[cisco-voip] CUCM park behavior change
Wes Sisk
wsisk at cisco.com
Thu Oct 8 10:31:26 EDT 2009
we've seen a few cases about this. there was nothing in the original
feature design that required the selection order. When In Memory
Database (IMDB) was implemented in CM7.x (woo hooo! less dependence on
informix realtime access) the change in selection order was a
byproduct. As there was no previous requirement for selection order it
was hard(impossible) to call this "breakage".
/Wes
On Thursday, October 08, 2009 9:17:26 AM, Tim Frazee <tfrazee at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Group,
>
> I am running 7.1.2.31900 PUB/SUB setup and I noticed a difference in
> park behavior that I'm ok with, but curious as to why its different
> and how to change if I wanted to.
>
> As far as I can remember, when you parked a call and your park range
> was (for example) 702X, it would use a round-robin method of number
> allocation. It would always choose the next number in the range
> regardless of the state of the previous park numbers.
>
> Now the behaviour is top down. It chooses the first number in the
> range if its available. If I repark a call, it gets a different park
> slot than it had before This is different than I remember the all of
> Callmanager versions operation.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20091008/f41af1de/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list