[cisco-voip] CUCM on Virtual Servers

[Tanner Ezell]

Have you logged into the console of your CUCM server prior to attempting to
access via the web interface?

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Jeff Garvas <jeff at cia.net> wrote:

> voicenoob,
>
> Did you use ESX or ESXi?   I've been trying to install CUCM7 in ESXi on an
> intel box with a gig of memory and an 80gb drive setup for the install.  It
> completed the install and I can login to the console and even ping the
> publisher's IP, but I am unable to get to it with a browser at all.
>
> Is there a trick to addressing in ESXi beyond just assigning an IP to the
> pubilsher during the install?  The management IP of the ESXi box is
> 192.168.1.65/24 and the publisher is 192.168.1.66/24.
>
> How did you setup networking?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Jeff
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Voice Noob <voicenoob at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>  I have UCCX 7.0, MPE 2.1, and Presence 7.0 running in VMWare ESX
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
>> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Ahmed Elnagar
>> *Sent:* Monday, January 12, 2009 11:54 AM
>> *To:* lelio at uoguelph.ca
>> *Cc:* VOIP Group
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM on Virtual Servers
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Actually yes, a friend of mine was installing 7.0 on VMware and it works
>> and we were shocked for this but seems that it is working normally, but as I
>> am preparing for CCIE current blueprint and I am using 4.1 version but
>> anyway it is a good thing that Vmware is working with current version.
>>
>> Regarding the Demo version I think it is the NFR that is orderable for
>> Advanced unified communication partners and it is really amazing it includes
>> a lot of software pack. (software only) with only 275$; yet I think same
>> cisco restriction regarding the platform is still the same.
>>
>> Anyone tried unity connection, IPCC, presence server on VMware??
>>
>> Note: for information about NFR see the below link
>>
>> http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/sell/promotions/uc_system_release_nfr_program.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ahmed Elnagar
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:41:35 -0500
>> From: lelio at uoguelph.ca
>> To: ahmed_elnagar at hotmail.com
>> CC: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net; wsisk at cisco.com; scasper at mtb.com
>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM on Virtual Servers
>>
>> Actually, I believe you can install v7 on VMware now. It installs with
>> special demo licenses and everything. I have not tested this, but this is
>> what I heard.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
>> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
>> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Ahmed Elnagar" <ahmed_elnagar at hotmail.com>
>> To: wsisk at cisco.com, scasper at mtb.com
>> Cc: "VOIP Group" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
>> Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 12:37:32 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM on Virtual Servers
>>
>>
>> I think it would be useful for training and Lab purpose if cisco
>> supported...we are not concerned about system performance or what so ever we
>> just need to have a couple of virtual machines on a single server to reduce
>> lab costs and to always be able to revert to a clean machine state ...I even
>> tried to install CM on vmware on a supported platform but the installation
>> detects that it is a VMware and refuses to install.
>>
>>  Thanks,
>> Ahmed Elnagar
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:25:03 -0500
>> From: wsisk at cisco.com
>> To: SCASPER at mtb.com
>> CC: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM on Virtual Servers
>>
>> it is more in the tradition of cisco documentation.  not stated = not
>> supported.
>>
>> There is a listing of supported platforms per version in the compatiblity
>> section of CM documentation:
>>
>> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps556/products_device_support_tables_list.html
>> Cisco Unified Communications Operating System Supported Server Hardware
>> Compatibility Matrix<http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/compat/mcs-server-os-1204.xls>
>>
>> alas no virtual.
>>
>> primary limiting factor so far: performance and system impact.  how does
>> CM fare with being snapshotted, rolled forward, and rolled backward. ! wo!
>> uld those be 'supported' backup strategies?
>>
>> /wes
>>
>> On Monday, January 12, 2009 12:00:50 PM, STEVEN CASPER <SCASPER at mtb.com><SCASPER at mtb.com>wrote:
>>
>>  Does Cisco have a link or statement somewhere that explains their
>> position as to why their unified applications, in particular Call
>> Manager, are not supported in a virtual server environment for
>> production implementations and why specific hardware specifications must be
>> followed? I know the answers to these questions but I am looking for a Cisco
>> response..
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Steve
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Please consider the impact on our environment before printing this e-mail.
>>
>> ************************************
>>
>> This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information that is intended solely for the use of the addressee.  If you are not the intended recipient or entity, you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing or using any of the information contained in the transmission.  If you received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy.  This communication may contain nonpublic personal information about consumers subject to the restrictions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.  You may not directly or indirectly reuse or disclose such information for any purpose other than to provide the services for which you are receiving the information.
>>
>> There are risks associated with the use of electronic transmission.  The sender of this information does not control the method of transmittal or service providers and assumes no duty or obligation for the security, receipt, or third party interception of this transmission.
>>
>> ************************************
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> See all the ways you can stay connected to friends and family<http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/default.aspx>
>> _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> check out the rest of the Windows Live™. More than mail–Windows Live™ goes
>> way beyond your inbox. More than messages<http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090219/4b6ef662/attachment.html>