[cisco-voip] CCM Administration Audit?

[Tom Sparks]

I also am pretty happy with Clarus on the config auditing stuff.  I tried
looking into the trace logs but it's all gobbly gook.
Tom Sparks
Sr. IPT Engineer
Taos Consulting

On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:00 AM, <cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net> wrote:

> Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to cisco-voip at puck.nether.net To
> subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip or, via email, send a
> message with subject or body 'help' to cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.netYou can reach the person managing the list at
> cisco-voip-owner at puck.nether.net When replying, please edit your Subject
> line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
> Today's Topics: 1. CCM Administration Audit? (ROZA, Ariel) 2. UCCX 7.0(1)SR4
> - CAD stuck in loop upgrading client (Matthew Linsemier) 3. Re: CCM
> Administration Audit? (Chris Ward (chrward)) 4. Re: CCM Administration
> Audit? (Ryan Ratliff) 5. Re: CCM Administration Audit? (Cristobal Priego) 6.
> Re: IOS Release 15 Is out (Voice Noob) 7. adding subscriber in the CUCM
> cluster (Scott Kee) 8. HP Server Solutions page on Cisco 7800 MCS
> (Subhrojyoti Banerjee) 9. Re: HP Server Solutions page on Cisco 7800 MCS
> (Lelio Fulgenzi) 10. mobile connect configuration (Charles Goldsmith) 11.
> Re: mobile connect configuration (Chris Ward (chrward)) 12. Re: mobile
> connect configuration (Charles Goldsmith) 13. Re: mobile connect
> configuration (Chris Ward (chrward)) 14. Re: installing windows server 2008
> standard on hp server (anand) 15. Re: mobile connect configuration (Chris
> Ward (chrward)) 16. Re: installing windows server 2008 standard on hp server
> (Robert Knapp) 17. Re: mobile connect configuration (Charles Goldsmith) 18.
> Re: mobile connect configuration (Voice Noob) 19. Re: another question for
> the cisco folk (Subhrojyoti Banerjee) 20. Re: mobile connect configuration
> (Robert Singleton) 21. Re: mobile connect configuration (Chris Ward
> (chrward)) 22. Re: installing windows server 2008 standard on hp server
> (anand) 23. 7962 Registration Issues with 7.1.2.32014-1 ? (Jason Aarons
> (US)) 24. Nortel Translator (Jason Aarons (US)) 25. Resolved: 7962
> Registration Issues with 7.1.2.32014-1 ? (Jason Aarons (US)) 26. Re: Nortel
> Translator (Philip Walenta) 27. Re: Nortel Translator (Matt Slaga (US)) 28.
> Re: adding subscriber in the CUCM cluster (Adam Frankel) 29. OT Hypothetical
> USB question (Carter, Bill) 30. Re: OT Hypothetical USB question (Jason
> Aarons (US)) 31. Re: OT Hypothetical USB question (Carter, Bill) 32. Re: OT
> Hypothetical USB question (Philip Walenta) 33. Re: OT Hypothetical USB
> question (Carter, Bill) 34. CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling (Jeff) 35. Re: Cisco
> CRS Development interuption? (Arnold Lesar) 36. Re: CCIE Voice Lab
> Scheduling (Chris Ward (chrward)) 37. Re: CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling (Daniel
> Rodriguez) 38. Re: another question for the cisco folk (Wes Sisk) 39. Re:
> another question for the cisco folk (Lelio Fulgenzi) 40. Re: CCIE Voice Lab
> Scheduling (Daniel Rodriguez) 41. Re: connection bugs? (Pat Hayes) 42. cisco
> unified mobility advantage (Dane Newman) 43. Re: adding subscriber in the
> CUCM cluster (Scott Kee) 44. Cisco VG204/202 & Hylafax (Kim, Hyoun S) 45.
> Re: VoIP Monitoring tool (Daniel Durkin) 46. Re: connection bugs? (Lelio
> Fulgenzi) 47. Re: CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling (Jeff) 48. Cobras export/import
> to Unity 7 UM (Mike Lydick) 49. Bulk Subscription (Tim Fulton) 50. Re: CCIE
> Voice Lab Scheduling (Voice Noob) 51. Re: Cobras export/import to Unity 7 UM
> (Voice Noob)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Message: 1 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:29:39 -0300 From: "ROZA, Ariel" To:
> Subject: [cisco-voip] CCM Administration Audit? Message-ID: Content-Type:
> text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hi! I was wondering what kind of method do
> you guys use when needed to audit the CCM Administration pages (to know when
> someone modified/addeed a phone or a gateway, for example) I have been
> requested this by several customers, and as far as my knowledge goes there
> is no straightforward Auditing setting in CCM. Regards, Ariel ARIEL ROZA
> Postsales Support Engineer LOGICALIS Paseo Col?n 707 - C.A.B.A. - Argentina
> - C1063ACH Tel/Fax: +54 (11) 4344-0400 ariel.roza at la.logicalis.com
> www.la.logicalis.com www.logicalisnow.com Por favor, piense en el
> medioambiente antes de imprimir este email. La presente informaci?n se env?a
> ?nicamente para el destinatario, y contiene informaci?n de car?cter
> CONFIDENCIAL o PRIVLEGIADA. La modificaci?n, retransmisi?n, difus?n, copia u
> otro uso de esta informaci?n por cualquier medio, por personas distintas al
> destinatario, est?n estrictamente prohibidas. -------------- next part
> -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
> ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:27:29
> -0400 From: Matthew Linsemier To: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" Subject:
> [cisco-voip] UCCX 7.0(1)SR4 - CAD stuck in loop upgrading client Message-ID:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" All, We recently upgraded to
> UCCX 7.0(1)SR4 to stay in line with a recent 7.1(3) upgrade. The upgrades
> went fine, however we are running into an issue upgrading some of our CAD
> clients for UCCX. Usually, the process is where we make the users
> administrators of their machines, they log in, click on Cisco Agent Desktop,
> it notices there is a new version, runs the upgrade, and they are done.
> However, in a few cases, we are running into an issue where for whatever
> reason, the CAD upgrade process (which is the process that happens after the
> software was installed via the .MSI), it loops over and over and never
> completes the upgrade. We have uninstalled the software, cleaned the temp
> files, cleaned the registry, reinstalled the .MSI file, and yet the upgrade
> still fails. It looks as if it is trying to download a 21Mb upgrade, but it
> literally takes only 1 second, which maybe it can?t find it for whatever
> reason. I?m a bit clueless as it worked find on the other 9 workstations we
> installed it on. Can anyone shed any light on what may be wrong or what I
> can try? Thanks, Matt CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT This communication and any
> attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be protected by one or more legal
> privileges. It is intended solely for the use of the addressee identified
> above. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure, copying
> or distribution of this communication is UNAUTHORIZED. Neither this
> information block, the typed name of the sender, nor anything else in this
> message is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific
> statement to the contrary is included in this message. If you have received
> this communication in error, please immediately contact me and delete this
> communication from your computer. Thank you. -------------- next part
> -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
> ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 09:29:29
> -0700 From: "Chris Ward (chrward)" To: "ROZA, Ariel" , Subject: Re:
> [cisco-voip] CCM Administration Audit? Message-ID: <
> 75D9B5F4E50C8B4BB27622BD06C2B82B08D50627 at xmb-sjc-235.amer.cisco.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" If you are looking for a
> tool, then someone else will have to comment. If you are willing to do some
> looking and learning on your own, you can see everything that is done in the
> CCMAdmin pages via the Tomcat Localhost logs which you can collect via RTMT.
> They are *almost* human readable and can show actions/events on pages and
> the user login that performed them. HTH -Chris From:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of ROZA, Ariel Sent:
> Tuesday, October 06, 2009 12:30 PM To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Subject:
> [cisco-voip] CCM Administration Audit? Hi! I was wondering what kind of
> method do you guys use when needed to audit the CCM Administration pages (to
> know when someone modified/addeed a phone or a gateway, for example) I have
> been requested this by several customers, and as far as my knowledge goes
> there is no straightforward Auditing setting in CCM. Regards, Ariel ARIEL
> ROZA Postsales Support Engineer LOGICALIS Paseo Col?n 707 - C.A.B.A. -
> Argentina - C1063ACH Tel/Fax: +54 (11) 4344-0400
> ariel.roza at la.logicalis.com www.la.logicalis.com www.logicalisnow.com Por
> favor, piense en el medioambiente antes de imprimir este email. La presente
> informaci?n se env?a ?nicamente para el destinatario, y contiene informaci?n
> de car?cter CONFIDENCIAL o PRIVLEGIADA. La modificaci?n, retransmisi?n,
> difus?n, copia u otro uso de esta informaci?n por cualquier medio, por
> personas distintas al destinatario, est?n estrictamente prohibidas.
> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009
> 12:35:05 -0400 From: Ryan Ratliff To: "ROZA, Ariel" Cc:
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCM Administration
> Audit? Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1";
> Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes" CUCM 7.1 has additional audit logs specifically
> for this purpose. Check the release notes for details. -Ryan On Oct 6, 2009,
> at 12:29 PM, ROZA, Ariel wrote: Hi! I was wondering what kind of method do
> you guys use when needed to audit the CCM Administration pages (to know when
> someone modified/ addeed a phone or a gateway, for example) I have been
> requested this by several customers, and as far as my knowledge goes there
> is no straightforward Auditing setting in CCM. Regards, Ariel ARIEL ROZA
> Postsales Support Engineer LOGICALIS Paseo Col?n 707 - C.A.B.A. - Argentina
> - C1063ACH Tel/Fax: +54 (11) 4344-0400 ariel.roza at la.logicalis.com
> www.la.logicalis.com www.logicalisnow.com Por favor, piense en el
> medioambiente antes de imprimir este email. La presente informaci?n se env?a
> ?nicamente para el destinatario, y contiene informaci?n de car?cter
> CONFIDENCIAL o PRIVLEGIADA. La modificaci?n, retransmisi?n, difus?n, copia u
> otro uso de esta informaci?n por cualquier medio, por personas distintas al
> destinatario, est?n estrictamente prohibidas.
> _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip -------------- next
> part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
> ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 09:37:19
> -0700 From: Cristobal Priego To: "Chris Ward (chrward)" Cc:
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCM Administration
> Audit? Message-ID: <
> 687869f00910060937q12cf2deep42a6919f2ad86b18 at mail.gmail.com> Content-Type:
> text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Clarius is a pretty awesome tool. its a
> third party application that works great and will let know know what was
> added, when or what was modified and when 2009/10/6 Chris Ward (chrward) >
> If you are looking for a tool, then someone else will have to comment. > > >
> > If you are willing to do some looking and learning on your own, you can
> see > everything that is done in the CCMAdmin pages via the Tomcat Localhost
> logs > which you can collect via RTMT. They are *almost* human readable and
> can > show actions/events on pages and the user login that performed them. >
> > > > HTH > > > > -Chris > > > > *From:*
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto: >
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *ROZA, Ariel > *Sent:*
> Tuesday, October 06, 2009 12:30 PM > *To:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net >
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] CCM Administration Audit? > > > > Hi! > > > > I was
> wondering what kind of method do you guys use when needed to audit > the CCM
> Administration pages (to know when someone modified/addeed a phone > or a
> gateway, for example) > > > > I have been requested this by several
> customers, and as far as my > knowledge goes there is no straightforward
> Auditing setting in CCM. > > > > Regards, > > > > Ariel > > > > > > > > > >
> *ARIEL ROZA* > *Postsales Support Engineer* > > > > *LOGICALIS* > Paseo
> Col?n 707 - C.A.B.A. - Argentina - C1063ACH > Tel/Fax: +54 (11) 4344-0400 >
> *ariel.roza at la.logicalis.com* > *www.la.logicalis.com >
> www.logicalisnow.com* > > > > Por favor, piense en el medioambiente antes
> de imprimir este email. > La presente informaci?n se env?a ?nicamente para
> el destinatario, y > contiene informaci?n de car?cter CONFIDENCIAL o
> PRIVLEGIADA. > La modificaci?n, retransmisi?n, difus?n, copia u otro uso de
> esta > informaci?n por cualquier medio, por personas distintas al
> destinatario, > est?n estrictamente prohibidas. > > > >
> _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list >
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net >
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > > --------------
> next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
> ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 11:56:51
> -0500 From: "Voice Noob" To: "'Matthew Loraditch'" , "'Lelio Fulgenzi'" Cc:
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] IOS Release 15 Is out
> Message-ID: <004801ca46a6$01cf78d0$056e6a70$@com> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="us-ascii" There is a new version of the ISR routers coming out next
> year. From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Matthew Loraditch Sent:
> Monday, October 05, 2009 8:28 PM To: Lelio Fulgenzi Cc:
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] IOS Release 15 Is out
> go to the download section for 15, 1900, 2900 and 3900 plus this http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/fundamentals/configuration/guide/cf_dgtl
> y_sgnd_sw.html<http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/fundamentals/configuration/guide/cf_dgtly_sgnd_sw.html>Matthew Loraditch 1965 Greenspring Drive Timonium, MD 21093
> support at heliontechnologies.com (p) (410) 252-8830 (F) (443) 541-1593 Visit
> us at www.heliontechnologies.com Support Issue? Email
> support at heliontechnologies.com for fast assistance! _____ From: Lelio
> Fulgenzi [lelio at uoguelph.ca] Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 9:18 PM To:
> Matthew Loraditch Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip]
> IOS Release 15 Is out where are you reading about new routers? am i missing
> something? --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of
> Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX
> (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ "Bad
> grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew
> Loraditch" To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Sent: Monday, October 5, 2009
> 8:41:38 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: [cisco-voip] IOS Release 15
> Is out
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/15_0/release/notes/150MNEWF.html Lots
> of reading there, some new features for CCME and such and new routers coming
> I'm sure 13 got canned for bad luck but happened to 14? Matthew Loraditch
> 1965 Greenspring Drive Timonium, MD 21093 support at heliontechnologies.com(p) (410) 252-8830 (F) (443) 541-1593 Visit us at
> www.heliontechnologies.com Support Issue? Email
> support at heliontechnologies.com for fast assistance!
> _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip -------------- next
> part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
> ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 11:48:14
> -0500 From: Scott Kee To: cisco-voip mailinglist Subject: [cisco-voip]
> adding subscriber in the CUCM cluster Message-ID: <
> 21712D91F95FB640822E2DFE19ADB7DB101C7D35 at CMSMAIL.Spectrumhealth.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" I am trying to setup a test
> CUCM cluster in my test lab. I've setup CUCM Publisher and Subscriber using
> VMware v2. I tweaked MAC Addresses so both Publisher and Subscriber has MAC
> address as production server. I installed License keys so CUCM has 2 server
> and devices licenses. So I think I am good as far as licenses concern. I
> installed Publisher and works fine however I installed Subscriber but it is
> not showing up in the CUCM Group. It only shows Publisher. I configured
> subscriber in the System->Server and System->Cisco Unified UM before I
> installed Subscriber. Do I need to change anything after the installation?
> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009
> 23:11:41 +0530 From: Subhrojyoti Banerjee To: Subject: [cisco-voip] HP
> Server Solutions page on Cisco 7800 MCS Message-ID: Content-Type:
> text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hi All, As you can see from below screen
> shot, the G6 is mentioned; and in the table that follows, we have specific
> mention of the G6 being able to be used to load CUCM.
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/voicesw/ps6790/ps5748/ps378/product_solution_overview09186a0080107d79.htmlBut on the reference page for CUCM, we see the AC691A model (5540 - 2.53GHz)
> referred to Whereas the box is checked for CCM 4.3(2) and CUCM 7.1(3). I
> don't know why we don't see a dual Nehalem HP box on this matrix yet, but
> neither do we see an dual Nehalem IBM box. Perhaps still being tested. Am I
> reading this correctly? Has anyone tried to install CUCM 7.1(3) on a DL380G6
> single E5540 (AC691A)? Thanks and regards, Subhrojyoti -------------- next
> part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: --------------
> next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name:
> Outlook.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 73008 bytes Desc: not available URL:
> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was
> scrubbed... Name: Outlook.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 100557 bytes Desc: not
> available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment
> was scrubbed... Name: Outlook.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 10530 bytes Desc:
> not available URL: ------------------------------ Message: 9 Date: Tue, 6
> Oct 2009 14:41:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Lelio Fulgenzi To: Subhrojyoti Banerjee
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] HP Server
> Solutions page on Cisco 7800 MCS Message-ID: <
> 1476485067.11635741254854483430.JavaMail.root at simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" I asked this a day or two
> ago...Wes confirmed that only the single 2.53Ghz CPU is required for
> CallManager as the "7845" equiv. --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst
> (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 (519) 824-4120 x56354
> (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ "Bad
> grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt ----- Original Message ----- From:
> "Subhrojyoti Banerjee" To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Sent: Tuesday,
> October 6, 2009 1:41:41 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject:
> [cisco-voip] HP Server Solutions page on Cisco 7800 MCS Hi All, As you can
> see from below screen shot, the G6 is mentioned; and in the table that
> follows, we have specific mention of the G6 being able to be used to load
> CUCM.
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/voicesw/ps6790/ps5748/ps378/product_solution_overview09186a0080107d79.htmlBut on the reference page for CUCM, we see the AC691A model (5540 - 2.53GHz)
> referred to Whereas the box is checked for CCM 4.3(2) and CUCM 7.1(3). I
> don't know why we don't see a dual Nehalem HP box on this matrix yet, but
> neither do we see an dual Nehalem IBM box. Perhaps still being tested. Am I
> reading this correctly? Has anyone tried to install CUCM 7.1(3) on a DL380G6
> single E5540 (AC691A)? Thanks and regards, Subhrojyoti
> _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip -------------- next
> part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
> ------------------------------ Message: 10 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 14:23:37
> -0500 From: Charles Goldsmith To: voip puck Subject: [cisco-voip] mobile
> connect configuration Message-ID: <
> 4be4573d0910061223laaaf531y4ea61f2407ca5c23 at mail.gmail.com> Content-Type:
> text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Mobile connect (Single Number Reach) on the
> CM (7.1.2) has me a bit baffled. When the call goes through to the cell, and
> is answered, no problems there, however, when you want to pick up the line
> on your desk, there is no button to do so. You have to hang up the cell
> phone, which puts the call on hold on your desk, or use the enterprise
> feature codes (for example, *81 to hold) and put the call on hold, then pick
> it up on the desk phone. Details on this configuration are found at
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_1_2/ccmfeat/fsmobmgr.htmlIs there no better way to handle this? The end user is going to hear on-hold
> music either way. On a CME, the desk phone gets a resume button because the
> call seems to be on-hold during SNR, and you can switch it from mobile to
> desk seamlessly with no clicks, blips, or on-hold music. Our CIO doesn't
> like our "upgrade" from CME to CM because of this feature, and the loss of
> visual voicemail (another issue outside the scope of this topic). Any help
> would be appreciated. Charles ------------------------------ Message: 11
> Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 12:48:35 -0700 From: "Chris Ward (chrward)" To:
> "Charles Goldsmith" , "voip puck" Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] mobile connect
> configuration Message-ID: <
> 75D9B5F4E50C8B4BB27622BD06C2B82B08D50726 at xmb-sjc-235.amer.cisco.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi Charles, You are correct in
> your understanding. One thing that *may* help is the following: On the user
> config page in CCMAdmin, under the mobility settings, there is a parameter
> called " Maximum Wait Time for Desk Pickup". Setting this to 0 will disable
> the automatic call hold when you hang up on your desk phone. So when you
> want to flat-out end a call, you can just hang up. Now, if you want to
> transfer the call to your desk phone, you can still use the *81 feature and
> can pick it up on the desk phone. Also, not sure why you can't get visual
> voicemail. My CUCM phone has it running, although I am not sure what the
> CUCM versions or apps are behind as I don't have visibility into that
> cluster. I will pass this feedback along as the CME method does seem a
> little nicer than the CUCM method, but really, you should provide this
> feedback to your account team. Good luck! -Chris -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Charles Goldsmith Sent:
> Tuesday, October 06, 2009 3:24 PM To: voip puck Subject: [cisco-voip] mobile
> connect configuration Mobile connect (Single Number Reach) on the CM (7.1.2)
> has me a bit baffled. When the call goes through to the cell, and is
> answered, no problems there, however, when you want to pick up the line on
> your desk, there is no button to do so. You have to hang up the cell phone,
> which puts the call on hold on your desk, or use the enterprise feature
> codes (for example, *81 to hold) and put the call on hold, then pick it up
> on the desk phone. Details on this configuration are found at http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_1_2/ccmfeat/f
> smobmgr.html<http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_1_2/ccmfeat/fsmobmgr.html>Is there no better way to handle this? The end user is going to hear on-hold
> music either way. On a CME, the desk phone gets a resume button because the
> call seems to be on-hold during SNR, and you can switch it from mobile to
> desk seamlessly with no clicks, blips, or on-hold music. Our CIO doesn't
> like our "upgrade" from CME to CM because of this feature, and the loss of
> visual voicemail (another issue outside the scope of this topic). Any help
> would be appreciated. Charles
> _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip------------------------------ Message: 12 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 14:58:11
> -0500 From: Charles Goldsmith To: "Chris Ward (chrward)" Cc: voip puck
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration Message-ID: <
> 4be4573d0910061258p200f2b19ue7ff58e221f6452c at mail.gmail.com> Content-Type:
> text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks Chris. I did play around with the
> Maximum wait time, but my users (and CIO) prefer the hangup method over
> using the code. About visual voicemail, from what I've read, it's not
> supported on the non-java phones, and all of my users have 7960G phones. The
> CME/CUE combo offered a nice, quick application for visual voicemail. The
> few people who have 7975G don't like the slowness of the java app (me being
> one of them). I will certainly give this feedback to my Cisco account
> manager. Thanks Charles On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Chris Ward (chrward)
> wrote: > Hi Charles, > > You are correct in your understanding. One thing
> that *may* help is the > following: > > On the user config page in CCMAdmin,
> under the mobility settings, there > is a parameter called " Maximum Wait
> Time for Desk Pickup". Setting this > to 0 will disable the automatic call
> hold when you hang up on your desk > phone. So when you want to flat-out end
> a call, you can just hang up. > Now, if you want to transfer the call to
> your desk phone, you can still > use the *81 feature and can pick it up on
> the desk phone. > > Also, not sure why you can't get visual voicemail. My
> CUCM phone has it > running, although I am not sure what the CUCM versions
> or apps are > behind as I don't have visibility into that cluster. > > I
> will pass this feedback along as the CME method does seem a little > nicer
> than the CUCM method, but really, you should provide this feedback > to your
> account team. Good luck! > > -Chris > > > -----Original Message----- > From:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net > [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Charles > Goldsmith >
> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 3:24 PM > To: voip puck > Subject:
> [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration > > Mobile connect (Single Number
> Reach) on the CM (7.1.2) has me a bit > baffled. ?When the call goes through
> to the cell, and is answered, no > problems there, however, when you want to
> pick up the line on your > desk, there is no button to do so. ?You have to
> hang up the cell > phone, which puts the call on hold on your desk, or use
> the enterprise > feature codes (for example, *81 to hold) and put the call
> on hold, > then pick it up on the desk phone. > > Details on this
> configuration are found at >
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_1_2/ccmfeat/f >
> smobmgr.html > > Is there no better way to handle this? ?The end user is
> going to hear > on-hold music either way. ? On a CME, the desk phone gets a
> resume > button because the call seems to be on-hold during SNR, and you can
> > switch it from mobile to desk seamlessly with no clicks, blips, or >
> on-hold music. > > Our CIO doesn't like our "upgrade" from CME to CM because
> of this > feature, and the loss of visual voicemail (another issue outside
> the > scope of this topic). > > Any help would be appreciated. > > Charles >
> _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list >
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net >
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip >
> ------------------------------ Message: 13 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:03:11
> -0700 From: "Chris Ward (chrward)" To: "Charles Goldsmith" Cc: voip puck
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration Message-ID: <
> 75D9B5F4E50C8B4BB27622BD06C2B82B08D5072D at xmb-sjc-235.amer.cisco.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Ah, I was missing the part
> about the 7960 (non-java). So yes, you are limited there. But you are going
> to be limited in basically all the new features also. I use a 7975 and don't
> experience any type of slowness (or don't think I do). Are there specific
> areas of phone usage you experience the slowness? I honestly haven't noticed
> any peppiness issues on the Java phone with the exception of pre-dialing,
> which was fixed when we introduced en-bloc dialing a little while ago. Let
> me know. Thanks Charles! -Chris -----Original Message----- From: Charles
> Goldsmith [mailto:wokka at justfamily.org] Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009
> 3:58 PM To: Chris Ward (chrward) Cc: voip puck Subject: Re: [cisco-voip]
> mobile connect configuration Thanks Chris. I did play around with the
> Maximum wait time, but my users (and CIO) prefer the hangup method over
> using the code. About visual voicemail, from what I've read, it's not
> supported on the non-java phones, and all of my users have 7960G phones. The
> CME/CUE combo offered a nice, quick application for visual voicemail. The
> few people who have 7975G don't like the slowness of the java app (me being
> one of them). I will certainly give this feedback to my Cisco account
> manager. Thanks Charles On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Chris Ward (chrward)
> wrote: > Hi Charles, > > You are correct in your understanding. One thing
> that *may* help is the > following: > > On the user config page in CCMAdmin,
> under the mobility settings, there > is a parameter called " Maximum Wait
> Time for Desk Pickup". Setting this > to 0 will disable the automatic call
> hold when you hang up on your desk > phone. So when you want to flat-out end
> a call, you can just hang up. > Now, if you want to transfer the call to
> your desk phone, you can still > use the *81 feature and can pick it up on
> the desk phone. > > Also, not sure why you can't get visual voicemail. My
> CUCM phone has it > running, although I am not sure what the CUCM versions
> or apps are > behind as I don't have visibility into that cluster. > > I
> will pass this feedback along as the CME method does seem a little > nicer
> than the CUCM method, but really, you should provide this feedback > to your
> account team. Good luck! > > -Chris > > > -----Original Message----- > From:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net > [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Charles > Goldsmith >
> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 3:24 PM > To: voip puck > Subject:
> [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration > > Mobile connect (Single Number
> Reach) on the CM (7.1.2) has me a bit > baffled. ?When the call goes through
> to the cell, and is answered, no > problems there, however, when you want to
> pick up the line on your > desk, there is no button to do so. ?You have to
> hang up the cell > phone, which puts the call on hold on your desk, or use
> the enterprise > feature codes (for example, *81 to hold) and put the call
> on hold, > then pick it up on the desk phone. > > Details on this
> configuration are found at >
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_1_2/ccmfeat/f >
> smobmgr.html > > Is there no better way to handle this? ?The end user is
> going to hear > on-hold music either way. ? On a CME, the desk phone gets a
> resume > button because the call seems to be on-hold during SNR, and you can
> > switch it from mobile to desk seamlessly with no clicks, blips, or >
> on-hold music. > > Our CIO doesn't like our "upgrade" from CME to CM because
> of this > feature, and the loss of visual voicemail (another issue outside
> the > scope of this topic). > > Any help would be appreciated. > > Charles >
> _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list >
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net >
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip >
> ------------------------------ Message: 14 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:12:14
> -0500 From: anand To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip]
> installing windows server 2008 standard on hp server Message-ID: <
> 2b1167120910061312h1417c040ifd30fa1abc5e8ed2 at mail.gmail.com> Content-Type:
> text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hi, I have an HP proliant 360 server.I am
> planning to install windows server 2008 on the server.I started with HP
> smartnet cd which aks me to upload the dvd image file .When i tried to open
> the file and choose continue it says *'a valid cd image 1 is required to
> continue*". I gave correct product key which i got from windows.I downloaded
> the image file from microsoft.Can someone help me to figure out the problem.
> thanks, anand. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment
> was scrubbed... URL: ------------------------------ Message: 15 Date: Tue, 6
> Oct 2009 13:25:32 -0700 From: "Chris Ward (chrward)" To: "Chris Ward
> (chrward)" , "Charles Goldsmith" Cc: voip puck Subject: Re: [cisco-voip]
> mobile connect configuration Message-ID: <
> 75D9B5F4E50C8B4BB27622BD06C2B82B08D50746 at xmb-sjc-235.amer.cisco.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Charles, Just learned of a
> feature called "Dusting" or "Call Move" which will be released in CUCM 8.0
> that will allow you to push a call to your desk phone from the cell phone
> without MOH being heard. So it's not perfect but better. -Chris
> -----Original Message----- From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net[mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Chris Ward (chrward)
> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 4:03 PM To: Charles Goldsmith Cc: voip puck
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration Ah, I was missing the
> part about the 7960 (non-java). So yes, you are limited there. But you are
> going to be limited in basically all the new features also. I use a 7975 and
> don't experience any type of slowness (or don't think I do). Are there
> specific areas of phone usage you experience the slowness? I honestly
> haven't noticed any peppiness issues on the Java phone with the exception of
> pre-dialing, which was fixed when we introduced en-bloc dialing a little
> while ago. Let me know. Thanks Charles! -Chris -----Original Message-----
> From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:wokka at justfamily.org] Sent: Tuesday,
> October 06, 2009 3:58 PM To: Chris Ward (chrward) Cc: voip puck Subject: Re:
> [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration Thanks Chris. I did play around
> with the Maximum wait time, but my users (and CIO) prefer the hangup method
> over using the code. About visual voicemail, from what I've read, it's not
> supported on the non-java phones, and all of my users have 7960G phones. The
> CME/CUE combo offered a nice, quick application for visual voicemail. The
> few people who have 7975G don't like the slowness of the java app (me being
> one of them). I will certainly give this feedback to my Cisco account
> manager. Thanks Charles On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Chris Ward (chrward)
> wrote: > Hi Charles, > > You are correct in your understanding. One thing
> that *may* help is the > following: > > On the user config page in CCMAdmin,
> under the mobility settings, there > is a parameter called " Maximum Wait
> Time for Desk Pickup". Setting this > to 0 will disable the automatic call
> hold when you hang up on your desk > phone. So when you want to flat-out end
> a call, you can just hang up. > Now, if you want to transfer the call to
> your desk phone, you can still > use the *81 feature and can pick it up on
> the desk phone. > > Also, not sure why you can't get visual voicemail. My
> CUCM phone has it > running, although I am not sure what the CUCM versions
> or apps are > behind as I don't have visibility into that cluster. > > I
> will pass this feedback along as the CME method does seem a little > nicer
> than the CUCM method, but really, you should provide this feedback > to your
> account team. Good luck! > > -Chris > > > -----Original Message----- > From:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net > [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Charles > Goldsmith >
> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 3:24 PM > To: voip puck > Subject:
> [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration > > Mobile connect (Single Number
> Reach) on the CM (7.1.2) has me a bit > baffled. ?When the call goes through
> to the cell, and is answered, no > problems there, however, when you want to
> pick up the line on your > desk, there is no button to do so. ?You have to
> hang up the cell > phone, which puts the call on hold on your desk, or use
> the enterprise > feature codes (for example, *81 to hold) and put the call
> on hold, > then pick it up on the desk phone. > > Details on this
> configuration are found at >
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_1_2/ccmfeat/f >
> smobmgr.html > > Is there no better way to handle this? ?The end user is
> going to hear > on-hold music either way. ? On a CME, the desk phone gets a
> resume > button because the call seems to be on-hold during SNR, and you can
> > switch it from mobile to desk seamlessly with no clicks, blips, or >
> on-hold music. > > Our CIO doesn't like our "upgrade" from CME to CM because
> of this > feature, and the loss of visual voicemail (another issue outside
> the > scope of this topic). > > Any help would be appreciated. > > Charles >
> _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list >
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net >
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip >
> _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip------------------------------ Message: 16 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:27:28
> -0500 From: Robert Knapp To: anand , "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" Subject:
> Re: [cisco-voip] installing windows server 2008 standard on hp server
> Message-ID: <
> 0265D29403E7EE46B37A63FEE0026A2F0415A547C2 at SPLKEXCH07.spanlink.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" I had a similar issue with
> win2k3r2. The disk was bad. If it's a HP, smart start is already
> installed... Change the array to best practice Install windows, add smart
> start drivers Thanks, Robert Knapp From:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of anand Sent: Tuesday,
> October 06, 2009 4:12 PM To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Subject: Re:
> [cisco-voip] installing windows server 2008 standard on hp server Hi, I have
> an HP proliant 360 server.I am planning to install windows server 2008 on
> the server.I started with HP smartnet cd which aks me to upload the dvd
> image file .When i tried to open the file and choose continue it says 'a
> valid cd image 1 is required to continue". I gave correct product key which
> i got from windows.I downloaded the image file from microsoft.Can someone
> help me to figure out the problem. thanks, anand. -------------- next part
> -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
> ------------------------------ Message: 17 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:37:01
> -0500 From: Charles Goldsmith To: "Chris Ward (chrward)" Cc: voip puck
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration Message-ID: <
> 4be4573d0910061337g4cb024c6g8efea0945a47f5ab at mail.gmail.com> Content-Type:
> text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 It's a good first start, and as long as its a
> seamless move (ie, like the CME), it should suffice. About the slowness of
> the java, I was specificially referring to the visual voicemail. On my 7975,
> when I hit the services button, select the visual voicemail app and hit
> select, it will take 4 to 5 seconds to load the app. On a 7960 on the CME,
> hitting Service, then Selecting the visual voicemail is quick, less than
> half a second. I understand features on the newer phones, but there are
> faster ways to program than always using Java, and Cisco is bad about using
> it too much. I'm not trying to start a flame war about what is the best
> language, and I understand why they use Java for the portability, but its
> notorious for slowness. Charles On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Chris Ward
> (chrward) wrote: > Charles, > > Just learned of a feature called "Dusting"
> or "Call Move" which will be released in CUCM 8.0 that will allow you to
> push a call to your desk phone from the cell phone without MOH being heard.
> So it's not perfect but better. > > -Chris > > > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Chris Ward (chrward) >
> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 4:03 PM > To: Charles Goldsmith > Cc: voip
> puck > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration > > Ah, I was
> missing the part about the 7960 (non-java). > > So yes, you are limited
> there. But you are going to be limited in basically all the new features
> also. > > I use a 7975 and don't experience any type of slowness (or don't
> think I do). Are there specific areas of phone usage you experience the
> slowness? I honestly haven't noticed any peppiness issues on the Java phone
> with the exception of pre-dialing, which was fixed when we introduced
> en-bloc dialing a little while ago. > > Let me know. Thanks Charles! > >
> -Chris > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:
> wokka at justfamily.org] > Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 3:58 PM > To:
> Chris Ward (chrward) > Cc: voip puck > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] mobile
> connect configuration > > Thanks Chris. ? I did play around with the Maximum
> wait time, but my > users (and CIO) prefer the hangup method over using the
> code. > > About visual voicemail, from what I've read, it's not supported on
> the > non-java phones, and all of my users have 7960G phones. ?The CME/CUE >
> combo offered a nice, quick application for visual voicemail. ?The few >
> people who have 7975G don't like the slowness of the java app (me > being
> one of them). > > I will certainly give this feedback to my Cisco account
> manager. > > Thanks > Charles > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Chris Ward
> (chrward) wrote: >> Hi Charles, >> >> You are correct in your understanding.
> One thing that *may* help is the >> following: >> >> On the user config page
> in CCMAdmin, under the mobility settings, there >> is a parameter called "
> Maximum Wait Time for Desk Pickup". Setting this >> to 0 will disable the
> automatic call hold when you hang up on your desk >> phone. So when you want
> to flat-out end a call, you can just hang up. >> Now, if you want to
> transfer the call to your desk phone, you can still >> use the *81 feature
> and can pick it up on the desk phone. >> >> Also, not sure why you can't get
> visual voicemail. My CUCM phone has it >> running, although I am not sure
> what the CUCM versions or apps are >> behind as I don't have visibility into
> that cluster. >> >> I will pass this feedback along as the CME method does
> seem a little >> nicer than the CUCM method, but really, you should provide
> this feedback >> to your account team. Good luck! >> >> -Chris >> >> >>
> -----Original Message----- >> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net >>
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Charles >>
> Goldsmith >> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 3:24 PM >> To: voip puck >>
> Subject: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration >> >> Mobile connect
> (Single Number Reach) on the CM (7.1.2) has me a bit >> baffled. ?When the
> call goes through to the cell, and is answered, no >> problems there,
> however, when you want to pick up the line on your >> desk, there is no
> button to do so. ?You have to hang up the cell >> phone, which puts the call
> on hold on your desk, or use the enterprise >> feature codes (for example,
> *81 to hold) and put the call on hold, >> then pick it up on the desk phone.
> >> >> Details on this configuration are found at >>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_1_2/ccmfeat/f>> smobmgr.html >> >> Is there no better way to handle this? ?The end user
> is going to hear >> on-hold music either way. ? On a CME, the desk phone
> gets a resume >> button because the call seems to be on-hold during SNR, and
> you can >> switch it from mobile to desk seamlessly with no clicks, blips,
> or >> on-hold music. >> >> Our CIO doesn't like our "upgrade" from CME to CM
> because of this >> feature, and the loss of visual voicemail (another issue
> outside the >> scope of this topic). >> >> Any help would be appreciated. >>
> >> Charles >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-voip
> mailing list >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net >>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip >> >
> _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list >
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net >
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip >
> ------------------------------ Message: 18 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:02:24
> -0500 From: "Voice Noob" To: "'Charles Goldsmith'" , "'Chris Ward
> \(chrward\)'" Cc: 'voip puck' Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] mobile connect
> configuration Message-ID: <000001ca46c8$5065c1d0$f1314570$@com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" I agree on the slowness of
> the JAVA visual voicemail. -----Original Message----- From:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Charles Goldsmith Sent:
> Tuesday, October 06, 2009 3:37 PM To: Chris Ward (chrward) Cc: voip puck
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration It's a good first
> start, and as long as its a seamless move (ie, like the CME), it should
> suffice. About the slowness of the java, I was specificially referring to
> the visual voicemail. On my 7975, when I hit the services button, select the
> visual voicemail app and hit select, it will take 4 to 5 seconds to load the
> app. On a 7960 on the CME, hitting Service, then Selecting the visual
> voicemail is quick, less than half a second. I understand features on the
> newer phones, but there are faster ways to program than always using Java,
> and Cisco is bad about using it too much. I'm not trying to start a flame
> war about what is the best language, and I understand why they use Java for
> the portability, but its notorious for slowness. Charles On Tue, Oct 6, 2009
> at 3:25 PM, Chris Ward (chrward) wrote: > Charles, > > Just learned of a
> feature called "Dusting" or "Call Move" which will be released in CUCM 8.0
> that will allow you to push a call to your desk phone from the cell phone
> without MOH being heard. So it's not perfect but better. > > -Chris > > >
> -----Original Message----- > From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net[mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Chris Ward (chrward) >
> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 4:03 PM > To: Charles Goldsmith > Cc: voip
> puck > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration > > Ah, I was
> missing the part about the 7960 (non-java). > > So yes, you are limited
> there. But you are going to be limited in basically all the new features
> also. > > I use a 7975 and don't experience any type of slowness (or don't
> think I do). Are there specific areas of phone usage you experience the
> slowness? I honestly haven't noticed any peppiness issues on the Java phone
> with the exception of pre-dialing, which was fixed when we introduced
> en-bloc dialing a little while ago. > > Let me know. Thanks Charles! > >
> -Chris > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:
> wokka at justfamily.org] > Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 3:58 PM > To:
> Chris Ward (chrward) > Cc: voip puck > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] mobile
> connect configuration > > Thanks Chris. ? I did play around with the Maximum
> wait time, but my > users (and CIO) prefer the hangup method over using the
> code. > > About visual voicemail, from what I've read, it's not supported on
> the > non-java phones, and all of my users have 7960G phones. ?The CME/CUE >
> combo offered a nice, quick application for visual voicemail. ?The few >
> people who have 7975G don't like the slowness of the java app (me > being
> one of them). > > I will certainly give this feedback to my Cisco account
> manager. > > Thanks > Charles > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Chris Ward
> (chrward) wrote: >> Hi Charles, >> >> You are correct in your understanding.
> One thing that *may* help is the >> following: >> >> On the user config page
> in CCMAdmin, under the mobility settings, there >> is a parameter called "
> Maximum Wait Time for Desk Pickup". Setting this >> to 0 will disable the
> automatic call hold when you hang up on your desk >> phone. So when you want
> to flat-out end a call, you can just hang up. >> Now, if you want to
> transfer the call to your desk phone, you can still >> use the *81 feature
> and can pick it up on the desk phone. >> >> Also, not sure why you can't get
> visual voicemail. My CUCM phone has it >> running, although I am not sure
> what the CUCM versions or apps are >> behind as I don't have visibility into
> that cluster. >> >> I will pass this feedback along as the CME method does
> seem a little >> nicer than the CUCM method, but really, you should provide
> this feedback >> to your account team. Good luck! >> >> -Chris >> >> >>
> -----Original Message----- >> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net >>
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Charles >>
> Goldsmith >> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 3:24 PM >> To: voip puck >>
> Subject: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration >> >> Mobile connect
> (Single Number Reach) on the CM (7.1.2) has me a bit >> baffled. ?When the
> call goes through to the cell, and is answered, no >> problems there,
> however, when you want to pick up the line on your >> desk, there is no
> button to do so. ?You have to hang up the cell >> phone, which puts the call
> on hold on your desk, or use the enterprise >> feature codes (for example,
> *81 to hold) and put the call on hold, >> then pick it up on the desk phone.
> >> >> Details on this configuration are found at >>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_1_2/ccmfeat/f>> smobmgr.html >> >> Is there no better way to handle this? ?The end user
> is going to hear >> on-hold music either way. ? On a CME, the desk phone
> gets a resume >> button because the call seems to be on-hold during SNR, and
> you can >> switch it from mobile to desk seamlessly with no clicks, blips,
> or >> on-hold music. >> >> Our CIO doesn't like our "upgrade" from CME to CM
> because of this >> feature, and the loss of visual voicemail (another issue
> outside the >> scope of this topic). >> >> Any help would be appreciated. >>
> >> Charles >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-voip
> mailing list >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net >>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip >> >
> _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list >
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net >
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip >
> _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip------------------------------ Message: 19 Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 02:43:21
> +0530 From: Subhrojyoti Banerjee To: , Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.netSubject: Re: [cisco-voip] another question for the cisco folk Message-ID:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Hi Wes, I posted the same
> question today, but had another related query. Although it's pretty
> interesting fact, but it's a bit in contradiction to what has been said
> about this before. This concept comes up in the UCCE 7.5 BOM, where it says-
> *********(Pg 12)*********************** Central Processing Unit Each
> individual core in a multi-core processor does not count as a processor
> towards server requirements given in Appendix A ? Server Classes. A
> processor is considered a single physical CPU, regardless of the number of
> cores. *************************************** But if a single E5540
> processor quad core Nehalem processor can function as a "7845" equivalent -
> with the number of supported phones in line with the 7845 figures (of course
> with 4+GB and 4 x 140GB drives), then that's a competitive piece of
> hardware. What do you think? Thanks, Subhrojyoti Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009
> 17:58:03 -0400 From: lelio at uoguelph.ca To: wsisk at cisco.com CC:
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] another question for
> the cisco folk that's kinda cool. save the cost of a CPU. should make the
> total cost a bit cheaper. i guess UCCE, Connection, etc, require the
> additional quad core CPU to sustain the higher device loads. thanks for
> chiming in. ;) --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of
> Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX
> (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ "Bad
> grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wes
> Sisk" To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" Cc: "cisco-voip voyp list" Sent: Monday, October
> 5, 2009 5:52:33 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Re: [cisco-voip]
> another question for the cisco folk Confirmed, it is a single quad core
> instead of 2 dual cores. Intentional and by design. /Wes On Monday, October
> 05, 2009 5:32:03 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote: hoping the cisco folk can chime
> in here...the latest swonly specs for the HP servers show that the 7845
> equivalent (not really, but the one that serves 7500 units) is only one CPU,
> unlike the high availability servers for connection which has two CPUs. was
> there an error in the docs or is the 7500 device server really only one CPU?
> i'm hoping some internal training reflects the correct stats. --- Lelio
> Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario
> N1G 2W1 (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ "Bad
> grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
> _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip -------------- next
> part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
> ------------------------------ Message: 20 Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:40:49
> -0500 From: Robert Singleton To: voip puck Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] mobile
> connect configuration Message-ID: <4ACBAB51.60909 at morsco.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed On 10/06/2009
> 03:37 PM, Charles Goldsmith wrote: > I'm not trying to start a flame war
> about what is the best language, > and I understand why they use Java for
> the portability, but its > notorious for slowness. Anything interpretted on
> the fly is going to be slow, or at least slowish.... :/ Robert
> ------------------------------ Message: 21 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 14:33:27
> -0700 From: "Chris Ward (chrward)" To: "Voice Noob" , "Charles Goldsmith"
> Cc: voip puck Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration
> Message-ID: <
> 75D9B5F4E50C8B4BB27622BD06C2B82B08D50789 at xmb-sjc-235.amer.cisco.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Roger. I too, do not want to
> start a war over this. However, on my 7975, with visual voicemail enabled, I
> am not experiencing this same delay. Now, my Visual Voicemail is not
> activated via "Services" menu, I just have to select the voicemail button
> and it allows me to choose regular voicemail or Visual Voicemail. As soon as
> I select Visual Voicemail, I see a "starting Application" message for ~1
> second, then it offers a login prompt. Signing in takes ~2-3 seconds, but
> again, no long pauses. It is possible that there are some time-outs or other
> stuff going on in your environment. The non-java and java phones would have
> different time-outs and different behaviors based on certain variables.
> Might be worth a packet capture. Also, it seems the version of Visual
> Voicemail I am using is not applicable for 7960s so perhaps it's a new
> version that may offer some speed enhancements you might be interested in. I
> think this is what we are using here:
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cupa/visual_voicemail/7.1/english/release/vivoReleaseNote71.htmlIt also had an interesting note regarding SIP:
> ---------------------------------------------- Visual Voicemail and 7941G,
> 7941G-GE, 7961G, 7961G-GE, 7970G, 7971G-GE Phones with SIP Visual Voicemail
> requires significant resources to perform efficiently. The SIP signaling
> protocol also requires more resources than the SCCP protocol. If your phones
> already require significant resources, for example, if the phones run other
> applications, contain key expansion modules, and a localization, Visual
> Voicemail might not perform reliably. This is particularly true when SIP is
> used on the following Cisco Unified IP Phones: *7941G *7941G-GE *7961G
> *7961G-GE *7970G *7971G-GE" ----------------------------------------------
> HTH -Chris -----Original Message----- From: Voice Noob [mailto:
> voicenoob at gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 5:02 PM To: 'Charles
> Goldsmith'; Chris Ward (chrward) Cc: 'voip puck' Subject: RE: [cisco-voip]
> mobile connect configuration I agree on the slowness of the JAVA visual
> voicemail. -----Original Message----- From:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Charles Goldsmith Sent:
> Tuesday, October 06, 2009 3:37 PM To: Chris Ward (chrward) Cc: voip puck
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration It's a good first
> start, and as long as its a seamless move (ie, like the CME), it should
> suffice. About the slowness of the java, I was specificially referring to
> the visual voicemail. On my 7975, when I hit the services button, select the
> visual voicemail app and hit select, it will take 4 to 5 seconds to load the
> app. On a 7960 on the CME, hitting Service, then Selecting the visual
> voicemail is quick, less than half a second. I understand features on the
> newer phones, but there are faster ways to program than always using Java,
> and Cisco is bad about using it too much. I'm not trying to start a flame
> war about what is the best language, and I understand why they use Java for
> the portability, but its notorious for slowness. Charles On Tue, Oct 6, 2009
> at 3:25 PM, Chris Ward (chrward) wrote: > Charles, > > Just learned of a
> feature called "Dusting" or "Call Move" which will be released in CUCM 8.0
> that will allow you to push a call to your desk phone from the cell phone
> without MOH being heard. So it's not perfect but better. > > -Chris > > >
> -----Original Message----- > From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net[mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Chris Ward (chrward) >
> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 4:03 PM > To: Charles Goldsmith > Cc: voip
> puck > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration > > Ah, I was
> missing the part about the 7960 (non-java). > > So yes, you are limited
> there. But you are going to be limited in basically all the new features
> also. > > I use a 7975 and don't experience any type of slowness (or don't
> think I do). Are there specific areas of phone usage you experience the
> slowness? I honestly haven't noticed any peppiness issues on the Java phone
> with the exception of pre-dialing, which was fixed when we introduced
> en-bloc dialing a little while ago. > > Let me know. Thanks Charles! > >
> -Chris > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:
> wokka at justfamily.org] > Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 3:58 PM > To:
> Chris Ward (chrward) > Cc: voip puck > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] mobile
> connect configuration > > Thanks Chris. ? I did play around with the Maximum
> wait time, but my > users (and CIO) prefer the hangup method over using the
> code. > > About visual voicemail, from what I've read, it's not supported on
> the > non-java phones, and all of my users have 7960G phones. ?The CME/CUE >
> combo offered a nice, quick application for visual voicemail. ?The few >
> people who have 7975G don't like the slowness of the java app (me > being
> one of them). > > I will certainly give this feedback to my Cisco account
> manager. > > Thanks > Charles > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Chris Ward
> (chrward) wrote: >> Hi Charles, >> >> You are correct in your understanding.
> One thing that *may* help is the >> following: >> >> On the user config page
> in CCMAdmin, under the mobility settings, there >> is a parameter called "
> Maximum Wait Time for Desk Pickup". Setting this >> to 0 will disable the
> automatic call hold when you hang up on your desk >> phone. So when you want
> to flat-out end a call, you can just hang up. >> Now, if you want to
> transfer the call to your desk phone, you can still >> use the *81 feature
> and can pick it up on the desk phone. >> >> Also, not sure why you can't get
> visual voicemail. My CUCM phone has it >> running, although I am not sure
> what the CUCM versions or apps are >> behind as I don't have visibility into
> that cluster. >> >> I will pass this feedback along as the CME method does
> seem a little >> nicer than the CUCM method, but really, you should provide
> this feedback >> to your account team. Good luck! >> >> -Chris >> >> >>
> -----Original Message----- >> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net >>
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Charles >>
> Goldsmith >> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 3:24 PM >> To: voip puck >>
> Subject: [cisco-voip] mobile connect configuration >> >> Mobile connect
> (Single Number Reach) on the CM (7.1.2) has me a bit >> baffled. ?When the
> call goes through to the cell, and is answered, no >> problems there,
> however, when you want to pick up the line on your >> desk, there is no
> button to do so. ?You have to hang up the cell >> phone, which puts the call
> on hold on your desk, or use the enterprise >> feature codes (for example,
> *81 to hold) and put the call on hold, >> then pick it up on the desk phone.
> >> >> Details on this configuration are found at >>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_1_2/ccmfeat/f>> smobmgr.html >> >> Is there no better way to handle this? ?The end user
> is going to hear >> on-hold music either way. ? On a CME, the desk phone
> gets a resume >> button because the call seems to be on-hold during SNR, and
> you can >> switch it from mobile to desk seamlessly with no clicks, blips,
> or >> on-hold music. >> >> Our CIO doesn't like our "upgrade" from CME to CM
> because of this >> feature, and the loss of visual voicemail (another issue
> outside the >> scope of this topic). >> >> Any help would be appreciated. >>
> >> Charles >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-voip
> mailing list >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net >>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip >> >
> _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list >
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net >
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip >
> _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip------------------------------ Message: 22 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:50:36
> -0500 From: anand To: Robert Knapp Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net"
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] installing windows server 2008 standard on hp
> server Message-ID: <
> 2b1167120910061450w5cb73fc5gcfadeb2feae59843 at mail.gmail.com> Content-Type:
> text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Hi, Thanks for the reply. Can i directly
> boot the dvd from the drive as you are mentioning that smart start is
> already installed.Does it affect in anyway if i directly boot the image
> rather than using step by step process of hp smart start. thanks, anand. On
> Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Robert Knapp wrote: > I had a similar issue
> with win2k3r2. The disk was bad. > > If it?s a HP, smart start is already
> installed? > > > > Change the array to best practice > > Install windows,
> add smart start drivers > > > > Thanks, > > > > Robert Knapp > > > > > >
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto: >
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *anand > *Sent:*
> Tuesday, October 06, 2009 4:12 PM > *To:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net >
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] installing windows server 2008 standard on hp >
> server > > > > Hi, > > > > I have an HP proliant 360 server.I am planning to
> install windows server > 2008 on the server.I started with HP smartnet cd
> which aks me to upload the > dvd image file .When i tried to open the file
> and choose continue it says > *'a valid cd image 1 is required to
> continue*". > > > > I gave correct product key which i got from windows.I
> downloaded the image > file from microsoft.Can someone help me to figure out
> the problem. > > > > thanks, > > anand. > > > -------------- next part
> -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
> ------------------------------ Message: 23 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 19:09:12
> -0400 From: "Jason Aarons (US)" To: Subject: [cisco-voip] 7962 Registration
> Issues with 7.1.2.32014-1 ? Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="us-ascii" We are building new out of box 7962's come from factory
> running 8.3(2) and are having registration issues with your 7962/7915s. Our
> production CallManager is running 7.1.2.32014-1 and the Device Defaults for
> 7962 are SCCP42.8-5-2SR1S When the 7962's initially boot and go out to load
> the firmware, it will immeidately get an "auth fail". We are using SCCP
> Non-Secure Mode. In some instances, the phone will fail to load the firmware
> but will still register however not many of the functions will work. I've
> seen one instance where the phone actually came up with the right
> configuration yet, in Call manager it didn't even show registered. The
> status was "unknown". What we did earlier this morning was pointed a test
> 7962 to another 7.1(2) cluster and let the phone auto-register and pull the
> correct load. Once the phone came back up and auto-registered to the other
> cluster then we just reset the phone dhcp settings to enabled so that the
> phones would re-register back to the first cluster. Once we did this then
> the phones would be able to register fine to the original cluster. Under the
> phone configuration in the device information box, the "Active Load ID" will
> be unknown. When you see this you will either have problems with the 7962
> coming up properly issues with the Sidecar if you have a sidecar.
> ----------------------------------------- Disclaimer: This e-mail
> communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged
> information and is for use by the designated addressee(s) named above only.
> If you are not the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have
> received this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
> this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If
> you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
> by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.
> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was
> scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/gif Size: 4673 bytes Desc:
> CompuServe GIF graphic URL: ------------------------------ Message: 24 Date:
> Tue, 6 Oct 2009 19:19:19 -0400 From: "Jason Aarons (US)" To: Subject:
> [cisco-voip] Nortel Translator Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="us-ascii" Does Cisco internally have a way or secret tool to export
> the data from a Nortel Option 81 so it can be imported into CallManager ?
> I've got a site with 2600 Nortel handsets, looking for some secret sauce
> that has been hidden in the closet in RTP.
> ----------------------------------------- Disclaimer: This e-mail
> communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged
> information and is for use by the designated addressee(s) named above only.
> If you are not the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have
> received this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
> this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If
> you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
> by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.
> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: ------------------------------ Message: 25 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009
> 19:34:33 -0400 From: "Jason Aarons (US)" To: "Jason Aarons (US)" Cc:
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] Resolved: 7962
> Registration Issues with 7.1.2.32014-1 ? Message-ID: Content-Type:
> text/plain; charset="us-ascii" 8.3(2) can not be upgraded to 8-5-2SR1S .
> they can however be upgraded to 8-5-2S. Upgrade them first to 8-5-2S and
> then 8-5-2SR1S. Reference for 8.5(2) http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cuipph/firmware/8_5_2/engl
> ish/release/notes/7900_852SR1.html<http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cuipph/firmware/8_5_2/english/release/notes/7900_852SR1.html>For all SCCP firmware upgrades from firmware release versions earlier than
> 8.3(3) to version 8.5(2)SR1 or greater, you must first upgrade your firmware
> to version 8.5(2). Once you have upgraded to version 8.5(2), you can upgrade
> your IP Phone to version 8.5(2)SR1 or later. Reference for 8.5(3) (future) http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cuipph/firmware/8_5_3/engl
> ish/release/notes/7900_853.html<http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cuipph/firmware/8_5_3/english/release/notes/7900_853.html>For all SCCP firmware upgrades from firmware release versions earlier than
> 8.3(3) to version 8.5(3) or greater, you must first upgrade your firmware to
> version 8.5(2). Once you have upgraded to version 8.5(2), you can upgrade
> your IP Phone to version 8.5(3) or later From:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons (US) Sent:
> Tuesday, October 06, 2009 7:09 PM To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Subject:
> [cisco-voip] 7962 Registration Issues with 7.1.2.32014-1 ? Importance: High
> We are building new out of box 7962's come from factory running 8.3(2) and
> are having registration issues with your 7962/7915s. Our production
> CallManager is running 7.1.2.32014-1 and the Device Defaults for 7962 are
> SCCP42.8-5-2SR1S When the 7962's initially boot and go out to load the
> firmware, it will immeidately get an "auth fail". We are using SCCP
> Non-Secure Mode. In some instances, the phone will fail to load the firmware
> but will still register however not many of the functions will work. I've
> seen one instance where the phone actually came up with the right
> configuration yet, in Call manager it didn't even show registered. The
> status was "unknown". What we did earlier this morning was pointed a test
> 7962 to another 7.1(2) cluster and let the phone auto-register and pull the
> correct load. Once the phone came back up and auto-registered to the other
> cluster then we just reset the phone dhcp settings to enabled so that the
> phones would re-register back to the first cluster. Once we did this then
> the phones would be able to register fine to the original cluster. Under the
> phone configuration in the device information box, the "Active Load ID" will
> be unknown. When you see this you will either have problems with the 7962
> coming up properly issues with the Sidecar if you have a sidecar.
> ________________________________ Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and
> any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information and is
> for use by the designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
> intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received this
> communication in error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its
> contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received
> this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to
> this message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.
> ----------------------------------------- Disclaimer: This e-mail
> communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged
> information and is for use by the designated addressee(s) named above only.
> If you are not the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have
> received this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
> this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If
> you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
> by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.
> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: ------------------------------ Message: 26 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009
> 19:43:44 -0500 From: "Philip Walenta" To: "'Jason Aarons \(US\)'" , Subject:
> Re: [cisco-voip] Nortel Translator Message-ID:
> <004501ca46e7$395e1fe0$ac1a5fa0$@rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="us-ascii" I want to say Clarus Systems has a tool that does this. I
> know someone had a tool that did this if not them. From:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons (US) Sent:
> Tuesday, October 06, 2009 6:19 PM To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Subject:
> [cisco-voip] Nortel Translator Does Cisco internally have a way or secret
> tool to export the data from a Nortel Option 81 so it can be imported into
> CallManager ? I've got a site with 2600 Nortel handsets, looking for some
> secret sauce that has been hidden in the closet in RTP. _____ Disclaimer:
> This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and
> privileged information and is for use by the designated addressee(s) named
> above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you are hereby notified
> that you have received this communication in error and that any use or
> reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
> unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us
> immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer.
> Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was
> scrubbed... URL: ------------------------------ Message: 27 Date: Tue, 6 Oct
> 2009 21:02:35 -0400 From: "Matt Slaga (US)" To: Philip Walenta , "Jason
> Aarons (US)" , "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" Subject: Re: [cisco-voip]
> Nortel Translator Message-ID:
> <5FE225375F6E3F4493474B90BC1B94EFB953F39FFE at USISPCLEXDB01.na.didata.local>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Unimax and a few others. Not
> inexpensive though. From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Philip Walenta Sent:
> Tuesday, October 06, 2009 8:44 PM To: Jason Aarons (US);
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Nortel Translator I
> want to say Clarus Systems has a tool that does this. I know someone had a
> tool that did this if not them. From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net[mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons (US) Sent:
> Tuesday, October 06, 2009 6:19 PM To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Subject:
> [cisco-voip] Nortel Translator Does Cisco internally have a way or secret
> tool to export the data from a Nortel Option 81 so it can be imported into
> CallManager ? I've got a site with 2600 Nortel handsets, looking for some
> secret sauce that has been hidden in the closet in RTP.
> ________________________________ Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and
> any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information and is
> for use by the designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
> intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received this
> communication in error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its
> contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received
> this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to
> this message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.
> ----------------------------------------- Disclaimer: This e-mail
> communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged
> information and is for use by the designated addressee(s) named above only.
> If you are not the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have
> received this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
> this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If
> you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
> by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.
> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: ------------------------------ Message: 28 Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009
> 21:35:50 -0400 From: Adam Frankel To: Scott Kee Cc: cisco-voip mailinglist
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] adding subscriber in the CUCM cluster Message-ID:
> <4ACBF076.8060202 at cisco.com> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset=windows-1252; format=flowed You could try activating the "Cisco
> CallManager" service on the Subscriber. Adam -------- Original Message
> -------- Subject: [cisco-voip] adding subscriber in the CUCM cluster From:
> Scott Kee To: cisco-voip mailinglist Date: 10/6/09 12:48 PM I am trying to
> setup a test CUCM cluster in my test lab. I?ve setup CUCM Publisher and
> Subscriber using VMware v2. I tweaked MAC Addresses so both Publisher and
> Subscriber has MAC address as production server. I installed License keys so
> CUCM has 2 server and devices licenses. So I think I am good as far as
> licenses concern. I installed Publisher and works fine however I installed
> Subscriber but it is not showing up in the CUCM Group. It only shows
> Publisher. I configured subscriber in the System->Server and System->Cisco
> Unified UM before I installed Subscriber. Do I need to change anything after
> the installation?
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip------------------------------ Message: 29 Date: 7 Oct 2009 00:53:00 +0000
> From: "Carter, Bill" To: Subject: [cisco-voip] OT Hypothetical USB question
> Message-ID: <0ab801ca46f1$fc5e3179$610010ac at sentinel.com> Content-Type:
> text/plain; charset="Utf-8" Lets say a fictitous company, lets call them Bay
> Networks, produced a new networking device with a mini-usb console port, how
> long of a USB-to-miniUSB cable could I buy of the shelf?
> ------------------------------ Message: 30 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 22:14:47
> -0400 From: "Jason Aarons (US)" To: "Carter, Bill" , Subject: Re:
> [cisco-voip] OT Hypothetical USB question Message-ID: Content-Type:
> text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Serial_Bus#Maximum_useful_distanc e
> -----Original Message----- From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net[mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Carter, Bill Sent:
> Tuesday, October 06, 2009 8:53 PM To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Subject:
> [cisco-voip] OT Hypothetical USB question Lets say a fictitous company, lets
> call them Bay Networks, produced a new networking device with a mini-usb
> console port, how long of a USB-to-miniUSB cable could I buy of the shelf?
> _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip----------------------------------------- Disclaimer: This e-mail
> communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged
> information and is for use by the designated addressee(s) named above only.
> If you are not the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have
> received this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
> this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If
> you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
> by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.
> ------------------------------ Message: 31 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 21:18:55
> -0500 From: "Carter, Bill" To: "Jason Aarons (US)" , Subject: Re:
> [cisco-voip] OT Hypothetical USB question Message-ID: Content-Type:
> text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Good news....Wal-Mart has it. $10 for 2
> meters. Even better, I can add it to my wedding registry in just 1-click! My
> wife of 15 years will be pleased.
> http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=11962586-----Original Message----- From: Jason Aarons (US) [mailto:
> jason.aarons at us.didata.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 9:15 PM To:
> Carter, Bill; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] OT
> Hypothetical USB question
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Serial_Bus#Maximum_useful_distanc e
> -----Original Message----- From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net[mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Carter, Bill Sent:
> Tuesday, October 06, 2009 8:53 PM To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Subject:
> [cisco-voip] OT Hypothetical USB question Lets say a fictitous company, lets
> call them Bay Networks, produced a new networking device with a mini-usb
> console port, how long of a USB-to-miniUSB cable could I buy of the shelf?
> _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip----------------------------------------- Disclaimer: This e-mail
> communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged
> information and is for use by the designated addressee(s) named above only.
> If you are not the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have
> received this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
> this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If
> you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
> by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.
> ------------------------------ Message: 32 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 21:23:05
> -0500 From: "Philip Walenta" To: "'Carter, Bill'" , Subject: Re:
> [cisco-voip] OT Hypothetical USB question Message-ID:
> <005301ca46f5$1addb630$50992290$@rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="us-ascii" I do 25ft on one of my printers ;-) -----Original
> Message----- From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Carter, Bill Sent:
> Tuesday, October 06, 2009 7:53 PM To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Subject:
> [cisco-voip] OT Hypothetical USB question Lets say a fictitous company, lets
> call them Bay Networks, produced a new networking device with a mini-usb
> console port, how long of a USB-to-miniUSB cable could I buy of the shelf?
> _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip------------------------------ Message: 33 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 21:22:17
> -0500 From: "Carter, Bill" To: "Philip Walenta" , Subject: Re: [cisco-voip]
> OT Hypothetical USB question Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="us-ascii" This new option from "Bay Networks" gets better every
> minute! -----Original Message----- From: Philip Walenta [mailto:
> pwalenta at wi.rr.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 9:23 PM To: Carter,
> Bill; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] OT Hypothetical
> USB question I do 25ft on one of my printers ;-) -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Carter, Bill Sent:
> Tuesday, October 06, 2009 7:53 PM To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Subject:
> [cisco-voip] OT Hypothetical USB question Lets say a fictitous company, lets
> call them Bay Networks, produced a new networking device with a mini-usb
> console port, how long of a USB-to-miniUSB cable could I buy of the shelf?
> _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip------------------------------ Message: 34 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 19:47:29
> -0700 (PDT) From: Jeff To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Subject:
> [cisco-voip] CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling Message-ID: <
> 284348.85626.qm at web111112.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="us-ascii" Hey guys, I'm hoping to pass the CCIE Voice written exam
> in the next couple of weeks. How long is the waiting list for the lab exam?
> My boss wants to know for scheduling purposes next year. Thanks.
> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: ------------------------------ Message: 35 Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009
> 09:17:57 +0000 (GMT) From: Arnold Lesar To: VoIPgroup Subject: Re:
> [cisco-voip] Cisco CRS Development interuption? Message-ID: <
> 347493.61310.qm at web26304.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="utf-8" Dear group, thanks for help with my prompt (P[])problem
> guys,it works well... and now i wanna ask about interuption in auto
> attendant. this the scenario: first user listen the welcome prompt: "welcome
> to "MYCOMPANY" for service in BAHASA please press 1......(SILENT) thank you
> for calling "MYCOMPANY" please press the extension.. bla..bla..bla" user
> don't care about this opening prompt(option prompt), he just want to press
> the extension that user want. because user had to press any number and then
> the extension. how to handle this problem? GBU Regards, Arnold Samuel Lesar
> ------------------------------------------------------ Note: This message
> was created by ARNOLD SAMUEL LESAR.
> ------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> PT. PELITA RELIANCE INTERNATIONAL Eka Hospital BSD City, Tangerang Address :
> CBD Lot IX, BSD City, Tangerang Phone : (+62-21) 256 555 55 Fax : (+62-21)
> 256 555 44
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ________________________________ From: "Robben, John" To: Arnold Lesar Sent:
> Tuesday, 6 October, 2009 21:50:22 Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Cisco CRS
> Development prompt problem. Arnold, I'd highly recommend that you download
> and read the following 3 documents from the Cisco website. Volume 1: Getting
> Started with Scripts for CUCCX 7.0.pdf Volume 2: Editor Step Reference Guide
> for CUCCX 7.0.pdf Volume 3: Expression Language Reference Guide for CUCCX
> 7.0.pdf In Volume 1, Chapter 12, the creation of the aa.aef script is
> covered in detail. If you've copied the default aa.aef script, and modified
> it, you'll need to do the following to get it to work: 1) Either download
> the script from the server to your local machine using the appadmin ->
> script management page and save it to a new name - or - open the script in
> the CUCCX editor and save it to your local machine under a new name. 2) Make
> the changes that you need to make. Validate, and save the script to your
> local machine. 3) Upload the modified script to the server using the
> appadmin -> script management page. (Don't forget to refresh). 4) Using the
> appadmin -> application management page, change your application to use the
> new script. (Don't forget to refresh). Once you've got the new script tied
> to the application, you can perform a Reactive Debug of the
> script/application using the CUCCX Editor to verify functionality. There are
> not really any Cisco Press, or third party books on CUCCX. The 3 files
> above, and the other pdf files available on Cisco.com, combined with the
> mailer are really the only options, other than Cisco or Cisco certified
> partner training classes. TAC does not provide support for custom scripting,
> and will point you to the mailer. Regards, John
> ________________________________ From: Arnold Lesar [mailto:
> arnoldlesar at yahoo.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 8:53 To: Robben,
> John Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco CRS Development prompt problem. Dear
> john, thanks for your help, in the welcome prompt it works,i've been trying
> when i first time modify welcomePrompt, but when i trying to modify callBusy
> prompt it couldn't work.so i try to create a new parameter and it work well.
> when i'm succeded with my copyofaa.aef, now i try to modify myaafiles.aef,
> my first step is create a new parameter(same step with copyofaa.aef) but it
> couldn't work. did i need to another step like validate, debug or i need
> another step to compile the CRS?? NOTE : Before i modified aa.aef i've
> create a copy. GBU Regards, Arnold Samuel Lesar
> ------------------------------------------------------ Note: This message
> was created by ARNOLD SAMUEL LESAR.
> ------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> PT. PELITA RELIANCE INTERNATIONAL Eka Hospital BSD City, Tangerang Address :
> CBD Lot IX, BSD City, Tangerang Phone : (+62-21) 256 555 55 Fax : (+62-21)
> 256 555 44
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ________________________________ From: "Robben, John" To: Arnold Lesar Sent:
> Tuesday, 6 October, 2009 19:12:24 Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Cisco CRS
> Development prompt problem. Arnold, I hope you get these screen shots. I
> recently went through this myself. NOTE: DON'T MODIFY SYSTEM PROMPTS.
> THEY'LL BE OVERWRITTEN WHEN YOU UPGRADE/PATCH. 1) Prompts. a "User" prompt
> will be located, and called, in a different manner than a "System" prompt.
> Example: The above shows the prompt directory structure. The below shows the
> AA directory. This is determined by my codec(G711), and language(en_US). 2)
> The aa.aef default script. Custom welcome message. First, copy the default
> script. DO NOT MODIFY THE SYSTEM SUPPLIED SCRIPT. MAKE A COPY AND MODIFY
> THAT. We see here, that the welcome prompt is a parameter variable: This
> means that we can change it at runtime, on the appadmin page. Simply check
> the box next to the prompt, and point it to a different prompt. Then click
> update. This assumes the following prompt structure on disk. Yours may vary.
> Hope this helps. John ________________________________ From:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Arnold Lesar Sent:
> Monday, October 05, 2009 20:41 To: VoIPgroup Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco
> CRS Development prompt problem. Dear Jhon, actually i'm new guy in VoIP
> 'couse my company ask me to modify auto attendant company. thanks for the
> answer. so, it means, that first i have to upload prompt next step i called
> in CRS Editor is it true? because i try to use P[C:\AA\file.wav] or
> P[\AA\file.wav] it couldn't work. thx Regards, Arnold Samuel Lesar
> ------------------------------------------------------ Note: This message
> was created by ARNOLD SAMUEL LESAR.
> ------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> PT. PELITA RELIANCE INTERNATIONAL Eka Hospital BSD City, Tangerang Address :
> CBD Lot IX, BSD City, Tangerang Phone : (+62-21) 256 555 55 Fax : (+62-21)
> 256 555 44
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ________________________________ From: "Robben, John" To: Arnold Lesar Sent:
> Tuesday, 6 October, 2009 0:15:49 Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Cisco CRS
> Development prompt problem. Arnold, SP[] is a "System" prompt, and should
> not be modified. You can upload "User" prompts (P[]) by using the prompt
> management portion located on the Appadmin page, and modify your script
> accordingly. Regards, John ________________________________ From:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Arnold Lesar Sent:
> Monday, October 05, 2009 3:19 To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Subject:
> [cisco-voip] Cisco CRS Development prompt problem. Dear all, i have some
> problem with crs editor. this is the problem : i just wanna try to modify my
> IVR with cisco CRS Editor ver 4.0. i'm start with aa.aef file, first i want
> to modify a prompt SP[], but i can not change that prompt. does anyone knows
> about this prompt? and how to insert .wav file into crs editor so i can use
> .wav my file? thanks for your help guys. Regards, Arnold Samuel Lesar
> ________________________________ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any
> attachments are from the NAIC and are intended only for the addressee.
> Information contained herein is confidential, and may be privileged or
> exempt from disclosure pursuant to applicable federal or state law. This
> message is not intended as a waiver of the confidential, privileged or
> exempted status of the information transmitted. Unauthorized forwarding,
> printing, copying, distribution or use of such information is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the addressee, please
> promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the delivery error by
> e-mail or by calling the NAIC Help Desk at (816)783-8500.
> ________________________________ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any
> attachments are from the NAIC and are intended only for the addressee..
> Information contained herein is confidential, and may be privileged or
> exempt from disclosure pursuant to applicable federal or state law. This
> message is not intended as a waiver of the confidential, privileged or
> exempted status of the information transmitted. Unauthorized forwarding,
> printing, copying, distribution or use of such information is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the addressee, please
> promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the delivery error by
> e-mail or by calling the NAIC Help Desk at (816)783-8500.
> ________________________________ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any
> attachments are from the NAIC and are intended only for the addressee.
> Information contained herein is confidential, and may be privileged or
> exempt from disclosure pursuant to applicable federal or state law. This
> message is not intended as a waiver of the confidential, privileged or
> exempted status of the information transmitted. Unauthorized forwarding,
> printing, copying, distribution or use of such information is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the addressee, please
> promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the delivery error by
> e-mail or by calling the NAIC Help Desk at (816)783-8500. --------------
> next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
> ------------------------------ Message: 36 Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 06:21:01
> -0700 From: "Chris Ward (chrward)" To: "Jeff" , Subject: Re: [cisco-voip]
> CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling Message-ID: <
> 75D9B5F4E50C8B4BB27622BD06C2B82B08D508F1 at xmb-sjc-235.amer.cisco.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Probably depends on your
> location, but I recently got in for my recert (which is the written) in less
> than 3 weeks. -Chris From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeff Sent: Tuesday,
> October 06, 2009 10:47 PM To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Subject:
> [cisco-voip] CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling Hey guys, I'm hoping to pass the CCIE
> Voice written exam in the next couple of weeks. How long is the waiting list
> for the lab exam? My boss wants to know for scheduling purposes next year.
> Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was
> scrubbed... URL: ------------------------------ Message: 37 Date: Wed, 7 Oct
> 2009 09:27:30 -0400 From: Daniel Rodriguez To: Jeff , "
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCIE Voice Lab
> Scheduling Message-ID: <
> 0789A7DD55CE174EB6D97F57422151A403E26F1B73 at nyc-exch03.fidelus.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Depends on where you plan on
> taking it. I know you shouldn't have a hard time reserving a seat at RTP.
> Not sure about San Jose though.. From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net[mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeff Sent: Tuesday,
> October 06, 2009 10:47 PM To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Subject:
> [cisco-voip] CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling Hey guys, I'm hoping to pass the CCIE
> Voice written exam in the next couple of weeks. How long is the waiting list
> for the lab exam? My boss wants to know for scheduling purposes next year.
> Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was
> scrubbed... URL: ------------------------------ Message: 38 Date: Wed, 07
> Oct 2009 09:29:17 -0400 From: Wes Sisk To: Subhrojyoti Banerjee Cc:
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] another question for
> the cisco folk Message-ID: <4ACC97AD.2000503 at cisco.com> Content-Type:
> text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; Format="flowed" Busted. I was not
> completely forthcoming with the rest of the communication: "CCBU/UCBU have a
> variant that is still 2 CPU." CCBU is basically all contact center products
> UCCX, UCCE, IP-IVR, etc. UCBU is Unity, Unity Connection meetingplace, CUPS,
> CUMA /Wes On Tuesday, October 06, 2009 5:13:21 PM, Subhrojyoti Banerjee
> wrote: > > Hi Wes, > > I posted the same question today, but had another
> related query. > Although it's pretty interesting fact, but it's a bit in
> contradiction > to what has been said about this before. This concept comes
> up in the > UCCE 7.5 BOM, where it says- > > *********(Pg
> 12)*********************** > Central Processing Unit > Each individual core
> in a multi-core processor does not count as a > processor towards server
> requirements given in Appendix A ? Server > Classes. A processor is
> considered a single physical CPU, regardless > of the number of cores. > >
> *************************************** > > But if a single E5540 processor
> quad core Nehalem processor can > function as a "7845" equivalent - with the
> number of supported phones > in line with the 7845 figures (of course with
> 4+GB and 4 x 140GB > drives), then that's a competitive piece of hardware.
> What do you think? > > Thanks, > Subhrojyoti > > > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >
> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 17:58:03 -0400 > From: lelio at uoguelph.ca > To:
> wsisk at cisco.com > CC: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net > Subject: Re:
> [cisco-voip] another question for the cisco folk > > that's kinda cool. save
> the cost of a CPU. should make the total cost > a bit cheaper. > > i guess
> UCCE, Connection, etc, require the additional quad core CPU to > sustain the
> higher device loads. > > thanks for chiming in. ;) > > --- > Lelio Fulgenzi,
> B.A. > Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> > (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) >
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >
> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt > > > ----- Original Message ----- >
> From: "Wes Sisk" > To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" > Cc: "cisco-voip voyp list" > Sent:
> Monday, October 5, 2009 5:52:33 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern > Subject:
> Re: [cisco-voip] another question for the cisco folk > > Confirmed, it is a
> single quad core instead of 2 dual cores. > Intentional and by design. > >
> /Wes > > On Monday, October 05, 2009 5:32:03 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi > wrote: > >
> hoping the cisco folk can chime in here...the latest swonly specs > for the
> HP servers show that the 7845 equivalent (not really, but > the one that
> serves 7500 units) is only one CPU, unlike the high > availability servers
> for connection which has two CPUs. > > was there an error in the docs or is
> the 7500 device server really > only one CPU? > > i'm hoping some internal
> training reflects the correct stats. > > > --- > Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. >
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 >
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) >
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >
> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >
> _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list >
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net >
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > > > --------------
> next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
> ------------------------------ Message: 39 Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 09:40:49
> -0400 (EDT) From: Lelio Fulgenzi To: Wes Sisk Cc:
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] another question for
> the cisco folk Message-ID: <
> 1485871332.11910221254922849510.JavaMail.root at simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Interesting. Back to CUCM...the
> price list references GL380 single CPU and dual CPU for prices, basically
> about double the cost. I guess they will have to modify this for the G6 to
> say 2.0Ghz and 2.5 Ghz. --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst (CCS) *
> University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519)
> 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ "Bad
> grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wes
> Sisk" To: "Subhrojyoti Banerjee" Cc: lelio at uoguelph.ca,
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2009 9:29:17 AM GMT
> -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] another question for the
> cisco folk Busted. I was not completely forthcoming with the rest of the
> communication: "CCBU/UCBU have a variant that is still 2 CPU." CCBU is
> basically all contact center products UCCX, UCCE, IP-IVR, etc. UCBU is
> Unity, Unity Connection meetingplace, CUPS, CUMA /Wes On Tuesday, October
> 06, 2009 5:13:21 PM, Subhrojyoti Banerjee wrote: Hi Wes, I posted the same
> question today, but had another related query. Although it's pretty
> interesting fact, but it's a bit in contradiction to what has been said
> about this before. This concept comes up in the UCCE 7.5 BOM, where it says-
> *********(Pg 12)*********************** Central Processing Unit Each
> individual core in a multi-core processor does not count as a processor
> towards server requirements given in Appendix A ? Server Classes. A
> processor is considered a single physical CPU, regardless of the number of
> cores. *************************************** But if a single E5540
> processor quad core Nehalem processor can function as a "7845" equivalent -
> with the number of supported phones in line with the 7845 figures (of course
> with 4+GB and 4 x 140GB drives), then that's a competitive piece of
> hardware. What do you think? Thanks, Subhrojyoti Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009
> 17:58:03 -0400 From: lelio at uoguelph.ca To: wsisk at cisco.com CC:
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] another question for
> the cisco folk that's kinda cool. save the cost of a CPU. should make the
> total cost a bit cheaper. i guess UCCE, Connection, etc, require the
> additional quad core CPU to sustain the higher device loads. thanks for
> chiming in. ;) --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of
> Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX
> (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ "Bad
> grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wes
> Sisk" To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" Cc: "cisco-voip voyp list" Sent: Monday, October
> 5, 2009 5:52:33 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Re: [cisco-voip]
> another question for the cisco folk Confirmed, it is a single quad core
> instead of 2 dual cores. Intentional and by design. /Wes On Monday, October
> 05, 2009 5:32:03 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote: hoping the cisco folk can chime
> in here...the latest swonly specs for the HP servers show that the 7845
> equivalent (not really, but the one that serves 7500 units) is only one CPU,
> unlike the high availability servers for connection which has two CPUs. was
> there an error in the docs or is the 7500 device server really only one CPU?
> i'm hoping some internal training reflects the correct stats. --- Lelio
> Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario
> N1G 2W1 (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ "Bad
> grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
> _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip -------------- next
> part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
> ------------------------------ Message: 40 Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:13:49
> -0400 From: Daniel Rodriguez To: Jeff , "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net"
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling Message-ID: <
> 0789A7DD55CE174EB6D97F57422151A403E26F1B98 at nyc-exch03.fidelus.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" There was a several month waiting
> period because everyone wanted to attempt the lab before the new blueprint
> went live. From: Jeff [mailto:jeffeloy at yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, October
> 07, 2009 10:04 AM To: Daniel Rodriguez; cisco-voip at puck.nether.netSubject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling Either San Jose or RTP
> would work. I was under the impression there was a several month wait list
> though. Is that not correct? Thanks, Jeff ________________________________
> From: Daniel Rodriguez To: Jeff ; "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" Sent:
> Wednesday, October 7, 2009 8:27:30 AM Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CCIE Voice
> Lab Scheduling Depends on where you plan on taking it. I know you shouldn?t
> have a hard time reserving a seat at RTP. Not sure about San Jose though..
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeff Sent: Tuesday,
> October 06, 2009 10:47 PM To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Subject:
> [cisco-voip] CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling Hey guys, I'm hoping to pass the CCIE
> Voice written exam in the next couple of weeks. How long is the waiting list
> for the lab exam? My boss wants to know for scheduling purposes next year.
> Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was
> scrubbed... URL: ------------------------------ Message: 41 Date: Wed, 7 Oct
> 2009 10:25:48 -0400 From: Pat Hayes To: Lelio Fulgenzi Cc:
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] connection bugs?
> Message-ID: <1e877ff90910070725w812a3b5nd2005089c71c0332 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Are you also using LDAP for
> authentication? If you have confirmed that it is actually the CuImapSvr
> process that is chewing up CPU, you should get a TAC case open. We've seen a
> few instances of similar circumstances that are currently under
> investigation. On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote: > just
> wondering if the Cisco folk out there have any insight to the > following. >
> > there seems to be another SSL bug in Unity Connection, where the CPU
> creeps > up after IMAP/SSL connections start. in less than three days, CPU
> goes from > 1% to 25%. it eventually goes up to 99%. i've seen this one
> CSCta02379: IMAP > server leaks memory when TLS/SSL is used but that refers
> only to memory. i > can't seem to find anything else. > > i'll be opening a
> case with the TAC tomorrow, but thought i'd ask. > > > > > > --- > Lelio
> Fulgenzi, B.A. > Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph,
> Ontario N1G 2W1 > (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) >
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >
> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt > > >
> _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list >
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net >
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > >
> ------------------------------ Message: 42 Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:34:25
> -0400 From: Dane Newman To: cisco-voip Subject: [cisco-voip] cisco unified
> mobility advantage Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1" For lab purposes and testing can this server be run on
> vmware? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was
> scrubbed... URL: ------------------------------ Message: 43 Date: Wed, 7 Oct
> 2009 08:12:46 -0500 From: Scott Kee To: "'Adam Frankel'" Cc: cisco-voip
> mailinglist Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] adding subscriber in the CUCM cluster
> Message-ID: <
> 21712D91F95FB640822E2DFE19ADB7DB1019D6C8 at CMSMAIL.Spectrumhealth.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Yep that was the issue. Thanks
> for the help. scott -----Original Message----- From: Adam Frankel [mailto:
> afrankel at cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 8:36 PM To: Scott Kee
> Cc: cisco-voip mailinglist Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] adding subscriber in
> the CUCM cluster You could try activating the "Cisco CallManager" service on
> the Subscriber. Adam -------- Original Message -------- Subject:
> [cisco-voip] adding subscriber in the CUCM cluster From: Scott Kee To:
> cisco-voip mailinglist Date: 10/6/09 12:48 PM I am trying to setup a test
> CUCM cluster in my test lab. I've setup CUCM Publisher and Subscriber using
> VMware v2. I tweaked MAC Addresses so both Publisher and Subscriber has MAC
> address as production server. I installed License keys so CUCM has 2 server
> and devices licenses. So I think I am good as far as licenses concern. I
> installed Publisher and works fine however I installed Subscriber but it is
> not showing up in the CUCM Group. It only shows Publisher. I configured
> subscriber in the System->Server and System->Cisco Unified UM before I
> installed Subscriber. Do I need to change anything after the installation?
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip------------------------------ Message: 44 Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 09:46:14
> -0500 From: "Kim, Hyoun S" To: , Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco VG204/202 &
> Hylafax Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" I recently
> just completed installing several Cisco VG204 & VG202 gateways at my office.
> We use a mix of real fax machines and a Linux server running Hylafax. The
> Hylafax server is used only for receiving faxes. No users use the Hylafax
> server to send faxes because we have real physical fax machines located
> strategically throughout the office. When receiving faxes to the physical
> fax machines, the faxes are received just fine. However, when faxes are
> received to numbers associated with the Hylafax server, we run into an
> issue. Some, if not all received fax pages end up being "cut off". That is,
> there is random garbage near the end of a fax page which is unreadable.
> However, everything above that garbage is readable & faxed fine. Prior to
> migrating to the VG gateways, all received Hylafax faxes were normal. I'm
> thinking it has to do with the way my faxes are set up on the Voice Gateway.
> Below is my relevant config on the VG202 (the config is identical across all
> the VGs). Any ideas? I'm using SCCP for all my phones because I was told it
> was the easiest & recommended way to set up the VoIP network. version 12.4 !
> stcapp ccm-group 100 stcapp ! stcapp feature access-code ! voice service
> voip modem passthrough nse codec g711ulaw ! voice-card 0 ! interface
> FastEthernet0/0 ip address 172.21.xxx.xxx 255.255.255.0 duplex auto speed
> auto ! interface FastEthernet0/1 no ip address shutdown duplex auto speed
> auto ! ip forward-protocol nd ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.21.xxx.xxx !
> voice-port 0/0 timeouts initial 60 timeouts interdigit 60 timeouts
> call-disconnect 3 timeouts ringing infinity ! voice-port 0/1 timeouts
> initial 60 timeouts interdigit 60 timeouts call-disconnect 3 timeouts
> ringing infinity ! ccm-manager fax protocol cisco ccm-manager sccp local
> FastEthernet0/0 ! mgcp fax t38 ecm mgcp behavior g729-variants static-pt !
> sccp local FastEthernet0/0 sccp ccm 172.21.xxx.xxx identifier 1 priority 1
> version 7.0 sccp ! sccp ccm group 100 associate ccm 1 priority 1 ! dial-peer
> voice 1000 pots service stcapp port 0/0 ! dial-peer voice 1001 pots service
> stcapp port 0/1 ________________________________ Hyoun Kim * Network
> Administrator I - East Division 640 Broadmor Blvd * Suite 80 * Murfreesboro,
> TN 37129 ' 615.217.6245 * ' 859.312.6941 * 7 615.217.6255 * *
> Hyoun.Kim at chartercom.com E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of
> this e-mail message and any attachments are intended solely for the
> addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged
> information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or if
> this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert
> the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message and any attachments.
> If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use,
> dissemination, distribution, copying, or storage of this message or any
> attachment is strictly prohibited. -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part
> -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available
> Type: image/jpeg Size: 1990 bytes Desc: image003.jpg URL:
> ------------------------------ Message: 45 Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 09:01:12
> -0500 From: "Daniel Durkin" To: "Daniel Martin" , Subject: Re: [cisco-voip]
> VoIP Monitoring tool Message-ID: <
> 44B276AA34DFBC4B871C48F53BB06A0901DBFB82 at DC1IVEXC01.woodforest.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Have you looked at Cacti? It
> is free, though it takes some home growing. Daniel Durkin Woodforest
> National Bank Voice Communications Engineer ddurkin at woodforest.com832.375.2826 Office 832.375.3826 Fax 832.326.7780 Mobile From:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Daniel Martin Sent:
> Friday, October 02, 2009 1:39 PM To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Subject:
> [cisco-voip] VoIP Monitoring tool Hi, I would like to know what most of the
> people on this List are using for monitoring they VoIP/Network
> infrastructure. There's two products that I'm looking at right now. One is
> CA EHealth for Voice and the other is Cisco Operations/Service Monitor. The
> CA is more expensive and would integrate into our CA Spectrum tool. Is
> anybody using these tools or others? I know there is Prognosis but I think
> it is very expensive as well. I would like to synthetic voice calls, monitor
> end-to-end voice network, monitor the Call Manager servers, provide
> historical reporting and do alarm notification. Thanks, Daniel. Daniel
> Martin Chef de Groupe - Infrastructure R?seau et T?l?com Group Leader -
> Network Infrastructure and Telecom CAE Inc. St-Laurent, Qu?bec Canada H4T
> 1G6 T?l: 1-514-341-2000 x4878 Fax: 1-514-340-5489 The information contained
> in this e-mail message is intended only for use of the individual or entity
> named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,
> you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of
> this communication is strictly prohibited. -------------- next part
> -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
> ------------------------------ Message: 46 Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:54:17
> -0400 (EDT) From: Lelio Fulgenzi To: Pat Hayes Cc:
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] connection bugs?
> Message-ID: <
> 1903482165.11949061254927257171.JavaMail.root at simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Yes, we're using LDAP for
> authentication. And I have confirmed using RTMT that CuImapSvr is the
> process. I'll be opening a case shortly. Just making sure that the non-SSL
> config doesn't cause the same issue. --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst
> (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 (519) 824-4120 x56354
> (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ "Bad
> grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pat
> Hayes" To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Sent:
> Wednesday, October 7, 2009 10:25:48 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject:
> Re: [cisco-voip] connection bugs? Are you also using LDAP for
> authentication? If you have confirmed that it is actually the CuImapSvr
> process that is chewing up CPU, you should get a TAC case open. We've seen a
> few instances of similar circumstances that are currently under
> investigation. On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote: > just
> wondering if the Cisco folk out there have any insight to the > following. >
> > there seems to be another SSL bug in Unity Connection, where the CPU
> creeps > up after IMAP/SSL connections start. in less than three days, CPU
> goes from > 1% to 25%. it eventually goes up to 99%. i've seen this one
> CSCta02379: IMAP > server leaks memory when TLS/SSL is used but that refers
> only to memory. i > can't seem to find anything else. > > i'll be opening a
> case with the TAC tomorrow, but thought i'd ask. > > > > > > --- > Lelio
> Fulgenzi, B.A. > Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph,
> Ontario N1G 2W1 > (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) >
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >
> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt > > >
> _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list >
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net >
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > > --------------
> next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
> ------------------------------ Message: 47 Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 07:04:25
> -0700 (PDT) From: Jeff To: Daniel Rodriguez , "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net"
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling Message-ID: <
> 807323.21719.qm at web111108.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="utf-8" Either San Jose or RTP would work. I was under the
> impression there was a several month wait list though. Is that not correct?
> Thanks, Jeff ________________________________ From: Daniel Rodriguez To:
> Jeff ; "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2009
> 8:27:30 AM Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling Depends on
> where you plan on taking it. I know you shouldn?t have a hard time reserving
> a seat at RTP. Not sure about San Jose though..
> From:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net<From%3Acisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net>[mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeff Sent: Tuesday,
> October 06, 2009 10:47 PM To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Subject:
> [cisco-voip] CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling Hey guys, I'm hoping to pass the CCIE
> Voice written exam in the next couple of weeks. How long is the waiting list
> for the lab exam? My boss wants to know for scheduling purposes next year.
> Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was
> scrubbed... URL: ------------------------------ Message: 48 Date: Wed, 7 Oct
> 2009 11:17:20 -0400 From: Mike Lydick To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.netSubject: [cisco-voip] Cobras export/import to Unity 7 UM Message-ID:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" We are doing a parallel
> upgrade of Unity 4.05 to Unity 7(Unified Messaging/Exchange). Is it
> necessary to export voicemails with cobra to do a full migration to the new
> Unity 7 server? If the messages are not exported, because the message are
> still on the Exchange server, will the new unity server see theses as unity
> voicemails? Best Regards, Mike Lydick -------------- next part
> -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
> ------------------------------ Message: 49 Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:32:20
> -0500 From: Tim Fulton To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Subject:
> [cisco-voip] Bulk Subscription Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1" Is is possible to subscribe services in bulk? What I
> want to do is add a service url to the second line on about 600 phones.
> WhatI don't want to do is manually add the service to each device. Thanks
> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: ------------------------------ Message: 50 Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009
> 10:50:38 -0500 From: "Voice Noob" To: "'Jeff'" , "'Daniel Rodriguez'" ,
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling Message-ID:
> <005401ca4765$ecfe7ad0$c6fb7070$@com> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="utf-8" Nope not anymore. The lab changed so it is not as hard to
> get in. From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeff Sent: Wednesday,
> October 07, 2009 9:04 AM To: Daniel Rodriguez; cisco-voip at puck.nether.netSubject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling Either San Jose or RTP
> would work. I was under the impression there was a several month wait list
> though. Is that not correct? Thanks, Jeff _____ From: Daniel Rodriguez To:
> Jeff ; "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2009
> 8:27:30 AM Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling Depends on
> where you plan on taking it. I know you shouldn?t have a hard time reserving
> a seat at RTP. Not sure about San Jose though.. From:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeff Sent: Tuesday,
> October 06, 2009 10:47 PM To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net Subject:
> [cisco-voip] CCIE Voice Lab Scheduling Hey guys, I'm hoping to pass the CCIE
> Voice written exam in the next couple of weeks. How long is the waiting list
> for the lab exam? My boss wants to know for scheduling purposes next year.
> Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was
> scrubbed... URL: ------------------------------ Message: 51 Date: Wed, 7 Oct
> 2009 10:51:29 -0500 From: "Voice Noob" To: "'Mike Lydick'" , Subject: Re:
> [cisco-voip] Cobras export/import to Unity 7 UM Message-ID:
> <006501ca4766$0ab6aa20$2023fe60$@com> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="us-ascii" No you do not need to grab the voicemails. From:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mike Lydick Sent:
> Wednesday, October 07, 2009 10:17 AM To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.netSubject: [cisco-voip] Cobras export/import to Unity 7 UM We are doing a
> parallel upgrade of Unity 4.05 to Unity 7(Unified Messaging/Exchange). Is it
> necessary to export voicemails with cobra to do a full migration to the new
> Unity 7 server? If the messages are not exported, because the message are
> still on the Exchange server, will the new unity server see theses as unity
> voicemails? Best Regards, Mike Lydick -------------- next part
> -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
> ------------------------------
> _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip End of cisco-voip
> Digest, Vol 72, Issue 7 *****************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20091007/4ba4147d/attachment.html>