[cisco-voip] Cisco Attendant console and CCM version 7

Wed May 27 11:40:26 EDT 2009

As said earlier, BAC, DAC and EAC will only cost more. Although the
Attendant Console bundled with CCM is not Free but it is really good
for basic usage. But even if Cisco sells the DAC at 1000$/seat it is
still an overkill.

If I order 6.1 the attendant console will be there. Please point me if
I am wrong.

On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Bennie Grant <Bennie.Grant at mettoni.com> wrote:
> There were many reasons – the main ones were as follows:
>
>
>
> 1)      Cisco had VERY limited development personnel on the product – it was
> purely being maintained (i.e. no new features)
>
> 2)      Did not have the architecture to support new applications that Cisco
> NEED it to in their System Releases (i.e. CUPS)
>
> 3)      Could not support “right to left” languages
>
> 4)      Did not support JAWS – for the Disabilities Act (as Voice Noob says)
>
> 5)      Has been the cause of a great many CAP cases worldwide
>
> 6)      Simply does not offer the functionality that customers require – was
> a major competitive advantage to other PBX vendors and their Attendant
> Consoles
>
>
>
> Of course, one of Cisco’s considerations is to ensure that it is future
> proof, and also supportable worldwide (languages etc) – all of which the
> CUAC struggled to do
>
>
>
> The bottom line is that the CUAC product could not meet customer
> requirements, was problematic and was not going to be able to improve over
> time as the rest of the Cisco UC suite moves on
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Bennie Grant
> VP - Operations
> Arc Solutions (International) Inc
> Part of the Mettoni group | www.mettoni.com
>
>
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Voice Noob
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 11:17 AM
> To: 'Tanner Ezell'; 'Matthew Loraditch'
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Attendant console and CCM version 7
>
>
>
> Junk!
>
>
>
> I also heard it was due to not meeting the Americans With Disabilities Act.
>
>
>
> From: Tanner Ezell [mailto:tanner.ezell at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 10:10 AM
> To: Matthew Loraditch
> Cc: Voice Noob; Bill Talley; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Attendant console and CCM version 7
>
>
>
> I don't recall seeing it above, but what was the rational of removing AC?
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Matthew Loraditch
> <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com> wrote:
>
> Not necessarily,  I have a customer with 6 operators/receptionists but
> that’s because there are 6 different sites and there is an operator at each
> site.  I’d imagine there are many others with this type of setup.
>
> I have no idea what I’m going to do when it’s time for 8.0, ARC is
> ridiculously expensive for functionality these people have had for free for
> years.
>
>
>
>
>
> Matthew Loraditch
> 1965 Greenspring Drive
>
> Timonium, MD 21093
> support at heliontechnologies.com
> (p) (410) 252-8830
> (F) (443) 541-1593
>
> Visit us at www.heliontechnologies.com
> Support Issue? Email support at heliontechnologies.com for fast assistance!
>
>
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Voice Noob
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 10:55 AM
> To: 'Bill Talley'
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Attendant console and CCM version 7
>
>
>
> Notice the B instead of D. I usually lead in with the CUBAC software. Also
> if you have more than two or three “operators” you probably have a call
> center and are putting the wrong product in for the customer.
>
>
>
> From: Bill Talley [mailto:btalley at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 9:53 AM
> To: Voice Noob
> Cc: Syed Khalid Ali; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Attendant console and CCM version 7
>
>
>
> I thought CUDAC listed at $1395/seat.  I could be wrong, but is that not per
> seat?  There's also added costs for software maintence, the server to run it
> on, hardware maintence for the server, and labor to install it.
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Voice Noob <voicenoob at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> What are you paying $5,000 for? CUBAC is list $1,800 which can scale to
> monitor 500 phones.
>
>
>
> From: Bill Talley [mailto:btalley at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 9:45 AM
>
> To: Voice Noob
> Cc: Syed Khalid Ali; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Attendant console and CCM version 7
>
>
>
> Yes, thanks for the clarification Noob.  I was referencing sales that
> occured prior to April 19 and those scenarios would no longer apply.
>
>
>
> Free goes along when you just need basic functionality of line status, park
> monitor, basic queuing and routing based on attendant availability for only
> or two people and no more than that.   Note the operative term in that
> statement is NOT 'free', it's 'basic'.  In my opinion, the ARC solutions
> don't provide the same basic functionality as attendant console in as simple
> of a way.    I'm not trying to debate which is better, as ARC is a more
> scalable, more capable and probably more stable application.  By saying
> 'basic' I'm including hardware requirements, admin procedures, costs,
> etc.  In the scenarios where we've installed the free Cisco Attendant
> Console, ARC is way overkill.  That's due to either resistence to cost, IT
> staffing levels/skill sets, budgets, hardware availability, etc.
>
>
>
> That being said, as Ryan mentioned, 'the writing's on the wall', and those
> scenarios will have to be dealt with.  However, there should be a better
> alternative for small to medium business with only one or two attendants
> than CUDAC.  Going from free to $5k for basic functionality is a big deal in
> some cases.
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Voice Noob <voicenoob at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It may be “free” but the functionality is very poor compared to the other
> products. Also if you read the fine print it is only supported if you
> purchased and installed before the EOL date. Not if you purchase 6.1.
>
>
>
> From: Bill Talley [mailto:btalley at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 8:47 AM
> To: Voice Noob
> Cc: Syed Khalid Ali; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Attendant console and CCM version 7
>
>
>
> Not speaking for Syed, but we've had clients request UCM 6.1 because Cisco
> Attendant Console is 'free' and supported for a longer period.  With UCM 7,
> at one time anyway, Attendant Console was only supported if the system was
> upgraded from a previous version to UCM 7.x.  Perhaps that's changed?
>
>
>
> AFAIK, CUBAC, CUDAC and CUEAC are a significantly priced add-on, too
> significant for many organizations in our case.
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Voice Noob <voicenoob at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Why would you order 6.1? You can use CUBAC, CUDAC, or CUEAC product
> depending on your needs. They are all from ARC but are sold OEM by Cisco.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Syed Khalid Ali
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 6:18 AM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco Attendant console and CCM version 7
>
> Dear all,
>
> I was checking the data sheet form CCM 7 and they are not bundled any
> more. so what is the alternative.
> I heard they have Enterprise Attendant Console and ARC Console.
>
> If we order version 6.1, do we still need to order the console separately?
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Syed Khalid Ali
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
> *************************************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
> the system manager.  http://www.mettoni.com
>
> Mettoni Ltd
> Registered in England and Wales: 4485956
> 9400 Garsington Road, Oxford Business Park, Oxford, OX4 2HN
> *************************************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>

-- 
Thanks,
Syed Khalid Ali