/ccmcompmatr.html#wp56480> compatibility table in this matrix with cross-reference to compatibility matrix for that product. Revised Table 62<http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/compat/ccmcompmatr.html#wp57448> to add Data Migration Assistant (DMA) Release 7.1(2).

Good to know I guess…(my case was on 7/29/08)

From: Matthew Loraditch [mailto:MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com]
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 4:04 PM
To: Tim Reimers; Lelio Fulgenzi; Fuermann, Jason
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] 7936 voip phone

Well what I had noticed is that it appears they finally removed the character limit on passwords. When I originally typed in my password when I setup my account it was 10 characters, until yesterday a shortened version always worked today  I saw the new signon screen and the 10 character version was required.. which is kinda scary as I think it means the old passwords couldn’t have been hashed….

Matthew Loraditch
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
support at heliontechnologies.com<mailto:support at heliontechnologies.com>
(p) (410) 252-8830
(F) (443) 541-1593

Visit us at www.heliontechnologies.com<http://www.heliontechnologies.com>
Support Issue? Email support at heliontechnologies.com<mailto:support at heliontechnologies.com> for fast assistance!

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tim Reimers
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 4:47 PM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi; Jason Fuermann
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 7936 voip phone

Cisco's website is having issues-

I just had to call and get mine reset to get an IOS image downloaded.

Couldn't even get logged in, they had to reset my CCO pwd myself.

They say they'll have it fixed later on...

Tim Reimers
Systems Analyst II
Information Technology Services
City of Asheville
70 Court Plaza
Asheville, NC 28801
phone - 828-259-5512
treimers at ashevillenc.gov<mailto:timreimers at ashevillenc.gov>

________________________________
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 4:45 PM
To: Jason Fuermann
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 7936 voip phone
Thanks Jason. It would be good to know what they said. I know that TAC is by the letter, so for example, they may say that 7912 is not supported on 7.1(3) b/c of EOL, but we're pretty sure it will work. Or at least we hope so, with 4000 of them. ;)

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Fuermann" <JBF005 at shsu.edu>
To: "ccieid1ot" <ccieid1ot at gmail.com>, "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, December 7, 2009 4:35:55 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] 7936 voip phone

I'm looking for the TAC case (have to reset my password, and it is taking forever). Maybe I remembered the model # wrong. I'll let you know when I find it

-----Original Message-----
From: ccieid1ot [mailto:ccieid1ot at gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 3:16 PM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi
Cc: Fuermann, Jason; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 7936 voip phone

Lelio,

Usually they talk out of their anus.  That's how they came up with it.  :P

On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>> wrote:
> How did you come to this conclusion?
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/compat/ccmcompmatr.html#wp43813
>
> shows default loads for 7935 for 5/6/7 which typically means it's
> compatible.
>
> http://tools.cisco.com/ITDIT/vtgsca/VTGServlet also shows it's compatible.
>
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jason Fuermann" <JBF005 at shsu.edu<mailto:JBF005 at shsu.edu>>
> To: "Matt Slaga (US)" <Matt.Slaga at us.didata.com<mailto:Matt.Slaga at us.didata.com>>, "Robert Shearrill"
> <rshearri at uchicago.edu<mailto:rshearri at uchicago.edu>>, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Monday, December 7, 2009 3:08:51 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 7936 voip phone
>
> Also 7935 is not compatible with anything CUCM  6 up (probably 5 as well). I
> don't have quick access to the compatibility matrix or I would link it.
>
>
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net>
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net]<mailto:%5Bmailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net%5D> On Behalf Of Matt Slaga (US)
> Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 1:58 PM
> To: Robert Shearrill; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 7936 voip phone
>
>
>
> I know with the older 7935s, you had to set the voice vlan manually to
> initially get configured.  Once they get correct firmware, you can put the
> switch ports back to normal.
>
>
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net>
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net]<mailto:%5Bmailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net%5D> On Behalf Of Robert Shearrill
> Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 2:46 PM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: [cisco-voip] 7936 voip phone
>
>
>
> Hi
>
>
>
> Anyone experiencing 7936 phone not registering. showing unknown in cucm. the
> phones that i am having problems with are older phones.part number
> 74-3429-02.. let me know please
>
> ________________________________
>
> Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
> confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
> addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you
> are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and
> that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in
> error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting
> it from your computer. Thank you.
>
> _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>