[cisco-voip] Local Route Groups without DID

[Chris Ward]

Hi Damien,

It sounds like you want to be masking the calling party at the route pattern
level with no modification at the route list level. I think I might not be
understanding you exact scenario and goal, but that¹s what it sounds like.

Chris Ward 


From: Damien Ball <balld at gcs.k12.nc.us>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 10:15:10 -0400 (EDT)
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Local Route Groups without DID

I'm looking at using local route groups with my call system.  I am currently
masking the calling party information at the Route List.  The reason for
this is that I'm not mapping DIDs to individual phones, but I have all calls
from a specific site masked as one telephone number (which dials back into
the receptionist or UC call handler).  If i'm using one global route list,
is there a way to preserve this configuration or is it a lost cause?  I'm
using Call manager 7.0.2 and Unity Connection 7.0.2.  I am routing these
calls through 2 PRIs (each in different calling areas with different
providers).




_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090501/1c22949d/attachment.html>